Preview

Ethical Use Of Drones Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
801 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethical Use Of Drones Essay
The Central Intelligence Agency or in other words known as the CIA have recently used drones to help detect and destroy terrorist before they do damage to our country and civilians. In the article Rethinking The Criterion For Assessing Cia-Targeted Killings: Drones, Proportionality And Jus Ad Vim, by Megan Braun and Daniel Brunstetter, the authors convey a determined tone to portray the aspects of drones scanning civilians to detect terrorist. “In his 2012 speech on the morality, legality and prudence of the USA’s use of drones to carry out lethal strikes against suspected terrorists, John Brennan (2012) (then White House counterterrorism adviser and now director of Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)) lauded the ability of drones to ‘conform to the principle of proportionality, the notion that the anticipated collateral damage of an action cannot be excessive in relation to the anticipated military advantage.” The use of drones can prevent the military and terrorist to kill innocent people having nothing to do witht the feud going on. In the article, Rethinking The Criterion For Assessing Cia-Targeted Killings: Drones, Proportionality And Jus Ad Vim, by …show more content…
Drones can save lives as easily as they are able to take them away. They may be light and we may believe they may not cause damage to anything or anyone but when a drone is falling from the sky heading thousands of feet to the ground it can cause severe damage to people, buildings, and other sacred things we have. If drones are being designed to stop terrorist attacks and saves lives they should be tested numerous amount of times before they are anywhere near a town searching for possible suspects. People put their trust in the government to keep them safe, and if falling drones is what is going to kill them instead of a terrorist attack it would be okay to go against wanting to have drones circulation the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    I the Current Administration's Policy on Drone Strikes Constitutional
    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I the Current Administration's Policy on Drone Strikes Constitutional

    On September 11, 2001, everything changed. Terrorism had never been seen on such a massive scale. As a result of the massive attacks on U.S. soil, changes had to be enacted. The fight against terror was now a global war effort. The War on Terror was not a popular choice, but it no one expected it to go on for this long. It is now being fought by technology, which led to the drones being used against U.S. citizens suspected of terrorism. The president can authorize these strikes with the claim that these citizens pose an imminent danger to the security of the United States. However, the Obama administration’s definition of imminent threat is vague and without oversight or any checks and balances. There are various military, governmental, and ethical concerns regarding the use of drone strikes ordered by the president. The use of drones is valid, but the administration has not presented any valid defense of their tactics, which paints a poor picture of Oval Office tactical policy.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of CIA Drone Strikes
    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of CIA Drone Strikes

    CIA drone strikes have the potential to decimate terrorist organizations in an inexpensive manner and reduces boots on the ground combat for American soldiers. Though, we need expansive and additional congressional oversight of drone strikes and CIA targeting. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) is devoted to regulating and reviewing every aspect of the drone program, however, committee members are often met with denial and restriction of information. We need to make sure our drone program is met with regulation and preemptive strikes must be strictly reviewed in a legal manner prior to, in order to prevent the endangerment of innocent civilians, radicalization and mobilization of extremest retaliation, and to preserve the reputation…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Michael Sandel Doing The Right Thing Analysis
    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Michael Sandel Doing The Right Thing Analysis

    Just because we have the technological power to use drones to take people/things out, that does not necessarily mean that we should. The main concern being brought up, that while we as a nation may have always killed people with a certain form of ease in the name of war, it has come at a high cost. It is expensive, and not too easy. However, with this drone system it is easier, less expensive, and does not require so much blood shed. This is an area of concern because this may become us as a nation to become much more relaxed when it comes to moral…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare: A Rhetorical Analysis
    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Drone Warfare: A Rhetorical Analysis

    One of the main points of opposition to the use of drones is that they cause far too many civilian casualties. Anderson looks into this idea and proves that this point is widely over exaggerated by stating that the media provides false information over the number of civilian casualties and in the worst case, there are on average only one eighth to two and a half civilian deaths for every drone strike launched. By Anderson using numbers and data to back up his ideas, it makes it hard to argue against that specific side as you would be arguing against straight up facts.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Using Drones
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Using Drones

    When we're using drones, we're putting a meaningless drone's life at risk rather than a soldier's. Drones are just helpful technology that have no psychology connections to the world. Meanwhile, soldiers are humans with bonds to friends and family. A soldier dying and losing his connection to the world would have much more of an impact than a technological tool. If a drone were to get shot while entering a country to spy, we would just find a new drone. But if a soldier were to do the same, there would be a massive impact to the people the soldier had interacted with. Meaning drones are irrelevant to the…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moral and Ethical Implications of Predator Drones
    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Moral and Ethical Implications of Predator Drones

    Drone Strikes are popular tools of all countries, especially the United States, seeking to neutralize suspected terrorists. Even though the American public is divided on the issue and the Pakistani public, where U.S. drones have been used the most, is sternly against the use of drones, they remain the weapon of choice for our military. This started with the Bush Administration in the early 2000s, the U.S. government has attacked hundreds of targets in northwestern Pakistan alone. Regardless of the moral or ethical questions, drone strikes…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Drone War Is Still A War Summary
    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Drone War Is Still A War Summary

    Plaw states that one point in favor of drones is that they are weakening Al Qaeda, the taliban and affiliated groups. Also, they have a primary responsibility for protecting their own civilians. “Second, I doubt that ending drone strikes would substantially reduce anti-Americanism in the Islamic world or put a dent in radical recruitment.” However, that might be true, but they are still costing the lives of innocent civilians of those lives being women and children. Plaw says that to avoid these casualties drones can be sent out with a clearer justification of what it is going to do. He also explains that the drones are a lot less harmful to civilians then they are to Al Qaeda affiliates. The civilian casualties can be minimized therefore drones aren’t as dangerous as some…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Drone Strikes
    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Drone Strikes

    They soar overhead collect intel and are capable of destroying a whole city! Drones often fly in the sky and you don't even notice them because they seem like regular airplanes,but they are capable of much more than just flying around.These Unmanned Aerial Vehicles spy on you daily. Drones should be illegal because they kill innocent humans, promote terrorism, and are expensive to maintain.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drones In Warfare Essay
    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones In Warfare Essay

    Should drones be used in warfare? It’s necessary to learn about drones—what they are, and how they are used—before determining the answer. The Air Force calls them Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, or simply UVAs. There are dozens of them flying over countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, providing intelligence and surveillance. Since September 11, 2001, the US has been fighting the “War on Terror”, in which drones are used to kill suspected terrorists. Drones have changed the pattern of warfare and military outcomes.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The CIA Enhanced Interrogation Techniques
    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The CIA Enhanced Interrogation Techniques

    It would seem that the Drone Campaign was activated in it's place as an effort to combat terrorism. Even though the first drone strike was ordered in 2004 it wasn't until after the enhanced interrogation program was abandoned that drone strikes rapidly increased. An estimated 51 strikes occurred during the Bush administration ending in early January of 2009. The first drone strike under the Obama administration occurred on January 23, 2009. By December of that year the CIA recorded it's 100th drone strike.8 An estimated total of 350 drone strikes9 have been ordered under the Obama administration resulting in at least 2,400 deaths10. With the question of morality it's hard to comprehend that there are those that believe drone strikes are more moral than EITs. Especially when looking into the fact that strikes are ordered on 'suspected' terrorists while EITs are performed on those working with or known to be terrorists. All that aside collateral damage needs to be taken into consideration as well. The act of EITs doesn't result in collateral damage whereas it does with drone strikes. Even if this is dismissed it would be hard for one to argue that drone strikes provide more intelligence than EITs. After all, how can a suspected terrorist provide information if he's dead? Because the drone campaign is now targeting suspected terrorists some believe the United…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis
    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drone Home Analysis

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drones Civil Liberties
    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Drones Civil Liberties

    The notion that these drones will be a safer means of collection is in agreement everywhere, it removes individuals such as informants wearing wires from harm’s way and allows our law enforcement agencies to view locations for possible danger before attempting to serve criminal warrants. The question becomes are your civil liberties being violated with information being gathered as the drone passes over your location?…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drones Argumentative Essay
    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drones Argumentative Essay

    On the other hand the argument can be made that drones are invading the privacies of people and are a nuisance that will lead to a more robotic sky than a natural one. These are true and are concerns for the future, drones have a number of more benefits than cons. Drones provide a more stress free life and will lead to a more productive society because of their ability to be mobile and compact. Drones are the way of the future and will be seen more in the news and in more controversial debates but they are the best way to go heading into the future so they should be allowed to…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Terrorism: Meaning of Life and Oxford University Press
    • 2952 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Terrorism: Meaning of Life and Oxford University Press

    In his article “Terrorism,” Michael Walzer describes terrorism as the indiscriminate murder of innocent people. He goes on to explain that terrorists have the objective of destroying the morale of a nation and instilling fear within a society by not targeting a specific group of people, but rather, targeting the population as a whole and killing “random” people. Walzer and many like-minded philosophers share the view that terrorism is wrong and is not justified under any circumstances; thus rendering it akin to murder. The preceding view is referred to as the “the dominant view,” as labeled by Lionel K. McPherson, because it is common to a great deal of people – many of who are not philosophers. McPherson attempts to discredit the notion that terrorism is wrong by relating it to modern warfare and showing the ways in which it is better in comparison. After reading the opposing arguments presented by Walzer and McPherson, I will be proving that although terrorism is not as immoral as war, it is still wrong.…

    • 2952 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Strikes In The United States
    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drone Strikes In The United States

    While drones contain the advanced technology to guarantee the target will be annihilated, they cannot ensure that bystanders will not be harmed. For instance, in November of 2015, the US targeted 41 Taliban men and unfortunately 1,147 civilians were also killed in the drone strike. Residents in Pakistan, and other drone monitored countries constantly live in fear of when the next drone strike could occur. Additionally, between January 2009 and at the end of 2015, the United States government stated that between 64 and 116 non-combatants were devastatingly killed in a drone strike which only targeted one terrorist. The major opponents against drone usage, Economists, argue that if the family of a Pakistani man died in the midst of a drone strike, he may seek justice on the United States. Moreover, the father and husband of the deceased family could join the Taliban to plot his revenge against our country, therefore creating an additional terrorist fighting against the United…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics