Presidency is a strong idea in America. It elects our highest executive leader, the president. A good strong, experienced president is a viable resource. Just to be clear, a president should be experienced in someway . They should first occupied a spot in government such as a governor or senator. They will have a voice and understanding in politics, know about foreign policies and politics, and they will know their way around the government. Think about, who would want a presidential candidate without any political experience or would they? As history has shown, freshness has ruled. Even today, presidential candidate Donald Trump is winning. He has no political experience, however he has considered by New York Republicans to be governor in October 2013, but he never ran. This is the most controversial question in politics, maybe. Should amateurs be allowed in the oval office?
A presidential candidate should have at least have held a spot in government. They should have been a senator or governor before becoming chief executive. Hey …show more content…
It trades with many, many countries. We have good reputations with most of them others not so good. That’s why a president should know foreign policies. They should know how to negotiate with other countries. Also how to make alliances with other countries during times of war and help those allies. They should informed and updated on current global events. Mexico and Canada are one of our biggest allies. We and them are part of NAFTA which basically means we trade and sort of protect them. Say Mexico is being attacked by another country and the president did not react at all. The US should always be involved with world/foreign politics and/or