Often we might not think of consequences a decision might have. In that scenario, we should always have a backup plan that can be used in case of need. For instance, in the story “Shooting an elephant”, George Orwell had a variety of options to choose from. Either he could not kill the elephant and control the villagers to be calm and continue with their work or come with him and see him shoot the elephant. He chose to go with the second one i.e. to kill the elephant which would make some respect for him in the villagers though under moral pressure. For these type of situations, it is always nice to have one or two plans in case one …show more content…
He might take more ethical or moral decisions if he is well educated and is aware of what is right or wrong. On the contrary, if he has gone to a school where the level of education is low and not much attention is given to the students therefore, he might take decisions selfishly and without considering its effects on others. This might be due to the fact that they were pushed to the wall to fight for their rights in the past. For example, in the story “Growing good corn”, the farmer was experienced and educated. Instead of giving a hard time to his neighbors for their inferior quality of corn, he helped them. He took this decision selflessly; in a way he might have encouraged his neighbors to grow a superior quality corn. He did not consider if his neighbors might stand up against him. Therefore, one can take decisions depending upon how and where he grew up and what his education level is. Depending on all these factors, one might take decisions morally or