Ethnographic Analysis Of Sweetbay

To find variations in twenty sweetbay magnolia leaf sizes, I first, found the measurements for the length, width, and surface area (in centimeters) of the individual leaves. Then, I graphed and arranged the data in a table. The leaves are in relatively the same range and size. Most of these leaves are oval-shaped and green in color. The leaves are not flat, and curve outward from one direction.
The leaves measured two and a half to six centimeters in their width, nine to nineteen and two-tenths centimeters in their length, twenty seven and a half to ninety-six and two tenths centimeters squared for area, twenty three to one-hundred three and a half centimeters squared for surface area. This indicates that the leaves mainly differed through their length rather than their widths. The mean and median for the width were only one-tenth apart, and for the length they were two-tenths apart. Both of the length and width had a larger mean. The mean and median of the surface area were contrasted from those of the length and width with a larger difference between the mean and median (five and eight-tenths difference) and a larger median. In fact, the surface area of the leaves contained larger numbers with a larger range. The range of the surface area being eighty and a half compared to the range of the width being three and a half shows the
They were at most a millimeter apart from each other. The mean, median, mode and range for the widths were less precise than the width. While they were relatively in the same number range, they were farther apart than the widths. The mean, median, mode, and range of the surface area were the farthest apart from each other. Ranging from a five to ten centimeter difference, the statistics for the surface area were least precise out of the data set. This leads to the width having a smallest standard deviation and the surface area having the largest standard