Man obviously shares a common ancestry with the modern apes, such as the gorilla and chimpanzee. We know this from the many characteristics that are shared between apes and man. Apart from obvious anatomical and behavioral similarities, the two groups also have many blood proteins and other biochemical characteristics in common.
A comparison of the skulls of a gorilla and a modern man illustrate the main trends that have taken place in human evolution from an ape-like ancestry. But apart from the skull, there have been major changes in the hipbones of man during evolution, associated with the change from walking on four legs to walking on two. The modern apes and modern man must have had a common ancestry. The earliest apes probably arose in the Oligocene period, and by 25 million years ago had given rise to a large number of forms. Proconsul primitive ape from this period shows some resemblance to Old World monkeys as well as to modern apes.
There is considerable controversy over the progress of human evolution, and particularly over when the split took place between the line leading to modern apes and to modern man.
SPECIES TIME PERIOD
Australopithecus afarensis 4 to 2.7 million years ago
Australopithecus africanus 3 to 2 million years ago
Australopithecus robustus 2.2 to 1.6 million years ago
Homo habilis 2.2 to 1.6 million years ago
Homo erectus 2.0 to 0.4 million years ago
Neanderthal 200 to 35 thousand years ago
Cro-magnon 35 thousand years ago
Homo sapien 200 thousand years ago to present
PRIMATES
The modern man is spread all over the world. Our closest relatives, the apes, the monkeys, and the lemurs, only live in tropical or subtropical areas.
Today there are 153 different species of primates in the world. They are divided into five main groups:
· Man; 1 genus, 1 species
· Apes; 4 genera, 11 species
· Old World monkeys; 14 genera, 72 species
· New World monkeys; 16 genera, 33 species
· Prosimians; 20 genera, 36 species
The primates evolved from insectivores at the beginning of the Tertiary, about 65 million years ago. In the Eocene there were many different lemurs. The new world monkeys were isolated in South- and Middle America early in the Tertiary, and still live only on that continent. The old world monkeys became numerous and common only towards the end of the Tertiary and in the Quaternary. The apes had their richest evolution in the Miocene. Today they are rare.
All six main groups of primates that evolved during the Tertiary and Quaternary have living members. Therefore, studies of living species tell us a lot about the evolutionary history of the primates.
FOSSIL APES
The oldest apes are known from the Oligocene. They are about 30 million years old, and are found in Africa. During the Miocene, several types of apes developed. Eventually they spread to Europe and Asia. Towards the end of the Miocene, the diversity was at its largest. It was probably at this time, in the African apes, that the evolution of the human family began.
The apes have always been tree living and associated with forests. At the beginning of the Pliocene, climatic changes led to the disappearance of large forested areas. Many forms of apes went extinct during this period.
Today there are only four genera of apes left. They live in small areas; gorilla and chimpanzee in Central-Africa, gibbon and orangutan in South East Asia.
The apes walk on all four legs, and their arms are longer than their legs. They have both a grasping hand and foot, and lack a tail. The jaws have a characteristic square shape, and the canines are larger than other teeth. An important common trait for all apes is their relatively large brain. Among the apes, the males are usually larger than the females. They are commonly social animals, and live in family groups of varying size.
Hominids
The human family is defined as Hominids. Hominids are characterized by several features, such as their manner of movement (locomotion). We have an upright position, a large reorganized brain, along with a diminished face and teeth. Use and construction of tools are notable characteristics of Hominids. The evolutionary design of man has always intrigued Anthropologists. Climatic changes may have been responsible for the development of the characteristics of Hominids. These climatic changes began 24 million years ago.
Australopithecus Afarensis
Australopithecus afarensis was small and slender, between 1.1 and 1.4 metres tall. Proportionately, it had somewhat longer arms than the other hominids. The brain was only about 420 cm3, and the teeth indicate that it ate mostly plants. In 1974, an almost complete skeleton of an adult of Australopithecus afarensis was found in Hadar in Ethiopia. This fossil has become known as "Lucy" and is about three million years old.
Australopithecus africanus
The main differences between the afarenis and africanus were height and brain capacity.
Australopithecus robustus
Australopithecus robustus had an average height of 1.5 m. Scientists note that robustus had a flat face. Their skull is very 'ape-like' in that it has a small brain and massive jaws, but it also shows several hominid characteristics in the dentition. Pelvic girdles of australopithecenes have also been found, which are similar to those of a man, (rather than that of a chimpanzee) and indicate the animals walked on two legs
Homo Erectus
The oldest findings of Homo erectus are known from east Africa, and are about 1.8 million years old. During the next 1.5 million years, H. erectus spread to north Africa, Europe and Asia. The size of the brain increased markedly from the earliest to the last members of this species. The volume of the brain varied from 800 to 1200 cm3, but the hemispherical brain was proportionally smaller than in modern humans.
A study of the Peking man, and other fossils of this species, has shown that Homo erectus was similar to modern man in a great many ways. The limbs of Homo erectus are extremely like those of modern man, and we know these animals used fire and made stone tools. Culturally, Homo erectus may have been almost as advanced as some of the less civilised races of modern man. Because of this continuum of characteristics with one extreme nearing the shape and size of Homo sapiens, it is thought that Homo erectus is a direct descendent of modern man, and not a separate and extinct line.
Neanderthal
Before and during the last ice age there appeared a very distinctive type of man, the Neanderthal. Although they appeared later than the Homo erectus and had larger brains, they showed a number of features that were more ape-like.
The brow ridges were relatively large, with only a slight forehead, and the upper jaw was large while the lower jaw receded. There are also areas on the skull for the attachment of large jaw and neck muscles. The vertebrate joined the skull in a position to the rear of the skull, suggesting that the head had a forehead tilt.
Originally it was thought that the Neanderthals were direct ancestors of man. But skeletal remains of modern man have now been found dating from the same time as the Neanderthals, suggesting that they both arose from a common ancestor. It is now thought that the Neanderthal was a close subspecies of modern man, which became extinct some 40000 years ago.
Cro-Magnon
Cro-Magnon lived from 40,000 years ago to 10,000 years ago. Cro-Magnon lived in Africa and traveled to Europe, Asia, and Australia. Later they also lived in North and South America. Their fossils were found in the same places they lived. Cro Magnon looked like modern humans. They were tall like modern humans with no brow ridges, a thinner and more rounded skull, a higher forehead, and a slightly projecting chin. The average brain size was about 1,350 milliliters. Their bodies were like a modern human. For breakfast they caught fish. For lunch they ate mammoth, ducks and other birds, and for dinner they ate plants, nuts, shellfish, fruits, and berries. They caught , picked, and hunted for their food. They tied antler points with the barbs pointing backwards to wound animals.
Homo Sapien
Towards the end of the last ice age the Neanderthals of Europe were abruptly displaced by modern man Homo sapiens sapiens who had developed somewhere in Africa and had then migrated into Europe.
These early men were mainly hunters, and had developed quite sophisticated tools and weapons, and could use symbols and had a true language. Physically they were identical to modern man, but their better social organisation may have enabled them to displace the Neanderthals.
The early forms of Homo sapiens have left behind large quantities of artefacts, from which it is possible to trace the early development of tool making.
Primitive hand-axes developed out of the same technique as was used for the Olduvai pebble tools: a stone or flint nodule was hit with another stone and a series of chips broken away to leave large, deep flake scars and mould the tool into the form of a pear-shaped axe.
More accurate tools were made later by pressure-flaking, in which a sharper cutting blade was created by breaking away small chips of bone from the edge. Late stone tools were often beautifully made, as fine arrow points, harpoons and blades.
One thing is clear. We are what evolution made us. We are all the result of adaptation and mutation. Yet while we arrogantly pride ourselves on how far we have come since we first began our evolutionary trek, how far have we really come? Even with all our modern machines, we are, essentially, still wrapped in loincloths--warring, hunting, mating. It might be argued that because of evolution, and natural selection, we are the result of the survival of the fittest. Our ancestors who best adapted to their surroundings, and who reproduced most successfully, spawned others who had to exhibit equal cunning and virility to pass on their genes. Some feel that in the not-too-distant past we were our strongest, most intelligent and most virile. Now that we have labor saving devices, machines do much of our thinking for us.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Jared Diamond discusses how the ancestors of humans began to develop many years ago. Human ancestors began walking straight up around 4 million years ago. Archaeologists called this period of new technology and inventions the Great Leap Forward. After the Great Leap Forward, the human race started to expand its territory. Many humans stayed in Africa and Eurasia for many years.…
- 1366 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The next closest to humans and chimps are horses, because on the chart there are 3 differences and the rest are similar…
- 339 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Name _________________________________________ Date _________________ Anthropology 301 Self-Paced Lab 1: Introduction to the Primates 1. Which of these items or features might be studied by a physical anthropologist? a. A ceramic pot from an early civilization.…
- 374 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The issue of the status of Neanderthal man has been hotly contested in the anthropology world. It is the matter of whether Homo Sapiens are the decedents of Neanderthals or whether they are cousins with a common ancestor. If Neanderthals are considered to be a proper descendent to Homo Sapiens, then they can be rightfully classified as Homo Sapiens Neanderthal. If they are truly a separate species, then they should be classified as Homo Neanderthal.…
- 534 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
* Hominins: Modern humans and all extinct species more closely related to humans than chimps and bonobos…
- 679 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The theory of evolution holds, not necessarily that man somehow descended from any kind of ape or monkey, but rather that probably he and they have arrived from a common ancestry.…
- 1142 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The movie summary I am going to talk about is the Survey of Primates film we watched in class. The film describes the basic characteristics of primates, illustrates the geographic locations and regions of their various primate forms. The movie also describes the various adaptations in which primates had evolved from in based on their location in the world, and also briefly describes types of behavioral and the social adaptions on primates' relation towards humans. The film starts off by stating that the subspecies of primates are apes, monkeys, and prosimians and are all closely related to humans. Primates usually are located in the tropics and semi-tropics of the world.…
- 279 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Monkeys are divided into two main groups new world and old world monkeys. Old world monkeys live in Africa and Asia. New world monkeys like capuchins and howler monkeys live in Central and South America. These monkeys are very slow moving creatures. They like to stay on top of tree tops and barely ever come down.…
- 901 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Apes are divided into two main groups of hominoids: lesser apes and hylobatids and great apes (humans divided from the…
- 86 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Many processes have taken place to shape humans from the Australopithecus Afarensis to the modern day human also known as the Homo Sapien. As a result, the two defining traits that occurred by taxonomy are the effects of brain size and bipedalism. Humans, like other primates are considered as Order Primates in the Hominidae family and therefore are a prime example of taxonomy when the two diverged into different species. During taxonomy when humans diverged from their ancestors 6 to 7 million years ago, the result is the differences such as walking upright, brain size and overall skeletal structure are prominent due to the divergence of humans and other primates. Although primates and humans both share many anatomical, behavioral and socialization traits the differences are drastic and are all a result of selective pressures.…
- 1146 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Primates are a group of mammals that have special characteristics that include: both eyes are located at the front of the head and they provide binocular or three-dimensional vision; also all primates have 5 fingers (four fingers and a thumb).…
- 899 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
There are two theories about the origin of modern humans; the out of Africa view argues that genes in the fully modern human all came out of Africa and there was no interbreeding involved and the alternative model; a multi-regional view that argues how all human population flowed between different regions and mixed together which contributed to the development of the modern human. What makes these theories the most highly debateable in paleoanthropology is that 30,000 years ago, the taxonomic diversity previously seen amongst homo sapiens, homo erectus and homo Neanderthals had vanished and humans everywhere had evolved into the anatomically and behaviourally modern form; there is much deliberation as to how this occurred which rose this differing schools of thought; one that emphasises multiregional continuity and the other that suggests a single origin for modern humans. In order to understand this controversy, the archaeological, anatomical and genetic evidence needs to be evaluated.…
- 1672 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Major Trends in Hominin Evolution are diet, cultural evolution, encephalization, language and speech Diet; In addition to forcing changes in locomotion that led to walking upright, the increasingly dry climate of east Africa over the last six million years forced changes in the diet of early hominins from the soft fruits of the tropical rain forest to the increasingly fibrous and tough foods available in open habitats.Early hominin diets are reconstructed partly based on the surface areas of the molars and the cross-sectional area of the body of the lower jaw (Collard…
- 3142 Words
- 13 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Since humans and other primates share a variety of characteristics, other primates provide important observations about early humans. Homologies between hominids and other primates enhance to behavior because the physiological and cognitive formations that manage to control human demeanor are likely related to those of other primates than to members of other taxonomic groups. The reality of this broad collection of homologous traits, the commodity of the average evolutionary history of the primates, means that nonhuman primates give beneficial examples for understanding the evolutionary ancestry of hominid morphology and for resolving the basis of human nature.…
- 607 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
I thought that this question was very interesting because primates are the closest living relatives to humans. Primates are fascinating because they resemble a primitive or basal version of ourselves and at the same time are also quite different from us as well. There is a large number of primate species both in the African and Asian continents as well as in the Americas. Those species that are found in Africa and Asia are collectively called old world monkeys and apes. The species found in the Americas are known as new world monkeys. An interesting feature that many of the new world monkeys have that old world monkeys do not is a prehensile tail which can be used as a fifth limb. Another interesting difference is that thanks in part to their prehensile tails the new world monkeys are almost entirely arboreal while the old world monkeys are both terrestrial and arboreal.…
- 540 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays