Preview

Evaluation Arguments Against Capital Punishment

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1543 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Evaluation Arguments Against Capital Punishment
Evaluation Argument: Capital Punishment

Imagine you live in a small eight foot by eight foot cell, with only a bed and toilet. You are only allowed to leave this cell for maybe an hour per day. For the other twenty-three hours, you are stuck in that cell with nothing to occupy your time, and you know you are going to be there for the rest of your life. Now imagine that instead of spending the rest of your life in that cell, you were sentenced to death. You know the alternative. Which would seem more like a punishment: life in prison without the chance to ever leave, or the easy escape of a slow, painless death? Capital punishment is not justice. Capital punishment fails as an effective form of disciplinary action. Capital punishment is not practiced consistently, and in a 2011 report published by the Death Penalty Information
…show more content…
Studies have found that white juries are more likely to seek the death penalty, and that black jurors are more likely to be struck from the jury because they are unlikely to seek the death penalty. This results in more death penalty cases in white communities with white victims across the nation (DPIC 22). This favoritism based on race is despicable in this day in age. Regarding politics, the chances being granted an appeal rely heavily on whether one has a liberal or conservative judge. Judges appointed by democratic presidents are much more likely to grant appeals than those appointed by republican presidents. For example, judges appointed by Democrat Jimmy Carter gave 89% of their votes in favor of defendants, while judges appointed by Republican George H. W. Bush gave 93% of their votes against defendants (DPIC 25). All of these facts prove that the decisions regarding capital punishment are anything but objective and are influenced by many factors, instead of the crime at hand, and are not consistently

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Frances E.W. Harper (Judy Whipps) was a suffrage leader who represented the Negro Women. Harper was a lecturer and writer who opposed the idea of “only” white women have the right to vote. In 1891, Harper gave a speech to the National Council of women that called for equal rights to vote for African-American men and women. Harper stated in the speech that African-Americans were not dependent on the North and South but “members of the body politic who has a claim upon the nation for justice, simple justice.” Harper’s speech highlights some of the radical slurs and the divide between whites and Negros.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The debate over whether or not capital punishment should be used has gone on for thousands of years. Although the method of capital punishment has changed the idea of it has not. Capital punishment will always have its disadvantages and its advantages. There has always been an intense debate among the people regarding the constitutionality of capital punishment. In my opinion, capital punishment should only be used in harsh cases that the convicted person is proven guilty in.…

    • 78 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Apart from a short time in the mid-to-late 20th century when a freeze on capital punishment was ordered by the U.S. Supreme Court, this system of punishment has been in constant use in the United States for most of its history. Proponents and opponents have always been at odds over whether the practice should be continued or abolished completely. Lining up on one side are those who believe that the practice deters crime and is cheaper than warehousing a criminal for life in a maximum-security prison and lining up on the other side are those that believe the practice is inhumane and fraught with inconsistencies which make it antiquated and a barbaric form of punishment. Even though the United States…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Everybody believes that capital punishment is wrong, but when they look at certain cases, they are quick to say, “Put them to death”, or “scream capital punishment.”” Jeff Lindsay. Capital punishment is the legally authorized killing of someone as a punishment for a crime. It has been around since time itself. In the 1700’s, The Code of Hammurabi was the first known written document there were twenty-five crimes that were punishable by death such as adultery, and helping slaves escape. Only the most heinous of those warranted such a stringent sentence. And while there are many methods that may take a prisoner's life, there are also alternatives. One must ask though, “Do those options do justice to the unspeakable acts these criminals have…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Today, the death penalty is an issue that has raised many questions in regards to its morality. Many people believe that the death penalty is immoral for a number of factors, some of which being the execution of innocents, the arbitrary application of the death penalty, and the racial and economic discrimination with the system. Many others believe that the death penalty is moral, for it gives people what they deserve, the criminals were fully aware of the consequences that may fall upon them, and that justice is being served for the victims and families of the victims still suffering from the actions of the criminal. In this paper I will argue that from a Deontological standpoint, the death penalty is morally just. To do this, I will first describe the basics of the theory of Deontology in general, so that you, the reader, can begin to understand some of the fundamental beliefs that Kant, the father of Deontology,…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is a punishment that results in death usually caused by capital crimes or capital offenses. It is commonly referred to as the death sentence. According to an article “Buzzle” not all countries accept capital punishment but there are still a lot of states who do (par.1). Capital punishment has been around for thousands of years, this punishment is said to have helped keep crime level down and alter the minds of future criminals to prevent them from committing atrocious crimes such as: murder, terrorism, and in some situations aggravated kidnapping.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment is the imposition of a penalty of death by the State. Since the 1970s almost all capital sentences in the United States have been imposed for homicide. Today, 32 states have reinstituted the death penalty. Some 75% of executions now employ lethal injection. The gas chamber, hanging, the firing squad, and most commonly, the electric chair are still used in some states. In 2002 the Federal Court ruled that the death penalty must be imposed through a finding of a jury and not a judge. The states that have reinstituded the death penalty are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, and Wyoming. These states still have the death penelty law. Is hand-for-hand, eye-for-eye an approach of humans?…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death penalty is the punish meant of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime and there are twenty-two countries in the world that still impose the death penalty for capital crimes, the United states is one of them. If you are charged with capital homicide, and the jury of twelve of your peers proclaims, “We find the defendant guilty as charged”(Condenaststore). Then it is simple, you are going to forfeit your life, so abolishing the death penalty or there’s no coming back from the grave.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although many view capital punishment or the death penalty as cruel and unusual punishment it is still strongly used today in the United States. In today’s time people discuss capital punishment when referring to criminals such as the Mason Family, OJ Simpson, Bonnie and Clyde, Osama Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, Tedd Bundy, Amy Fisher, and Al Capone who were all hardcore criminals. However not everyone views capital punishments as cruel and unusual, some have religious factors to consider. Most major world religions take a puzzling position on the morality of capital punishment. Religions are often based on a body of teachings the standards of present-day Western civilization, and the Old Testament. A few public…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone has their views and opinions on the death penalty. They are either for it or against it, but what does that really mean? Sixty-three percent of the population of America are for it because a human being killed another human and they think that it is only fair that the defendant also dies. Then the other thirty-seven percent are against it either because it may have been a loved one that had killed someone and they do not want to see their loved one be killed or they think that killing the person that killed the other person does not give the victim any justice because that they are already dead. (U.S. Death Penalty). But what most people do not know is why or how the death penalty was originated, or why they ended most of the death penalty. The death penalty is painted vividly as immoral and insufficient, while others…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This is it, this is the last time you will ever see daylight again. The dim light of the outside world seems to be overtaken by shadows. You squeeze your eyes shut, and then everything goes dark. That is the death penalty. What exactly is the death penalty? In the dictionary, it is defined as, "the sentence of death upon a person by the state as a punishment for an offense." What the death penalty itself serves is retribution and revenge. Many believe that this is the right way to punish criminals in society, although there are many faults with capital punishment as well. Those faults consist of errors in the system, state costs, and the risks of executions of innocent people. Life in prison without parole is better than the death penalty where the death penalty is the foundation in injustice and it is immoral.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant Death Penalty

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some may argue that the death penalty is an unjust way of punishment. Jeffrey Reiman believes that being sentenced to life in prison without parole is an equal form of punishment that is accepted. “…Life in prison is still life, however unpleasant. In contrast, the death penalty does not just threaten to make life unpleasant—it threatens to take life all together” (Reiman 492), he explains. This is true because being sent to prison takes away all aspects of living and being free in society. Their homes, families, friends and everything they’re used too is being…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death penalty is used universally, in developed countries, as well as, in undeveloped countries. The death penalty is used more for retribution and retaliation than it is for justice. The death penalty does not deter crime effectively, it is incompatible with human rights and human dignity, used against minorities and the poor, and there is always the risk of executing innocent people. Its easy to agree to the death penalty when the accused is not someone you know...bu what if the accused was your son, daughter, father, mother, brother, or sister? Would you still be for the death penalty?…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays