In regards to our case no. 210204 Justin King v. Anheuser Busch Companies, Inc. I find Contributory Negligence to be the appropriate Affirmative Defensive action. Mr. King exacerbated his injury when he took it upon himself to loosen the wires, to his own admittance. Justin King was also swerving and/or switching lanes frequently perhaps not paying attention or distracted by his recent Music Record deal signing with MCI Records. I chose to say contributory negligence because we cannot deny that cases of beer were not properly secured in our vehicle, proving that it was some percentage of our own default.…
Plaintiffs argues recovery under the “reasonably Foreseeability” test, which would allow a Plaintiff outside the “Zone of Danger” to recover, which was adopted in Sinn v. Burd, 486 Pa. 146 (1979). The Court stated in response that the Plaintiff’s flexible interpretation of the “jurisprudential concept …which require[s] that the defendant’s breach of a duty of care proximately causes plaintiff’s injury,” was flawed. Moreover, that “at some point along the causal chain, the passage of time and the span of distance mandate a cut-off point for liability.” Id.…
Mary is cutting weeds at her home. She is unable to trim some weeds she finds, because they grew between the rocks, so she removes the protective guard on the weed trimmer and trims the weeds. There are no warnings on the weed trimmer advising against removing the guard. She hits a rock, which is thrown to the side, hitting her neighbor in the eye and causing permanent damage. What kind of tort claim does the neighbor have? Who are the possible defendants?…
Under the traditional choice-of-law rule of lex loci delicti (The law of the place where a wrong was committed.), what conduct constitutes contributory negligence is a question of substantive law which is governed by the law of the state where the injury occurred. Thus, whether contributory negligence of the plaintiff precludes recovery in whole or in part in a negligence action is to be settled by the law of the place of the wrong. A comparative negligence statute likewise is part of the substantive law of the state, and therefore, the effect of the plaintiff's comparative negligence also will be determined by the law of the jurisdiction in which the wrong occurred.…
The first element that a plaintiff must prove is that the defendant owed him or her legal duty of care. Generally, this duty of care is a legal notion that states that people owe anyone around them or anyone who could be around them a duty to not place them in situations of undue risk of harm. Proving this element will largely depend on the facts of the situation. After the plaintiff has proved that a legal duty of care existed, he or she must then prove that this duty was breached. Generally, courts will use the standard of a ‘reasonable person’ when it comes to this question. Specifically, this means that the judge or jury must view the facts of the situation and decide what a reasonable person would have done in a similar situation. If this reasonable person would have acted differently than the defendant, it’s likely that it will be found that the duty was breached. Causation is the most complicated element of negligence. It means that the plaintiff must prove that the defendant either directly or indirectly caused the injuries and damages suffered by the plaintiff because of the breach of the duty of care. This element has confused even the most respected legal minds over time, and its proof should not be taken lightly. Last, a plaintiff in a negligence case must prove a legally recognized harm, usually in the form of physical injury to a person or to property. It is not enough that the defendant failed to exercise reasonable care. The failure to exercise reasonable care must result in actual damages to a person to whom the defendant owed a duty of care (FindLaw 2012). These damages can be actual costs such as medical expenses and lost income or intangible costs such as pain and suffering or loss of companionship.…
Negligence consists of four different elements: duty, breach, causation, and damages. In order to collect damages for the harm done the claimant must prove several things: the duty of care one owes to another, the standard of care expected by one from another, breach of the duty of care, and damage(s) either physical, emotional or monetary. In…
One very important issue in this case and many civil lawsuits is negligence. Negligence is when there is a failure to use reasonable care which results in injury or damage to another. It also asks who is responsible for one’s injury. In this case, Mrs. McKoy claims her injuries were caused by T & J’s negligent behavior. In order to prove negligence, T & J must be guilty of five elements: duty of due care, breach, factual cause, proximate cause, and damages.…
Negligence law states that a person or an organization is generally liable when they negligently injure others.…
Legal Causation: Having been part of negligent activity, however not legally responsible under the law…
1. Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and assume the risk of particular accident?…
Birth injuries to a child or the mother can happen through no one's fault, but there are situations where an injury could have been prevented. Through negligence on the part of a doctor or hospital staff, a child is harmed. This injury can have an impact throughout the child's life. A parent may be entitled to compensation for the increased medical and child care expenses due to this injury. The following are three situations when you should contact a personal injury attorney for consultation.…
The final element needed to establish negligence requires that there be a close, reasonable, and casual relationship between the defendant’s negligent conduct and the resulting damages suffered by the plaintiff – in other words…
The most essential thing in life is a plan. Construction workers have blueprints that are plans to shelter thousands of unaware people. Teachers that plan to be successful during the school year plan out each concept to effectively teach their students. In order for me to be successful in life, I have to plan my future as a college student to a worker in whatever the career of my choosing. I want to be involved in business and computer technology industry. Throughout my life, my dad, a database administrator, kept me around computers all my life and I learned naturally through many business ventures as an adolescent that business was also something I enjoyed. The computer industry will exponentially increase as the development of new and improved technology continues to make the lives of Americans easier and more efficient. Georgia State offers a great computer science program that I hope will help me get my first foot into my career as a database developer.…
Every Barangay in our town have their own problem. Our problem in our Barangay in the trash in the rivers so I design a Trash trap To trap the trash in the watershed’s. Trash is becoming a larger and larger problem for us and for the environment. As we continue to waste more and more, we use more natural resources and increase pollution in our world.…
Advertisements play a vital role today in promoting the sale of consumer goods. Traditionally advertisements are made through hand bills, exhibitions, magazines, radio, etc. Newspapers occupy a major role in advertisement field which carry the message to every nook and corner of the world.…