Preview

Juvenile Life Without Parole, Cruel or Just Unusual?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3430 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Juvenile Life Without Parole, Cruel or Just Unusual?
Juveniles Sentenced to Life without Parole

Cruel or Just Unusual?

[pic]

Juvenile Sentencing: Life without Parole, Cruel or Just Unusual?

When the Judge announced the verdict “Guilty” there was a slight murmur in the court room as was expected. Then the Judge began to announce the sentence “Life in prison without the possibility of parole”, the words cutting through the air like an arrow through a paper target. The courtroom was an arena of mixed feelings, half cheering in a celebratory manner, the other half crying and shouting in disbelief. Someone’s 13 year old son was going to prison for the rest of his life without any chance of parole. Children should never be sentenced to life without parole, making the sentence in itself a death penalty for a juvenile. This scenario has been played out in America’s courtrooms many times over the years. Every year in the United States, children as young as thirteen are sentenced to die in prison. It’s called life without parole (LWOP, JLWOP for juveniles). It is estimated that thousands of children have been sentenced to life without the possibility of parole for crimes committed at an age when they are not considered responsible enough to live away from their parents, drive, make decisions related to their education or medical treatment, vote, leave school or sign a contract. Children under the age eighteen cannot legally use alcohol, serve on juries or be drafted, because they are presumed not to have the capacity to handle adult responsibilities (Labelle, Phillips, Horton, 2006). These differences are recognized throughout the world, and incorporated into many international human rights documents. Currently as of May 2009, an estimated 2,500 juveniles (ranging in age from 13 to 17) in the United States are serving a sentence of life without parole. Iraq doesn't do it and North Korea considers it a cruel form of punishment. However, in the United States sentencing a juvenile to life in prison without



Cited: Charles Stimson, Grossman, A.W. (2009, August) Adult Crime for Adult Time: Life without Parole for Juvenile Killers and Violent Teens. Washington D.C., The Heritage Foundation Center for Legal and Judicial Studies. Deborah LaBelle, Phillips, A., & Horton, L. (2006, January 1). Second Chances: Juveniles serving life sentences in Michigan prisons. Detroit, Michigan. American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan. End Juvenile Life without Parole. (2009, June 9) American Civil Liberties Union Online. http://www.aclu.org/human-rights_racial-justice/end-juvenile-life-without-parole. Graham v. Florida. No. 08-7412., Supreme Court of the United States, 130 S. Ct. 357; 175 L. Ed. 2d 18; 2009 U.S., October 5, 2009, Decided. Krista Gesaman. (2009, November 4). 18 and a Life to Go. Newsweek. Kristin Henning. (2009, October 26th). The Case Against Juvenile Life Without Parole: Good Policy and Good Law. Co-Director of Juvenile Justice Clinic and Professor of Law at Georgetown University Law Center. Robert Barnes. (2010, May 18). Supreme Court restricts life without parole for juveniles. Washington D.C., Washington Post. Roper v. Simmons. No. 02-1057 , Supreme Court of the United States, 538 U.S. 923; 123 S. Ct. 1582; 155 L. Ed. 2d 314; 2003 U.S., March 24, 2005, Decided. Sullivan v. Florida. No. 08-7621., Supreme Court of the United States, 129 S. Ct. 2157; 173 L. Ed. 2d 1155; 2009 U.S., May 4, 2009, Decided. Warren Richey. (2010, May 17), Supreme Court puts limits on life sentences for juveniles, Staff writer, The Christian Science Monitor.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    a. Arizona v. R. Joseph Gant, Supreme Court of the United States, 2009 (April 21, 2009)…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Citations: United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 115 S. Ct. 1624, 131 L. Ed. 2d 626 (1995).…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 478 U.S. 186 Bowers v. Hardwick Retrieved from http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0478_0186_ZS.html…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cooper V. Austin

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Philip J. Cooper v. Charles Austin 837 S. W. 2d 606 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1992)…

    • 864 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Vincent M. Southerland and Jody Kent Lavy write about their take on sentencing children to life in prison without parole and why it's wrong. Throughout the article the authors have you thinking about how cruel and harsh of a sentence life in prison is for children. A good argument the two authors make is that “young people are more susceptible to peer pressure than adults, and less capable of thinking through the consequences of their actions and assessing risks”. Through this statement the authors point out the physiologically a child doesn't have fair judgment. When adults are sentenced to life in prison their brains have already matured and should fully understand the difference between right and wrong, but children are still in the process…

    • 274 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    PBS’s “Second Chance Kids” film is about juveniles who commit heinous crime being giving a second chance to get out of prison and start their life over. The reason for the court creating this new law, enabling inmates that were sentenced to life without parole in prison, is to allow for the opportunity of rehabilitation of the juveniles. Sentencing a juvenile to life without parole is inhumane, because takes away any incentive for that individual to rehabilitate themselves. It is also unfair, because as a minor your brain is still developing which causes minors to act irrational or without thinking, so when a teenage commits a terrible crime that should not be able to define the rest of their life. Some commonalities all the individuals considered…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles who committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison. A few justices believed life in prison without parole for a juvenile prevents consideration for their chronological age and its features. But four justices disagreed saying that heinous crimes committed by juveniles should be punished with a sentence of life in prison, or a 17-year-old would be released to society after he had gun down his fellow classmates and teachers. I disagree with the Supreme Court ruling. I believe that every juvenile who has committed a heinous crime should be sentenced to life in prison without parole. The victims of the crime would get the justice they deserve, they are at the age where they should know what they are doing, and brain development does not play a fact to juveniles committing heinous crimes .…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    gregg v. georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 96 S. Ct. 2909, 49 L. Ed. 2d 859 [1976]…

    • 2195 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Despite the fact that in America we incarcerate more juveniles for life terms than in any other country in the world, that truth is that the vast majority of youth offenders will one day be released. The question is simple and stark. Do we want to help them change or do we want to help them become even more violent and dangerous?” by Ayelet Waldman. The quote points out that the U.S. punishing juveniles by putting them in jail for lifetime more than any other countries around the world can be harmful and also helpful as the same time. Many states have also tried the method in a purpose of decreasing the crimes rate and as it has worked in some places, there are also some unexpected results over some places. A punishment of life without parole for juvenile criminals has become a big matter between people. Proponents argue that the plan is helpful and it has decreased the crimes rate over some places while opponents argue that punishments do only little change to behavior.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our current criminal justice system frequently places juveniles into adult prisons and until just recently had mandatory life sentences for some juvenile crimes. The much divided Supreme Court ruled that mandatory life sentences were unconstitutional and as a result has sparked vigorous debate as many have joined the conversation regarding how juveniles are treated in prison and if our current system is working. Despite the fierce debate, current science and statistics seems to favor one side over the other. The current United States legal system is clearly flawed as alternative systems are superior, the current system adversely affects juveniles and their chance at rehabilitation, and recent findings on juvenile brain…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Civil Rights

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    403 U.S. 217; 91 S. Ct. 1940; 29 L. Ed. 2d 438; 1971 U.S. LEXIS 27…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rogerian Essay

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages

    At least 281 children under age 18 have been executed in the United States since the 17th century (Prejean). To many this may not seem like a huge number, however there is a growing concern about whether or not juvenile capital punishment should be allowed. The subject of capital is already a touchy subject for most but when the idea of juveniles is included, the argument gets especially sensitive. Most countries do not permit it but the United States is one of the few. National laws, and international practice and opinion all work against the juvenile death penalty. It is hoped that U.S. policy in the future will be more in line with the Model Penal Code notion that “civilized societies will not tolerate the spectacle of the execution of children”. The main question is, is this working? Are juveniles old enough to commit a crime and receive the ultimate punishment or are their minds not mature enough to even legally imprison them because their personality is still forming.…

    • 1924 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Juveniless Death Penalty

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Juveniles and the death penalty is a hotly debated issue in the criminal justice system. There are two different views on the death penalty some are for and some are against the punishment. Some see juveniles as young and influential and deserve a second chance to clean up and become a productive member of society, while others feel the punishment should fit the crime; no matter what age.…

    • 1577 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many under age kids commit crimes and get really hard punishments for it. Knowing that they are still growing up, they sometimes get life without parole in prison. Recent statistics show that in 2007 the crime rate increased, but in 2015 it decreased dramatically. I agree with the majority of Supreme Court Justices who believe that this sentence violates the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment because juveniles are still immature, developing their brains, and unaware of impact of decision.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One main reason why life sentencing is so often contested against is the idea that continually harshly punishing a child for an action does not give chance for reform, for example “when a drug that has been prescribed for an illness fails to work, the best response is not always to give more of the same medicine.”(Carnell). Solutions offered by opponents to combat life sentencing are shorter sentences paired with reform programs, because "Most youth are likely to mature out of crime”(Jones), that is unless the justice systems makes it difficult for a child delinquent to transition to a law abiding adult. A tragic example of a juvenile being sentenced to life without parole is the case of Sara Kruzan a girl exploited by a man she considered a father, Howard raped her when she was only thirteen and sold her into prostitution and eventually, a “rival pimp gave Sara a horrific choice: either kill Howard or the rival pimp would kill Sara's mother."(Jones) Sara killed Howard and was sentenced to life without parole. In many cases such as Sara’s juveniles do deserve a second chance to be able to become valuable members of society, though it is unfair to assume that is the case for all juvenile offender currently serving life. The opposition offers a valuable view on incarceration, however many of the viewpoints are relied heavily on emotion, lacking facts and…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays