Consequentialism conveys that the rightness and wrongness of an action depend entirely on its consequence and outcome. Stakeholders that may be vulnerable to our company’s income smoothing practices include:…
A consequentialist theory which one decides an ethical decision should maximize benefits to society and minimize harms.…
Consequentialists believe that whether an act is right or wrong depends only on the overall consequence of that act, where punishment should serve to promote good, contributing to crime prevention or societal welfare.…
The difference between these three approaches to morality tends to lie more in the way moral dilemmas are approached than in the moral conclusions reached. The perfect example would be people argue that lying is wrong because of the negative consequence produced by lying. However, consequentialists may allow that certain foreseeable consequences might make lying acceptable.…
In this chapter of Briggle and Mitchams Ethics and Science they touch upon the idea of consequentialism and the idea that everyone has their own morals or beliefs. Consequentialism can sometimes be seen as over the top and judgmental while someones moral beliefs are a lighter approach to the situation. The belief that everyone has their own moral compass whether directed by family, religion, or just by the societal idea of being good and following the crowd.…
Utilitarianism theories hold that the moral worth of actions or practices is determined by their consequences. An action or practice is right if it leads to the best possible balance of good consequences over bad consequences for all affected parties. (Arnold, pp 17)…
Act consequentialism is a form of consequentialism that influences peoples’ decisions by ranking consequences of an act from best to worst, ultimately cultivating the moral rightness of one's decision. An act consequentialist would apply policy 1, as their focus is narrowed on the (alleged) set of consequences: a reduction…
understands the wrongness of an action depends more on the intention that the consequence of the…
There are people in this world that think cheating is acceptable if you are cheating for the right reasons or for the greater good. They are wrong. Cheating is never acceptable.…
Act consequentialism supports the idea that actions are made right or wrong based solely on their consequences. This means that a person would look to the consequences of a certain action to determine whether or not that action is right or wrong. A ‘right’ action would be one that leads to the best results where as a ‘wrong’ action would be one with less than ideal consequences. According to this basic theory, one would always choose the ‘right’ action because it leads to the most favorable consequences. Though this theory can sound appealing, I do not agree fully that actions are determined solely based on consequences. I think that everyone has their own set of moral ethics or values and these can affect whether or not a person sees a particular action as ‘right’ or ‘wrong’. One definition of…
Actions and inactions all have moral implications; they are either right or wrong depending on the individual and what s/he believes or feels is right or wrong. Each person’s conduct can and does have implications and ramifications. For every action there is an equal and/or opposite reaction not only for the average person but also for professionals; especially in the area of law enforcement, criminal justice, and criminal procedure. Just discussed is known as moral philosophy.…
Even though Deontology and Consequentialism can be extremely similar, both contain key factors that make each idea unique and very different. Sometimes, it may appear that both these theories simply arrive at the same conclusion by way of different paths. While this is sometimes true, it is important to understand how these theories differ. Each of these braches of Ethics deals with morals, actions, ethical decisions and judgments. Beyond the surface though, each of these Ethical ideas begin to differ greatly. Deontology is the theory and/or idea that judges the morality of an action based on the action’s adherence to the overall rules. Consequentialism is the theory and/or idea that the morality should be judged on the action’s overall outcome or consequences. Both theories judge morality. However, Deontology judges morality based on the actions themselves, while Consequentialism judges morality based on the end reaction. Out of these two ethical theories I believe Consequentialism to be least likely to be false.…
consequentialist theories are the need to have determined consequences for all actions and there is no consistent method of resolving conflicts of self-interest. As for Nonconsequentialist theories, in my opinion as to most religions, someone interpreted the material, how can we actually determine the existence of a supernatural…
No one commits adultery without first being able to justify their behaviour to themselves. The problem with such justifications is they are falsehoods, a way of engaging in bad behaviour without having to think about the consequences of the adultery to self and others.…
A Consequentialist theory is if the consequences are good, the action is right, if they are bad, the action is wrong and it base on the outcome of the action it is maximise happiness and minimise pain and it will depend of the consequences of the action it will get the greatest number even if the action is immoral but it can get a greatest number of happiness.…