Preview

Why Is Adultery Wrong

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
220 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Adultery Wrong
Another problem with consequentialism is that the theory maintains that wrongness and rightness are not found in the action itself, but in the ramifications of it. The absurdity of this claim can be best seen with an example; adultery isn’t wrong in itself, but it is wrong when harmful effects are the result. More specifically, adultery is wrong if it causes the spouse harm, but morally correct if the result is a stronger marriage and a deeper connection. Calling adultery moral reveals the folly of consequentialism, and yet another reason why the moral rightness of an action cannot be determined by its corresponding consequences. Consequences simply cannot determine the moral quality of an action due to the excessive demands associated with

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Acct3563 Individual Report

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Consequentialism conveys that the rightness and wrongness of an action depend entirely on its consequence and outcome. Stakeholders that may be vulnerable to our company’s income smoothing practices include:…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A consequentialist theory which one decides an ethical decision should maximize benefits to society and minimize harms.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Consequentialists believe that whether an act is right or wrong depends only on the overall consequence of that act, where punishment should serve to promote good, contributing to crime prevention or societal welfare.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The difference between these three approaches to morality tends to lie more in the way moral dilemmas are approached than in the moral conclusions reached. The perfect example would be people argue that lying is wrong because of the negative consequence produced by lying. However, consequentialists may allow that certain foreseeable consequences might make lying acceptable.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In this chapter of Briggle and Mitchams Ethics and Science they touch upon the idea of consequentialism and the idea that everyone has their own morals or beliefs. Consequentialism can sometimes be seen as over the top and judgmental while someones moral beliefs are a lighter approach to the situation. The belief that everyone has their own moral compass whether directed by family, religion, or just by the societal idea of being good and following the crowd.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Act consequentialism is a form of consequentialism that influences peoples’ decisions by ranking consequences of an act from best to worst, ultimately cultivating the moral rightness of one's decision. An act consequentialist would apply policy 1, as their focus is narrowed on the (alleged) set of consequences: a reduction…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    understands the wrongness of an action depends more on the intention that the consequence of the…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Is Cheating Wrong

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page

    There are people in this world that think cheating is acceptable if you are cheating for the right reasons or for the greater good. They are wrong. Cheating is never acceptable.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Act consequentialism supports the idea that actions are made right or wrong based solely on their consequences. This means that a person would look to the consequences of a certain action to determine whether or not that action is right or wrong. A ‘right’ action would be one that leads to the best results where as a ‘wrong’ action would be one with less than ideal consequences. According to this basic theory, one would always choose the ‘right’ action because it leads to the most favorable consequences. Though this theory can sound appealing, I do not agree fully that actions are determined solely based on consequences. I think that everyone has their own set of moral ethics or values and these can affect whether or not a person sees a particular action as ‘right’ or ‘wrong’. One definition of…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethics in Criminal Justice

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Actions and inactions all have moral implications; they are either right or wrong depending on the individual and what s/he believes or feels is right or wrong. Each person’s conduct can and does have implications and ramifications. For every action there is an equal and/or opposite reaction not only for the average person but also for professionals; especially in the area of law enforcement, criminal justice, and criminal procedure. Just discussed is known as moral philosophy.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Even though Deontology and Consequentialism can be extremely similar, both contain key factors that make each idea unique and very different. Sometimes, it may appear that both these theories simply arrive at the same conclusion by way of different paths. While this is sometimes true, it is important to understand how these theories differ. Each of these braches of Ethics deals with morals, actions, ethical decisions and judgments. Beyond the surface though, each of these Ethical ideas begin to differ greatly. Deontology is the theory and/or idea that judges the morality of an action based on the action’s adherence to the overall rules. Consequentialism is the theory and/or idea that the morality should be judged on the action’s overall outcome or consequences. Both theories judge morality. However, Deontology judges morality based on the actions themselves, while Consequentialism judges morality based on the end reaction. Out of these two ethical theories I believe Consequentialism to be least likely to be false.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    consequentialist theories are the need to have determined consequences for all actions and there is no consistent method of resolving conflicts of self-interest. As for Nonconsequentialist theories, in my opinion as to most religions, someone interpreted the material, how can we actually determine the existence of a supernatural…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adultery Hurts

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages

    No one commits adultery without first being able to justify their behaviour to themselves. The problem with such justifications is they are falsehoods, a way of engaging in bad behaviour without having to think about the consequences of the adultery to self and others.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Consequentialist theory is if the consequences are good, the action is right, if they are bad, the action is wrong and it base on the outcome of the action it is maximise happiness and minimise pain and it will depend of the consequences of the action it will get the greatest number even if the action is immoral but it can get a greatest number of happiness.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays