Examples Of Just Consequentialism

When looking at ethical frameworks there are two that stand out, consequentialism and just consequentialism. These two frameworks focus on policies and values, such as duty, justice, and the pursuit of the greatest happiness for the majority, that people already understand and focus on when making decisions. This intrinsic core makes them easy to understand and a valuable part of our ethical decision making. Consequentialism and just consequentialism use a similar utilitarian approach to their ethical decision making. Their utilitarian approach focusses mainly on the good of the majority. Just consequentialism adds a two-step decision-making process onto the utilitarian body of consequentialism. This extra process allows for the consideration of one’s duties and rights when making ethical decisions, making just consequentialism better for the majority as well as individuals.
Consequentialism-based ethics focuses on the promotion
Just consequentialism claims that our morals should focus on our rights and duties to others, meaning we justifiable have the right to expect others to fulfill their duties towards us, for example, we expect others not to steal from us and we expect the software we buy to be as bug-free as possible. Like consequentialism, just consequentialism is used when needing to decide between the lesser of two evils. Just consequentialism uses two stages to help us decide what is just, the deliberation stage, and the selection stage. The deliberation stage is used to consider all possible policies from an impartial point of view. This policy consideration is needed to make sure none of the policies cause unnecessary harm to the individuals or groups . After deliberation, the selection stage is used to weigh the good consequences and the bad consequences from the policies selected from the previous