On October 26th, 2001, just 45 days after September 11th a panicked Congress passed, with little debate, the USA Patriot Act. The 342 page patriot act violates our 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th and 14th amendments, thus making it unconstitutional. I don't know why Congress passed this act, or how it got through the Supreme Court, but most people in Congress didn't even read the Patriot Act. I am sure that our founding fathers would not have wanted the Patriot Act. Just look at what Ben Franklin said, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."…
As the Patriot was enacted so quickly, and with little oversight, a full review with the complete participation of Congress could allow for positive revisions. Without losing the major benefits, such as increased security and safety for our nations citizens, collective law enforcement cooperation and information sharing, and speeding up investigations by making legitimate use of surveillance easier to enact, taking another look at this incredibly powerful law is imperative. Allowing government authority to surpass that which the Constitution allows is completely contradictory to the founders intentions, and to the principles on which this nation was founded. As stated by Benjamin Franklin in his Pennsylvania Assembly Reply to the Governor, “those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety” (Franklin, 1755). This is important to remember, as our nation becomes more accepting of tighter scrutiny in our private lives, all in the name of safety and security. Our world is changing, to be certain, though the extent in which we allow that change is solely in our hands, we, the people of the United…
The Patriot Act has caused a significant amount of controversy ever since it was passed by President Bush in 2001. Two different arguments have come about and many people feel very strongly about their respective opinions. Although there are many positives to The Patriot Act it should not be legal and is ultimatley unconstitutional. The Patriot Act should not be allowed because it completley violates the innocent Americans privacy.…
One September 11, 2001 Islamic Terrorists hijacked several flights and struck the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The US was shaken by 9/11. In response to the attacks the US passed laws to protect its people. The Patriot Act was one of the laws or acts that was passed in response to the 9/11 attacks. The goals of the Patriot Act were to strengthen domestic security and increase the powers of law-enforcement agencies to stop terrorism. In addition, the US Department of Homeland security created the Transportation Security Agency (TSA) to protect the nation’s Airways. Finally we have organizations such as the NSA that collect domestic and foreign information in order to protect the US. However, we end up sacrificing our privacy without…
This first section provides a brief explanation of the history of the Patriot Act. A common misconception about the Patriot Act is that it takes away personal liberty and is an unprecedented power grab by the federal government. What most people do not realize is that the Patriot Act, for the most part, only amends and updates current law, as opposed to creating entirely new laws. In his remarks on the Senate floor while pushing for passage of this act, Senator Patrick Leahy acknowledged that some of the amendments presented for consideration may have been unconstitutional. Leahy said, “After that terrible day of September 11, we began looking at our laws, and what we might do. Fortunately for the country . . . we took time to look at it, we took time to read it, and we took time to remove those parts that were…
Fry's Home Electronics | Computer Parts & Accessories, Software, Games, TVs, Cameras - Frys.com. http://www.frys.com/…
One of the biggest violations to American Civil Rights is the Patriot Act. “The USA PATRIOT Act is an Act of the U.S. Congress that was signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001. The act greatly reduced restrictions that were placed on law enforcement agencies and gave them the ability to search telephone, e-mail communications, medical, financial, and other records. It eased restrictions on foreign intelligence gathering within the United States and expanded the Secretary of the Treasury’s authority to regulate financial transactions. The Patriot Act expanded the definition of terrorism to include domestic terrorism, thus enlarging the number of activities to which the powers can be applied. Since its passage, several legal challenges have been brought against the act, and Federal courts have ruled that a number of provisions are unconstitutional. Opponents have criticized the sections that authorize the indefinite detentions of immigrants, searches through which law enforcement officers search a home or business without the owner’s or the occupant’s permission or knowledge, and the expanded use of National Security Letters, which allows the FBI to search telephone, e-mail, and financial records without a court order. The Patriot Act gave law enforcement agencies unprecedented access to business records, including library and financial records. Not all aspects of the Act have been challenged and many Americans have approved the passage. People have promoted the provisions made to the Bank Secrecy Act, which requires financial institutions in the United States to assist U.S. government agencies to detect and prevent money laundering. Title II of the Patriot Act established three very controversial provisions, “sneak and peek” warrants, roving wiretaps and the ability of the FBI to gain access to documents that reveal the patterns of U.S. citizens. The so-called “sneak and peek” law allowed for delayed notification of the execution of search…
The Patriot ACT has greatly affected how America deals with situations involving terrorism, or threats of terrorism, but the main problem is simple, and that is that it deprives American citizens of certain rights and liberties. And now imagine if you had to choose between your privacy and your safety. Pretty hard choice, right? And this is how many Americans feel today, because they have to make this choice. And this essay will break down what the Patriot Act is and the argument for, and against, the act itself. And this act is relatively new, as it was created in the early 2000’s under the presidential leadership of George W. Bush. And there are multiple reasons why the Patriot Act is unconstitutional, and they will be mentioned, and elaborated on, throughout this essay, such as our right to privacy as American citizens, and our right to our amendments, and will also touch on how the opposition believes that this act is necessary to our survival as a nation and why they are wrong.…
The Patriot Act was designed to try and eliminate acts of terrorism on the United States. This act was signed in 2001 by president George W. Bush. Just weeks after the terrorist attacks on 9/11(NBCNews). The Patriot Act allows for the government to identify terrorist. “This is done by wiretapping and monitoring text messages and phone calls’’(Diamond).I am not saying that are civil liberty aren't important but when it comes to keeping our citizens safe then this is the only choice. People who have nothing to hid should have no problem with the government monitoring them for the sake of people's lives. The patriot act has allowed for at least 50 terrorist attacks against the United States to be foiled since 9/11.(Johnson) This Act is doing…
During September 11, 2001, our country was under attack by some radical terrorist group. On October 11, 2001 a month later the legislation was passed by the Senate and later passed by the House on October 24, 2001 and sign into law by President George W, Bush in October 26, 2001. The “USA PATRIOT ACT” was born with its sole purpose is to grant greater powers and authority to the Homeland Security Department stretching out its power to federal, state and local level law enforcement to investigate, prosecute, and prevented the country from any future attack.…
In addition, the act is a threat to civil liberties because it destroys portions of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution. Those amendment rights include freedom of speech and assembly; unreasonable search and seizure; right to due process of law; speedy trial; and excessive cruel and unusual punishments. Furthermore, the act gives government authorities to tap into any phones of citizens or monitor everyday uses of the internet. The scariest part is that any Americans can be labeled as domestic terrorists if they engage in even normal criminal acts. On the other hand, the USA FREEDOM Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by Fulfilling Rights and Ending Eavesdropping, Dragnet-collection and Online Monitoring Act) was passed to impose limits on bulk collection of telecommunication data on citizens by intelligence agencies. The act extended the Patriot Act provision that involves roving wiretaps and lone wolf…
As a result of the attacks on the date of 9/11, Congress passed the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act made the government’s ability to spy on individuals easier, but also weakened the checks and balances our country relies on. So in essence, the threat of terrorism against our country paved the way for violating one of our basic civil liberties under the fourth amendment of the constitution – the ability to live free of unreasonable searches and seizures. However, the ability for government agencies to obtain information quickly and without warning becomes a powerful tool against terrorism.…
The PATRIOT Act, short for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001, is a law that was passed following the September 11, 2001 attacks on the U.S. to prevent future acts of terror. Becoming effective October 26, 2001, under the Bush Administration, the bill presented by Frank J. Sensenbrenner, Jr. (R-WI), would change and sculpt the operation of an entire country over the next decade and beyond. While the purpose of this legislation was ultimately to protect our homeland and to prevent terrorism, as previously mentioned, great controversy surrounds the legislation because many Americans feel that this legislation allows the government to invade their privacy, without the need for substantieated grounds.…
Espionage is the secret gathering of information on rival countries for military purposes. Espionage can be used in business, military, economic or political decisions however; it is commonly employed government for defensive tactics. Espionage or spying is illegal in many nations however, it gains profits from agencies to protect the secrecy of information that is desired.…
I strongly affirm the resolved: Government Security Agencies Are Justified In Monitoring Private Communication For The Sake Of National Security.…