The data of fluorimetric method, ∆F and F-ratio, treatment was done using OLS, LMS and IRLS in both cases of linearity. The values of recovery % were in the accepted ranges (98-102%) indicating the good accuracy of the method obtained after treatment of data, such effect is highly significant in the non-ideal case as they came closer to 100%. For example in Table 24, in non-ideal case, for ∆F-method, upon using LMS regression, the values of mean recovery% of concentration levels 20, 40 and 60 µg/mL increased from 91.20 % to 100.23%. In the same time, the RSD% for the different concentration levels used in the study showed a great decrease in their values upon applying both LMS and IRLS robust regression methods. This indicates that the proposed robust, non-parametric methods are superior and totally valid for the estimation of the unknown drug concentrations in the whole linearity range with acceptable accuracy and
The data of fluorimetric method, ∆F and F-ratio, treatment was done using OLS, LMS and IRLS in both cases of linearity. The values of recovery % were in the accepted ranges (98-102%) indicating the good accuracy of the method obtained after treatment of data, such effect is highly significant in the non-ideal case as they came closer to 100%. For example in Table 24, in non-ideal case, for ∆F-method, upon using LMS regression, the values of mean recovery% of concentration levels 20, 40 and 60 µg/mL increased from 91.20 % to 100.23%. In the same time, the RSD% for the different concentration levels used in the study showed a great decrease in their values upon applying both LMS and IRLS robust regression methods. This indicates that the proposed robust, non-parametric methods are superior and totally valid for the estimation of the unknown drug concentrations in the whole linearity range with acceptable accuracy and