Preview

Evil Vs Religion

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
686 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Evil Vs Religion
The presence of evil and grief be situated the furthermost earnest complication in the creation, Also the single serious contest to conviction in the reality of an ethical God. Difficult of evil is difficult of reunion the realism of the evil in the creation with the realism of an all-powerful, all-knowing, and an impeccably virtuous God. The presence of immoral is definite by the inconsistency of the following theistic opinions: First, God is omnipotent means with certainly not any boundaries to what an omnipotent creature can do. Second, God is exclusively good defines as a creature is opposite to evil in a manner that it rejects evil as remote as it can. Third, Evil subsists symbolizes any faultiness in the creation. Fourth, God subsists …show more content…
No. Trusting in Divine Being merely means trusting in a superior governor. Thru all religious principle that substantiates an idea of God; single faith is endless that God is the inventor of the entire universe. A theist trusts that God subsists, who build and rules whole creation, but on the other hand, the atheist distrusts even the being such as God. They reason problem is everlasting; in addition they say anything theist title creation is the outcome of usual acts. I oppose the atheistic perception and endorse all theistic approaches. God holds the ability of bringing matters into presence, approaching belief as of this concept, then atheists might comprehend that having faith in God doesn’t entirely revolve around collecting substantial realities, rather reflecting on the impression God has on …show more content…
He establishes that the illogicality is a rational difficult and develops a realism solitary on behalf of theists who have faith in God to be present as omnipotent and also merely good. The atheists question if Deity is well-informed; He appears to be familiar with every awful things happening in the creation, If Deity is all-powerful then He may possibly be competent to get rid of all the grief, Moreover, if Deity is ethically flawless then definitely Deity would desire to get rid of it. First evil is not a thing, it’s a wrong choice. I believe that evil subsists because of the wrong choices we (people) make not because God makes us do it. Since, God have given us the free will, we can choose the right way but sometimes people tend to choose the wrong way. The wrong that we do results suffer, and the suffer we feel because of our wrong choices is evil. Most of the immoral in the universe happens simply for the reason that people desire to generate it. Mackie states that, “God could have made human beings in such a way that they always freely choose the good.” If so, God may perhaps generated automatons lacking of the gift to make choosing of their personal choices. Nevertheless a universe with independence is evidently more appreciated than a universe of automatons. I believe God is all-powerful, all-knowing, and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    J.L. Mackie’s, “Evil and Omnipotence,” criticizes the debate for the existence of God by arguing that the fundamentals of what a “perfect God” is are inconsistent with one another. The main theological doctrines of what a “perfect God” entails are as followed: God is omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omniscient. J.L. Mackie rejects this by stating God cannot be omnipotent and omnibenevolent if evil exists. He asserts that the problem of evil proves that either no god exists. Mackie soon reaches the debate question of, “Can a perfect God exist when suffering exists?”…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think that in reading the article we can relate to McCloskey in some of his concerns. One can question is the most relatable, the idea that God exist and so does evil. Personally, I have wondered why God would allow such troublesome times upon those who ultimately do not deserve to receive them. I think it is normal as a Christian to question faith in God from time to time. When my daughter was sick recently, I remember asking God a hundred times why? What did she do to deserve such things? However, it is important to note that while we may question God for his reasons as to why certain things may occur, we do not ultimately rule out the fact that he exist entirely. I think that McCloskey had a few of his ideas on the correct path, but he failed to recognize that the arguments presented were just the most basic outline to the question of God’s existence. The teleological and cosmological arguments should be used as starting points and not as the ending arguments to the question. God is not defined, but he is always present and powerful. One should realize that there is only so much knowledge available at hand, and we can only debate so far with what we know. I would argue to McCloskey that I find greater comfort in the knowledge that there is indeed a God, and we are not just the products of some uncontrolled chaos. I choose to believe that God regulates the…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The proposed solution to be discussed and Mackie’s response to it is the claim that ‘evil is due to human free will’ and as such it cannot be attributed to God. Evil should instead be attributed to the free actions of individuals, the power of which has been endowed upon them by God. While it is acknowledged that there exists evil in the world, as a result of some human free will, it is claimed that freedom of will is a more valuable good than any resultant evil. Through God allowing such freedom, He has satisfied His ‘wholly good’ requirement.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    P4: Evil is not due to God but to man’s misuse of the free will that God gave him (McCloskey & Hick, 332 &347).…

    • 1767 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It goes without question, that human beings will always question the existence of “God”. Whether these questions are formed in support or denial of an omnipresent creator they are important in helping shape our morality. H J McCloskey and his article “On Being and Atheist” is very critical of theists. It thus presents several arguments on how believers are incorrect in their belief in “God”, cosmological and teleological. McCloskey also focus’s on the existence of evil and how one can find comfort in atheism when facing evil.…

    • 1881 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In February of 1968, H. J. McCloskey’s published an article called, “On Being an Atheist.” In this, he argues that atheism is a more comfortable, logical and realistic than theism. He mentions the evil that is in the world and how it doesn’t make any sense to find comfort in a God that purposely causes pain, disease and natural disasters. McCloskey also mentions it is unreasonable to live by faith in this world. In this article, he argues the three theistic proofs including, the argument for design, the teleological argument and the cosmological argument.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The problem of evil is a significant and enduring philosophical and theological debate. A question is often raised and discussed: if God is both all-loving and all-powerful, then how can evils-including natural evil and moral evil---exist in our world? In response to the charge that the evils of the world are incompatible with God's omnipotence and perfect goodness, the word"theodicy" is coined to deal with the problem of evil. Usually it is an attempt to show that it is possible to affirm the omnipotence of God, the love of God, and the reality of evil without contradiction. Two of the most well-known and most frequently discussed theodicies are the Augustinian theodicy and the Irenaean theodicy.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The question of whether there is a God has been debated by many philosophers, religious experts, and even your average citizens. Many of those people have attempted to argue why God is or is not real. This paper is going to present two different arguments by the philosophers: Robin Collins and William Rowe. The first argument by Collins is an argument for the existence of God, who designed our incredibly complex universe. The explanation of Collin’s argument will be followed by Rowe’s argument against the existence of God, which is in relation to intense suffering that exists in this world. With those two arguments at hand, the question is, are the conclusions compatible?…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Response Paper

    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1968, a article was published by a man named H.J. McCloskey called “On Being an Atheist”, in which an attempt to present arguments against the existence of God is made. In his work, McCloskey attempts to provide readers with the argument that atheism is more “reasonable and comfortable (McCloskey,1968)” compared to the alternative theistic view. In his article, McCloskey attempts to make arguments against the three typical theistic proofs of God which includes the cosmological and teleological arguments, along with the argument from design. McCloskey uses the existence of evil and the irrationalness off faith against the theistic view of God. At the beginning of the article it seems that an intriguing argument will be made regarding the theistic view point of God, yet as McCloskey continues the argument becomes more biased in attacking spiritual beliefs which questions his validity.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In fact McCloskey places the bar even lower by referring to the “proofs of” rather than “arguments for” God’s existence, thereby overstating the Theist’s claim. With respect to the “proofs” for God’s existence that McCloskey attempts to deal with, namely the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments, McCloskey offers trivial objections that are easily answered. With respect to arguments for God’s non-existence, McCloskey offers the logical form of the problem of evil which, while rich in rhetoric, does not contain enough logic to necessitate its title. McCloskey ends his article with a pragmatic justification of Atheist, stating that Atheism is more comforting that Theism; a point that is stark in its irrelevance.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Religious notions of evil and moral notions of evil are not mutually exclusive. This paper defines religion, morality and evil, and explains how religion and morality are compatible and have similar characteristics. Despite the compatibility, they also have their differences but this does not make them mutually exclusive in my opinion. This paper also makes use of ‘Love and Law’ by Alison Gopnik to explain the commensurability between religious and moral notions of evil. Gopnik explains the mind of a child and how children are innately empathetic. She shows how morality is grounded by empathy and creative examples and scenarios.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Chapter 13 Essay

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As my second part of the final essay I chose the questions from chapter 13. I will discuss the following questions in this essay: Is it possible that what one feels about the problem of evil depends largely on one’s prior beliefs on the existence of God? Isn’t it likely that a theist will find a solution to the problem? Isn’t it likely that an atheist will see it as disproving God’s existence? What side of the fence are you on concerning the question of God’s existence, and what difference does it make in your own view of the problem of evil? First I want to quote Hume and the most famous way the problem of evil is stated: “Is he willing to prevent evil,…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    He proposes four fallacious solutions to discredit the belief that God is all powerful and/or all good. Mackie’s first solution is “Good cannot exist without evil” or “Evil is a necessary counterpart to good” (Feinberg & Shaffer-Landau, 2013, p. 102). He compares good and evil to great and small, stating maybe humans need the opposites to measure actions as good or evil. He then talks of evil as a compliment to good, using the color red to explain that God could have made everything good, but we would not have noticed if all things were red or good. That is to say that “evil exists, but only enough to serve as the counterpart to good” (Feinberg & Shaffer-Landau, 2013, p. 102). His second possible solution is “Evil is necessary as a means to good” (p. 102).His question then is if God is bound by such common laws or such logic necessities, is He all-powerful? Third “the universe is better with some evil in it than it could be if there were no evil” (p.102). Mackie discusses the possibility of good overpowering evil being better than unchallenged good. He presents evil as pain and he calls misery and pain the first order of evil and pleasure and happiness the first order of good. Mackie then describes a second order of good that comes from the first order of evil which is supposed to make good from the first level of evil, but that just proves that there is evil, so God’s goodness is like a third level good that maximizes…

    • 1612 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The central concept of the film Narnia is all about sacrifice and the beliefs that Jesus bestowed upon many during his lifetime. The act of sacrifice is a gift to God to ask him to forgive sins; or to thank him for something. Jesus gave himself to die as a sacrifice for our sins. In the film Aslan (portrayal of Jesus) sacrifice’s his life to the white witch to relieve Edmund (son of Adam) of his sins.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Does God Allow Evil?

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Many people dispute the true intentions of God, himself, since the beginning of mankind. Opposing and concurring arguments can be just as primitive. Regardless of personal perspective on any indefinite theory, it is undeniable that the controversy between good and evil will inevitably exist. Two dominant philosophers discussed in “The Problem of Evil” are Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and David Hume. Both of these authors discuss interesting motives from both sides of the issue: why and why not God should allow evil.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays