Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Presidential Elections
Over the course of centuries, the United States of America has had many different Presidents, senators, and other government officials. Though no two government officials are alike, one similarity that many of them have is wealth. Typically, one must run a campaign and convince the public that they are fit to rule in order to be appointed to a position of power in government. These campaigns often require a large amount of money, that is covered by donations, sponsors, or personal income. Often times, donations and great ideas are not enough to win a political campaign, and sponsors or personal income are needed. Candidates capable of funding their own campaigns are typically millionaires or even billionaires. In order to have a good chance
…show more content…
For example, candidates that win may be wealthy businessmen and successful attorneys, that have difficulty relating to the wants and needs of the everyday person. They also might be unable to fully understand the needs of the poor because they have never experienced that level of poverty and lack the knowledge on policies that can aid people living below the poverty line. Policies on education, healthcare, and worker's benefits may be left unaddressed or poorly thought out because of the discord between the socioeconomic classes. Another con is that the voice of the poor is not heard when only wealthy people are in office. In addition to wealthy politicians being unable to relate to the desires of those less fortunate, they may never hear them. Without representation, poor and middle class people lose the opportunity to vocalize their desires and provide guidance in government.
In contrast, some may see the benefits or pros to having wealthier candidates in power. When a successful businessman or woman takes a position of power, it is believed that they will treat the economy like their business and bolster it. Typically, they have a strong background with finance and can provide good insight on how to increase wealth. This can create jobs and opportunities for those who are less fortunate. They may also participate in global trade and have a good understanding of how the
For example, candidates that win may be wealthy businessmen and successful attorneys, that have difficulty relating to the wants and needs of the everyday person. They also might be unable to fully understand the needs of the poor because they have never experienced that level of poverty and lack the knowledge on policies that can aid people living below the poverty line. Policies on education, healthcare, and worker's benefits may be left unaddressed or poorly thought out because of the discord between the socioeconomic classes. Another con is that the voice of the poor is not heard when only wealthy people are in office. In addition to wealthy politicians being unable to relate to the desires of those less fortunate, they may never hear them. Without representation, poor and middle class people lose the opportunity to vocalize their desires and provide guidance in government.
In contrast, some may see the benefits or pros to having wealthier candidates in power. When a successful businessman or woman takes a position of power, it is believed that they will treat the economy like their business and bolster it. Typically, they have a strong background with finance and can provide good insight on how to increase wealth. This can create jobs and opportunities for those who are less fortunate. They may also participate in global trade and have a good understanding of how the