HU4640
3/29/14
Unit 1 Assignment 3
Would You Throw the Switch In reading the Ethics problem box regarding the Trolley Problem I will attempt to answer the question of would I throw the switch. I have had the chance to research different profiles to try and answer this question. The first profile is Ayn Rand. I don’t think that she would have thrown the switch base off her theory about the “virtue of selfishness”. Her theory promotes the philosophy of Individualism. Individualism states the moral stance, political philosophy, ideology, or social outlook that emphasizes the moral worth of the individual. Individualists promote the exercise of one's goals and desires and so value independence and self-reliance and advocate that interests of the individual should achieve precedence over the state or a social group. The Second profile is Jeremy Bentham. He would have thrown the switch based of a principle of Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes utility, usually defined as maximizing happiness and reducing suffering. In this case the trolley would have killed the one person instead of the group of people. The Third profile Immanuel Kant, believed in a transcendental idealism. To be honest this is a very complex topic to define. Mr. Kant believed that ideas, the raw matter of knowledge, must somehow be due to realities existing independently of human minds, but he held that such things in themselves must remain forever unknown. Human knowledge cannot reach to them because knowledge can only arise in the course of synthesizing the ideas of sense. To put it shortly I would say yes he most likely would have thrown the switch just on mere principle of doing what he thought is the correct action. Yes I would have thrown the switch because I tend to side with the utilitarian approach to this problem. Reason is because I can save multiple lives by sacrificing one for the good of all. What would bother me most about the trolley car wrecks would have been the fact that it was my decision. I was put in this position to make a split decision and no matter the outcome someone is going to be the loser.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
However, I only have the ability to save one at this time. It is during impossible circumstances like these that we should consider the advice of those who came before us. John Stuart Mill was a noted English philosopher during the 19th century who followed a utilitarian approach to such dilemmas. He believed that the right answer was the one which would help the most people. St. Thomas Aquinas was an Italian philosopher who taught us to follow our conscience, to follow our heart and do what we believe is right.…
- 834 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Trolley Dilemma is a thought experiment where there is a runaway train and it is heading down the tracks towards five workers you cannot directly do anything to stop the train, but you happen to be standing by a lever that will switch the tracks, only problem is there one man on the other track. And by pulling the lever you will kill him only instead, so you kill one as an alternative to killing five. The other scenario is, imagine you are standing on a bridge seeing all of this happen and you by chance notice a very fat man standing on the bridge with you, he is leaning over the edge and you know that if you…
- 385 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
I would first have to examine the people in question (98). If I somehow knew that the five-year-old girl could grow up to be a doctor and save lives and the other five people were all just crack heads who did not contribute to society, I would save the one life. However, if they were all equal, then I would save the five lives. I ultimately want the people of the world to have many productive skills that they can utilize to make the world a better place.…
- 781 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Consider what might be the ultimate dilemma of ethics and include the answer to each of the following questions:…
- 1024 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Alternatively explain what you would do if you are in any of the following situations, and show your understanding of what a dilemma is.…
- 724 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
* A utilitarian would say that it was for the benefit of three others, when otherwise all 4 of them would have died of starvation…
- 2381 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
When this problem was first introduced I had the same decision to pull the switch to save the four guys opposed to letting them all die. But I can say that my reasoning behind the decision has somewhat changed before I looked at the situation as damage reduction and choosing between the lesser of the two but now I look at the situation as being to take into account the right thing to do and what I would want someone else to do for me if I were in that same situation.…
- 273 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
In this essay will be discussing the trolley problem devised by Philippa Foot, and exploring different aspects of utilitarianism in relation the situation. The trolley problem is as follows ‘A train is hurtling down a track and you see that it is going to hit a group of 5 people and will certainly kill them all. However you are standing on a bridge over the line next to a fat man and you are sure that if you pushed him onto the line his bulk would be sufficient to stop the train before it hit the group of people, would you push him?’.…
- 309 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Suppose you are the driver of a trolley car hurtling down the track at sixty miles an hour. Up ahead you see ve workers standing on the track, tools in hand. You try to stop, but you can’t. The brakes don’t work.You feel desperate, because you know that if you crash into these ve workers, they will all die. (Let’s assume you know that for sure.) Suddenly, you notice a side track, o to the right. There is a worker on that track, too, but only one.You realize that you can turn the trolley car onto the side track, killing the one worker, but sparing the ve. What should you do? Most people would say, “Turn! Tragic though it is to kill one innocent person, it’s even worse to kill ve.” Sacri cing one life in order to save ve does seem the right thing to do. Now consider another version of the trolley story. This time, you are not the driver but an onlooker, standing on a bridge overlooking the track. (This time, there is no side track.) Down the track comes a trolley, and at the end of the track are ve workers. Once again, the brakes don’t work. The trolley is about to crash into the ve workers. You feel helpless to avert this disaster—until you notice, standing next to you on the bridge, a very heavy man. You could push him o the…
- 3356 Words
- 14 Pages
Better Essays -
1. Should the SEC mandate disclosure of pay ratios? Why or why not? And if so, how should the ratios be determined?…
- 383 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
A 19 year old college student and addicted gambler was pulled over for erratic driving on the Long Island Expressway. He pulled out a toy pistol and pointed it at the officer, he was then shot and killed. Another incident involving a 45 year old cancer patient had the same ending in new Jersey. He walked into a Pizza Shop and pointed a gun at the officers inside eating. Experts believe that they force the cops to kill them as a form of suicide. Suicide is difficult to commit and forcing an officer to kill you takes away the pressure of completing the task. Some insurance companies don’t cover suicide and religions forbid it so it is away of taking the guilt and shame away from common suicide. 10% of fatal police shootings are brought on by people seeking to die.…
- 752 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
problem today is that kids are unaware of their moral values and are unable to define what is…
- 898 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
If I had to drive a truck and dump a truck full of live human beings to save my life , I would be reluctant at first but I would think that if I did refuse then I would just be killed and another person would fill my place and do it no questions asked. Id have to say that this wouldn’t be a great show of character but if they were going to kill me then them, of course I would, but I have a conscience and I wouldn’t be able to live with myself if I carried out in killing those people. So I wouldn’t do it ,part of me…
- 997 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
A recession is caused by many different factors, not just one. It is the coming together of many different problems, all at one time. Some factors that contributed to this last Great Recession include consumer indebtedness, income inequality, lax regulations and the housing bubble. In this paper we will discuss how the Housing Bubble exacerbated and what is its link to the Great Recession. It is necessary to note that because the bursting continues and because lessons have not been learned from previous recessions, nor this one, the problem may remain for a while, fueling this recession further.…
- 2384 Words
- 10 Pages
Best Essays -
Kantian ethical practices mandate that an individual cannot chose a course of action that causes them to become immoral (Wall, 2008). Therefore, when following Kantian ethics, the answer to both of the trolley problems is, no. If the individual were to divert the track to save those five people, they would be directly responsible for the death of the man on the side track. However, because they did not cause the individuals to be on the main track, it is of no direct consequence because of the individual’s inaction. While this may not make sense to many, the reasoning is sound. It is not technically wrong to allow those five people to die. They were on the tracks as a matter of choice, as was the man on the side track. However, in deliberately diverting the track to kill one instead of five, you are immoral because you had no obligation to save the others (Wall, 2008). In Kantian ethics, there is only a clear cut right and wrong (Wall, 2008); Utilitarian ethics are quite different.…
- 692 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays