Preview

Essays

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
674 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essays
The Cripps mission was an attempt in late March 1942 by the British government to secure Indian cooperation and support for their efforts in World War II. The mission was headed by Sir Stafford Cripps, a senior left-wing politician and government minister in the War Cabinet of Prime Minister Winston Churchill.
Cripps in India
Upon his arrival in India, Cripps held talks with Indian leaders. He began by offering India full dominion status at the end of the war, with the chance to secede from the Commonwealth and go for total independence. Privately, grant India Dominion Status with immediate effect, reserving only the Defence Ministry for the British.
However, in public, he failed to present any concrete proposals for greater self-government in the short term, other than a vague commitment to increase the number of Indian members of the Viceroy's Executive Council. Cripps spent much of his time in encouraging Congress leaders and Jinnah to come to a common, public arrangement in support of the war and government.
There was little trust between the British and Congress by this stage, and both sides felt that the other was concealing its true plans. The Congress stopped talks with Cripps and, guided by Gandhi, the national leadership demanded immediate self-government in return for war support. Gandhi said that Cripp's offer of Dominion Status after the war was a "post-dated cheque drawn on a crashing bank".
Causes of Failure
The three reasons have been given for the failure the Cripps mission: 1) Gandhi's opposition led the Indian National Congress to reject the British offer; 2) Cripps' modification of the original British offer, which provided for no real transfer of power; 3) behind-the-scenes efforts of the Viceroy and Secretary of State for India to sabotage the mission. Hence it concludes that documents released in 1970 support the third interpretation.
Long term impact
The long-term significance of the Cripps Mission really became apparent only in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The goal of The Indian National Congress was to gain and maintain independence from the British forces. The Indian National Congress formed and held its first meeting in 1885, one of those in attendance was Mahatma Gandhi, who would become the leader of the group. At first, the NIC professed loyalty to the British, but with World War 1 breaking out in 1914 and lasting until 1920, the NIC gradually became an opponent the British government. As the tolerance or the British decreased, the Indians strength increased. Indians began to realize that the British were not such a force to be reckoned with. (Indian Independence Movement,…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    India Dbq Analysis

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The British took all political power from the Indian government. For example of the 960 civil offices that controlled the civil administration of India, 900 were ran by British Men and the other 60 offices were ran by the natives of India (Doc. 2). Also the Indians had no power to change taxation (Doc. 2). In document 1 it says “For a hundred years you have done everything for us. You have given us no responsibility for our own government.”…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nevertheless, we find ourselves in the middle of a war. This war is the result of Axis powers wanting to conquer the world. Now, we are making a supreme effort to defeat those who want to take away freedom around the world.” And then later says this,”I hope that our shared interest in democracy will unite your countrymen and mine. We must join together to defeat our common enemy.” Meaning that he is conscious of what is happening right now and recognizes that they need to bring peace, freedom and order. Next, he knows that they need to do all they can in order to beat the enemies, and with this he will need to be allies with India, because then, his men and India’s men will unite to win. Kind of agreeing with the deal. After that, the main idea of the article is that Gandhi and President Roosevelt are discussing a way of becoming allies to win WWII but also have something in return, all of this is said through letters. I can prove this is the main idea because the article says that, Gandhi said,”Britain must immediately end its rule of…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the Viceroy also says afterwards, “Whose authority is directly denied by large and powerful elements in India’s national life”. This quote is saying that divisions within India are slowing down the progression of gaining power for India. Even England’s power over India is being disrupted by the divisions within India. If a specialist governing country is struggling to stay in control how is an inexperienced country going to handle one of the largest countries in the world? Linlithgow made the August offer in 1940; along with Jinnah they discussed a whole range of issues regarding India and the war. The Viceroy did make an effort to involve the Muslim community with the proposals in the august offer as well. One of the proposals was “an assurance that the government would not adapt any new…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With many politicians believing the British were civilising the peoples of periphery, the British probably believed the peoples of the American colonies needed to be taught to respect the metropole, which believed it had a parent role. In contrast, in the Indian case acts of resistance had yield some success. It could, however, be argued that the war a make factor in this success. As Fieldhouse points out: Stafford Cripps promised India dominion status ‘to rally Indian opinion in the crisis caused by Japan’s entry into the war’ (Secondary Source 19.2, 2015, p.10). As well as the civil disobedience, which was part of the ‘Quit India’ campaign, the British were also concerned about the Japanese-back ‘Indian National Army’ who had have some military success. In this context, then, the British high likely perceived those whom taken in the civil disobedience as moderates. As Indian support was needed to fight Japan, the British probably felt placating moderates was a small price to pay considering the circumstances. Therefore, the circumstances of war played in a major factor in Indian progress towards…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 10 of Essential Gandhi discusses several actions the British carried out in India and the Indians’ response to those actions. For instance, when the British passed the Rowlatt Bill, Indians went on a hartal, prayed, and did not eat. In Essential Gandhi chapter 11, Gandhi discusses the current state of India’s government and the ways to change the government and India’s current state. The British utilized force, acquired the participation of Indians, and caused the Indians to heavily rely on them. Gandhi proposed to remove the Secret Service in India and have the Indians control their education instead of relying on the British government. In order to reduce poverty, Gandhi suggested to incorpate “spinning” into India’s society.[140]Furthermore,…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gandhi¡¦s initial thrust had been towards unifying Indian natives under this banner of non-violence in order to garner support for an ouster of the British from India and an overhaul of the Indian government structure. What this meant was that Gandhi was looking for a ¡¥fundamental change¡¦ in the structure and hierarchies of the Indian state. This is highlighted in his writings: ¡§The state after withdrawal (of the Colonizers) will depend largely upon the manner of it. If, as you assume, they (the Colonizers) retire, it seems to me we shall still keep their constitution and shall carry on the government.¡¨…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The British rule was clearly not accepted in India because of the noticeable divide in India. Source 1 is a letter from Queen Victoria complaining about the viceroy and questions whether he is a successful viceroy. The viceroy, Curzon, never showed any interest in India but he still decides to be the viceroy of India. The source says that he ‘tramples’ on the Indian people. India wouldn’t be happy about the fact that he is English but he is also a very poor viceroy. This shows that he has no support of the Indian people which he desperately needs for him to be successful. Source 1 is also written by the Queen which shows that Curzon obviously isn’t doing a good job as viceroy if the Queen is getting involved. It was also a private letter so the source is likely going to be a strong and valuable source because at the time it wasn’t published. Source 2 is a letter to a Kesari newspaper talking about India’s freedom. In terms of power, India had no freedom under the British rule. India was dominated by Britain and didn’t have any influence in India. The source has evidence that India believed that their ‘condition wouldn’t be any better by the exchange of the British rule’. Separatism is very much alive in India and there is a lack of trust between the two nations. Just like in source 3,…

    • 809 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By European principles in the political area being brought to India by the British, political and social reform in India was able to be achieved. The western education led to Indians coming across European principles (human rights, freedom of speech, liberalism, etc.) That was a contrast though to the imperialism practiced by the British in India. One third of the subcontinent was ruled by Indian princes, but under the supervision of the British. The rest were controlled by the Viceroy (administered by roughly one thousand members of the civil service). So the knowledge of principles such as autonomy and freedom led to many Indians wanting the same thing for their own nation since it appeared to them that the world's most powerful nations were those who were self-governing democracies which was obviously a successful system. Part of their desires also came from the Indians wanting their native religion and customs to be respected.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essays

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    • You are to create a Research report on the results that you have collected at Camp Kedron during your excursion.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    essays

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Throughout the world it has become an issue that celebrity stars cannot have full freedom. Many tragedies, car accidents have happened and harm our community just because one decided to stalk another. Many of the audience does not realize this and reality of paparazzi. Sean Burke a papparazzi reform initiative writes personal experience from the issue. He argues that Paparazzi are all about the money, stalking biggest stars, breaking rules, becoming danger to public safety, and a cause of death. Gabe Rottman a representative of American Civil liberties union argues that constitution prtotects everyones's rights. To burke he views this limitation differently. Sean Burkes believes that there should be a limit to paparazi.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Sepoy Rebellion

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages

    India has a history of being a fractured nation, at times this disunity was even able to save them from being taken over by conquerors like Alexander the Great. However, their luck was doomed to run out. India has always been a country rich in resources, making it natural prey to the British imperialists who not only wished to exploit these resources but the people of India as well. With a viewpoint such as this, it’s simple to see why Indian's view of British Imperialists evolved into yet another divided nation, with some coming to accept and see the benefits of Britain's political control, while others couldn’t come to terms with how easily the British system disregarded them and how altered it was from the once great Mughal Empire. Despite…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Master Mountbatten was advised by Prime Minister Attlee to hand over the ability to the Indians by first June 1948. The Prime Minister in a letter guided the emissary to do his most extreme to keep the solidarity of India.…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a way of intervening, the emergency committee urged the British to help but nothing. It became apparent that the British were not willing to face the Lehi and the Irgun. The British administration was willing to risk British lives only if there were British interests but in this case, there was none. This explains why British Mandatory was slowly coming to an end, and the British had no plans to renew their stay.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Foreign Policy 51 64essay

    • 1175 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The first set of failures in foreign policy during this period can be traced back to the re-elected Churchill, whose refusal to accept Britain’s diminished post-war role. A key mistake this led to was Churchill’s complete intolerance of any further decolonisation, despite the beginnings of the breakup of the Empire as far back as 1947 with India’s & Pakistan’s independence, Churchill’s delusions of Imperialism cost Britain greatly, his stubborn stance against decolonisation led to many violent uprisings, most notably in Malaya and the Mau Mau rebellion in Kenya, both costly and ultimately unsuccessful for Britain. In took until MacMillan before decolonisation sped up, this meant a period of far too long when Britain attempted to cling on to the Empire, a very costly mistake. Britain’s global status was further diminished when Churchill’s key foreign policy of a ‘3-power Summit’ was dashed, again this highlighted that Britain was no longer a world-power but was yet realise the fact. As Dean Acheson – a US diplomat – said, “Britain has lost an Empire and has not yet found a role,” a sentiment applicable no more so than to Winston Churchill.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays