Preview

Essay On The Crittenden Compromise

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
440 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On The Crittenden Compromise
What if the American Civil War never happened? It could have if the Crittenden Compromise would have passed. The Crittenden Compromise was one of the last attempts to stop a war from happening in America. The Crittenden Compromise is one cause of the Civil War. It would have allowed the southern states to have slaves, and the northern to not. It also would have allowed the Confederates to maintain their beliefs in slavery being useful and right.

First, the Crittenden Compromise was important to the history of America because it let the south have slaves, and the north to ban them forever. The Crittenden Compromise was written by Senator John J. Crittenden in December, 1860. It had six amendments and it stated that north of 36°30' latitude would not be allowed slaves, but the south would. It was denied from passing Congress by Republicans and Abraham Lincoln. The Republicans denied it because they wanted more areas to have slaves, however Lincoln opposed it because he believed that there should be less area.

Next, the Crittenden Compromise was an important part of American history because it may have prevented fighting over slavery in the future. Amendment two in the Crittenden Compromise says that Congress can not ban
…show more content…

These amendments were written to let all states south of 36°30' latitude to have slaves. However, to have slaves north of the line was illegal. Slavery would be legal in the District of Columbia as long as it was apart of Virginia and Maryland, and/or with the consent from the citizens to ban it. The confederates were fighting for slavery to be in more places, and because most of them lived in the North they disagreed with it. Even though John Crittenden wrote it in hopes of preventing a war, it still wasn't a good enough compromise for both

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    * Compromise proposed by Sen John Crittenden of KY proposed constitutional amdts w/ permanent slavery in slave states, fugitive slave returned. At heart was plan to reinstitute Missouri Compromise Line for western lands…

    • 2797 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Missouri Compromise was also important because it was successful, unlike future compromises. The Missouri compromise was successful for a number of reasons, not just because Congress was perfectly willing…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Dbq

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page

    The compromise of 1850 was a document constructed by Henry Clay to ease tensions between North and South. The compromise consisted of the following five points—(1) writing a new fugitive slave law, since beforehand white citizens could give runaway slaves room and board and not be penalized, therefore appeasing the South, (2) annexing California as a free state to the Union, an advantage to the North, (3) prohibiting the slave trade, but not slavery itself, in the District of Columbia, (4) reorganizing the Mexican Cession into the New Mexico and Utah territories with the slavery issue being decided by popular sovereignty, and (5) declaring a border between Texas and New Mexico, with $10 million in reparations for the territory Texas surrendered…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the beginning of westward expansion, the issue of slavery in the newly settles territory became an important and dividing political issue. The Missouri Compromise tried to reach an agreement between the North and South, admitting Maine as a free state, but Missouri as a slave state. Although the Missouri Compromise was unsuccessful in satisfying the North and South, it was important in that it marked the boundary for slavery in the territory…

    • 1451 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though compromises and agreements look straight forward, the parties involved usually have ulterior motives. The Compromise of 1877 was consisted of a few main point. It called for the withdrawal of all federal troops from the South, supported internal improvements in the South and promised to appoint at least one Southerner to the cabinet. Also it gave conservative Southern Democrats some control over their local patronage and gave the South a free hand in race relations. Many may have seen these details as a way to mend the country back together, however it was really just a despicable plan. Although the Compromise of 1877 was successful in burying sectional tensions, in reality, it was a cynical political deal because it was a fraudulent election, white conservatives maintained power, and blacks became disenfranchised.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Missouri Compromise created a temporary balance of slave v. free states until the Kansas-Nebraska Act. It decreased the arguing in senate about which states would be free or slave. But in the long term, we can argue that the Missouri Compromise created the clear barrier between north and south that would not come together until the end of the Civil War and was a prime reason for the Civil…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Missouri Compromise reflected regional differences toward slavery in that the North and South had opposite opinions about the issue. The North was against using slaves while the South was for it. The 36-30 latitude line essentially divided the country between North and South, as the area above the line prohibited slavery, which they were fine with anyways as the North didn’t use and was against using slaves. The area below the line and Missouri were allowed to use slaves, which made sense as the area below the line was the South, who actually used the slaves and didn’t want to end the use of the slave system. This 36-30 latitude line was a physical reflection of the differing viewpoints on slavery between the North and the South, as it reflected the ideals of the North and…

    • 2099 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution was made in order to keep peace between its people however, certain topics were not talked about. As an emerging country many new problems and situations occurred and were brought up. Economically the North and the South were completely different. The constitution failed to address slavery, which was important to the South By not addressing this topic the North and the South began having tension between each other. Not talking about slavery backfired because the North and the South disagreed on the topic of slavery and they eventually went to war, due to the differences based on the constitution.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1787 the three-fifths compromise was enacted. It was one of the most controversial topics at the time. The three-fifths compromise was a way for southerners to ensure that they weren’t out-numbered in the House of Representative. James Williams, a northern coincidentally proposed the three-fifths act. It didn’t benefit the north because they…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three-fifths compromise was system in between the states to determine a person who is enslaved as a three-fifths of a person. The south was overpopulated and continued to grow due to slavery James Wilson proposed this in 1787 and this showed how proslavery was forced during those times. Because the Virginia Plan was denied, the three-fifths compromise was suggested and made the cut for the south to be powerfully represented in the House of Representatives and have too much power when electing presidents. Compared to the northerner states they seemed to disregard slavery. The difference between he northerner states and southern was that the northerner states counted one free man as one vote and one slave not a vote to southern states counting the slaves as a vote as well as one free man as a vote.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sectionalism Dbq

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    During the 1860 election, if Stephen Douglas were to be elected, the country would continue to function with individual state’s deciding the law. This would have delayed the war, but the tension between the north and south was increasing, and a decision would eventually have had to be made. The North and South were unable to compromise; all political parties stood their ground on the issue and rejected proposed plans such as the Crittenden Compromise; which would extend the Missouri Compromise to the pacific (Divine 475).…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The compromises from 1846 to 1861 were, by their intentions, to postpone the struggle between the north and the south temporarily but not to solve it. The foundational problems, like the the slavery itself, the differences in social structure and economic system and the expansion of slavery, were left. The increasing struggle between the abolitionists and slave owners and between the newly formed Republican Party and the Democratic Party kept putting those questions in front of the US people. The compromises themselves failed to satisfy the wants of both sides, enraged the north and frightened the south, so up to the election of Lincoln, the tension built up to a climax and finally broke out to become a civil war.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dred Scott Case Study

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Supreme Court in this case, essentially threw out the Missouri Compromise, which was essentially only legislation keeping the battle between free states and slave states at bay. The Missouri Compromise was the only remaining bandage left covering the wound between the northern and southern states, due to the division of slave ownership. The reason behind labeling the Missouri Compromise as unconstitutional is due to the fact that congress has no power to pass any legislature concerning personal property, and by doing so would infringe upon individuals personal rights. However, if all of the above was not enough to frighten the state rights fighters, then the fact that this Supreme Court decision essentially stripped states the right to decide whether or not they wanted to allow or ban slavery would most likely be the cherry on top. Due to the fact that the Missouri Compromise was deemed unconstitutional, the federal government could no longer ban slavery in certain states, therefore allowing for any state to support or ban slavery at will. The problem with this initiative was the fact that there would not be an imbalance in the house and senate due to the unequal influx of free and slave states, which means less state representation.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Missouri Compromise outlawed the growth of slavery and involuntary servitude above the Mason Dixon Line which is located north of thirty-six degrees and thirty minutes, north latitude. Since slavery was outlawed in the north it limited the growth of slavery across the country. The North did not like idea of slavery because they had the same idea of abolitionist. There was also a greater consequence for having slaves. The idea of abolitionist was to outlaw slavery because the need for slaves was very low in the northern part of the country.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The only reason the 13th amendment came to be was because the Civil War broke slaveries stronghold over politics and constitutional development. In 1787 the constitution always was protecting slavery. The document did not say the word slavery, but everyone knew what it meant. The Civil War helped slavery…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays