Essay On Life Without Parole

Life Without Parole Essay Juveniles do not deserve to waste away their life, rotting in a prison cell. According to a Supreme Court decision back in 2012, A majority of the United States Supreme Court Justices banned juveniles who committed heinous crimes such as murder from getting life without parole sentences. Yes, it seems that this is unfair for justice, but the fact is that juveniles are not equal to adults. Why should a juvenile receive the same punishment as an adult when both are treated so differently and both are cognitively different? I agree with the majority of Supreme Court Justices to abolish the sentence of mandatory life in prison for juveniles because juveniles are oblivious to the long term effects of their criminal
Paul Thompson wrote of Nathaniel Brazill, who murdered his teacher, looking “dazed during the trial”(Thompson) and his “various quizzical looks that came across his face as the verdicts were read.” This statement saying how juveniles do not grasp what they did when their emotions were out of control. Marijue Lundstrom speaks about “a fifteen-year-old Yuba City youth who reportedly claimed he was mimicking a TV program about little girls who rob a bank was given a 26-years-to-life prison term.”(Lundstrom) These strong emotions for this case displays how easy it is for the actions of juvenile to be carried
A juvenile should have the right to a second chance. In conclusion, the abolishment of the life without parole sentence is only fair to juveniles as information has shown how different a juvenile is compared to an adult in the legal