Some people believe Iowa and New Hampshire have too much influence because their primary elections are always first, therefore shaping the rest of the election. USAToday’s “Why Should Iowa and N.H. Always Go First?” suggests a rotating, regional primary system that would allow this influential vote to occur somewhere else for every election. Other people suggest getting rid of the primary process completely because they believe it isn’t democratic, and others think there should be a new way of running the primary elections. According to “The Best Way to Fix Our Presidential Primary System” people suggest using a National Primary where all primary/ caucus elections would happen on one day, shortening the amount of time that primaries span over, or separating the country in to different regions and holding primary elections on specific dates in those
Some people believe Iowa and New Hampshire have too much influence because their primary elections are always first, therefore shaping the rest of the election. USAToday’s “Why Should Iowa and N.H. Always Go First?” suggests a rotating, regional primary system that would allow this influential vote to occur somewhere else for every election. Other people suggest getting rid of the primary process completely because they believe it isn’t democratic, and others think there should be a new way of running the primary elections. According to “The Best Way to Fix Our Presidential Primary System” people suggest using a National Primary where all primary/ caucus elections would happen on one day, shortening the amount of time that primaries span over, or separating the country in to different regions and holding primary elections on specific dates in those