One common similarity that is quite peculiar is they both show body parts of the monsters they fought. “The victory, for the proof, hanging high from the rafters where Beowulf had hung it, was the monster’s arm, claw, and shoulder and all” (lines 515-517). Gilgamesh’s case was very comparable to Beowulf’s situation. “And late that he reached again to see if he was yet asleep, but there was only quiet breathing. The stars against the midnight sky were sparkling like mica in a riverbed. In the slight breeze the head of Humbaba was swinging from a tree” (lines 50-55). Difference is, both Gilgamesh and Beowulf killed their enemies in two dissimilar ways. Gilgamesh used an ax to behead Humbaba and Beowulf used his godly powers to take Grendel’s arm. Second difference between the two in this situation is Gilgamesh had help from his partner in crime, Enkidu. While on the other hand, Beowulf fought all his battles alone without the aid of
One common similarity that is quite peculiar is they both show body parts of the monsters they fought. “The victory, for the proof, hanging high from the rafters where Beowulf had hung it, was the monster’s arm, claw, and shoulder and all” (lines 515-517). Gilgamesh’s case was very comparable to Beowulf’s situation. “And late that he reached again to see if he was yet asleep, but there was only quiet breathing. The stars against the midnight sky were sparkling like mica in a riverbed. In the slight breeze the head of Humbaba was swinging from a tree” (lines 50-55). Difference is, both Gilgamesh and Beowulf killed their enemies in two dissimilar ways. Gilgamesh used an ax to behead Humbaba and Beowulf used his godly powers to take Grendel’s arm. Second difference between the two in this situation is Gilgamesh had help from his partner in crime, Enkidu. While on the other hand, Beowulf fought all his battles alone without the aid of