The physical material of the structure is entirely stone, which represents a specific selection. While the Etruscans built their temples using exclusively ephemeral materials, the Greeks built with permanent ones. Using stone demonstrates a complete selection of Greek technique and the omission of Etruscan practice.
The frontal elevation appears to be mostly of Greek influence, but a more thorough investigation uncovers the clear presence and juxtaposition of both Greek and Etruscan forces. The floor of the Temple is raised on a high podium that is joined by frontal staircase that leads to the Temple porch, which …show more content…
The walls of the cella are fixed stone combined with engaged columns on the perimeter. The builders were unwilling to sacrifice a Greek colonnade and peristyle or the Etruscan closed-wall construction. This fusion is also paralleled in the directionality of the Temple. The Greeks used a colonnade to create symmetry and openness, while the Etruscans focused mostly on the frontal elevation and built solid walls for the majority of the temple as they neglected symmetry. The design of the ground plan of this temple uses the Etruscan frontal orientation, but also seeks to preserve the pseudo-openness of a Greek temple. Instead, both forms were melded to create a unique ground plan that required Etruscan wall but also included Greek columns.
The Unidentified Temple is forged from Greek and Etruscan styles by utilizing single element construction in the materials, juxtaposition of styles in the elevation, and combination in the ground plan. The Temple’s provenance comes from Greek and Etruscan influences and the various methods in which the styles of each were