Preview

Exclusion Argument For Physicalism

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
502 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Exclusion Argument For Physicalism
In this paper I will be stating the Exclusion Argument for Physicalism. I will be stating each premise and providing an example to further my point. Furthermore, I will be evaluating the Exclusion argument and giving my own stance. Whether I advocate for Hard Determinism or Compatibilism and how does free will go into play.
The causal closure of physics is notably known as an argument against Dualism. The first premise, downward causation occurs when a mental event causes a physical event in the body. Secondly, causal closure when every event has a physical cause; no physical event has a nonphysical cause. Lastly, exclusion in which an event is caused by a sequence of physical events, at most one event. Due to casual closure and exclusion, any event that causes a physical event therefore, has to be physical. To elaborate, if a mental event causes a physical event that event is itself physical. Downward causation states that mental events causes physical events, therefore dualism is false. Lastly, if all mental events are composed of similar aspects, therefore
…show more content…
That person got up to get a sandwich because they were hungry. Their thought about being hungry is an example of physical event. Their hunger is partly being controlled by the hypothalamus in the brain. Blood sugar levels, and other hormones are signaling to the brain that the body is hungry. Therefore, since the brain is signaling hunger to the person they eventually get up to feed themselves. This demonstrates the notation that a mental event is actually a physical event. The supposed mental event of hunger can be explained physically, therefore it is a physical event. The physical neurological and anatomical processes within the brain and body is causing the sense of hunger. Therefore, resulting the person getting up to go eat. The supposed mental event is truly representative of a physical event causing another physical

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    PSYCH 1101 Ch. 11

    • 3038 Words
    • 13 Pages

    A) Use the defense mechanism of denial to thwart the hunger pangs until an appropriate meal can be obtained.…

    • 3038 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Mental Causation,” Karen Bennett discusses the overdetermination argument associated with the exclusion problem. Even if one assumes that causal power can be attributed to the mental, it is unclear that mental causation contributes anything meaningful to the explanation of an effect and does not merely overdetermine it, since the effect could be given a purely physical explanation (Kim 325). Some philosophers have bitten the bullet and claimed that mental causation is, in fact, comparable to the classic overdetermination example of a firing squad shooting a victim. Just as the death of the victim was overdetermined given the multiple bullets (each being a sufficient cause), bodily motions are determined to occur by a physical and a mental…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Psyc 4100

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Rychlak, J. F. (1998). Is there an unrecognized teleology in Hume 's analysis of causation?. Journal Of Theoretical And Philosophical Psychology, 18(1), 52-60.…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The philosopher Roderick Chisholm (1916-1999) used many of arguments to explain how his trusted of determinism was untruthful as well as in what way it is conflicting with freedom. Determinism is everything that happens has a cause or causes that determined it to happen. On the other hand, freedom is significantly more subjective and conveys set of concepts all through metaphysics. Metaphysics is the study of the nature of reality. Throughout the paper, I will clarify freedom as described by Roderick Chisholm and compatibilism as described by Harry Frankfurt and argue that compatibilism is conceivable and obvious theory from Frankfurt’s arguments.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I believe Jackson’s ‘Knowledge Argument’ is a successful objection to ‘Physicalism’ (the doctrine that the entire world is physical), consequently proving it is false. I am of this view because the argument is successful in establishing the claim: ‘There are truths about consciousness that cannot be deduced from the complete physical truth’. In my view the ‘Knowledge Argument’ as it stands, is without an objection that entails its falsity, as Jackson and other supporters of the argument have been successful in there endeavors to defend the argument against its numerous objections. This paper will briefly discuss how the ‘Knowledge Argument’ (in its most simplistic form) successfully articulates its objection against ‘Physicalism’. The more…

    • 2346 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    When thinking about certain correlations between our physical body and the mind, for instance c fibres firing and pain, one might come to the conclusion that despite having thorough scientific knowledge about the concept of pain it still not a satisfactory account of how a physical act of c fibres firing gives rise to the conscious sensation of pain. Some philosophers like Levine agree that psycho-physical identity statements leave an inevitable explanatory gap; others like McGinn argue that this gap is potentially closable. Some like Papineau dismiss the problem completely and claim that there is no such thing as an explanatory gap, and all argument around it is purely “slipping back into dualist thinking”(Papineau, 1998)…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each time you prepare a meal your first thoughts should be on the nutritional value of the food and then “am I really hungry, or…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Epiphenomenalism Analysis

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For instance, the idea of supervenience can give us an account in terms of relations or dependence, and could be of use as another argument to support a physicalist view. Davidson (1970/202) maintains that: “…mental characteristics are in some sense dependent, or supervenient, on physical characteristics” (p. 119). He makes the significant remark that “Dependence or supervenience of this kind does not entail reducibility” (Davidson, 1970/2002, p.119). However, reduction seems to be is one of the keys points that define physicalism, for example, Papineau (1993) maintains that “physicalism requires reductionism” (p. 2). Nonetheless, so, if the main criterion for physicality is reducibility, how can it be that the mental, although physical, cannot be reduced to physics? If a mental event is identical with a brain event, then reduction could be a valid methodological approach: for instance Place (1956) or Smart (1959) argue that consciousness are process of the brain. However, Putnam (1967), Davidson (1970) and Fodor (1974) present strong arguments against such view. The next section will further discuss the problems of reductionism that encourage non-reductive…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mind-brain problem: The metaphysical debate over the nature of the connection between thoughts and the physical events that occur in the human brain.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capstone Project

    • 9065 Words
    • 29 Pages

    Faulkner,G., Taylor, A., Munro, S., Selby, P. and Gee, C. (2007). The acceptability of physical…

    • 9065 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In particular it will here be argued that functionalism can be reconciled with some form of ‘identity theory’ by following some ideas proposed by Lewis(1978) and Armstrong(1981). Furthermore, it will here be argued that as functionalism supports the multiple realizability view, it also supports a robust form of non-reductive physicalism. This non-reductive physicalism position is complemented by Donald Davidson’s views on the subject.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    David Hume is a renowned Philosopher that has shaped the ideas of cause and effect (causality) as we know them today. He suggested that true cause and effect relationship has to be the result of A causing B. The occurrence of B happening is contingent on the fact that A occurs before B, thus causing B to happen. Since he holds that this is the only rational way to conclude that one thing causes another to happen, he goes as far as to say that human beings will never know the exact cause that takes place in order for B to be the result. Hume comes to this conclusion because he maintains that there are secrete causes that cannot be observed by the human eye, thus it is impossible for humans to rationally conclude that one thing caused another…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stinkin Thinkin

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is it and what has been my experience with this thought concept? It is the answer that lies in what every person believes caused the event realizing that the Activation event (A) PLUS our Beliefs (B) equal the consequences (how we respond). A+B=C…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The want to eat is caused by looking for a sense of security. A sense of…

    • 1392 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. Arguments against physicalism In line with physicalism, a human being, including, of course, the brain, consists of merely physical substances. Not only the brain is described by physical characteristics, such as volume, weight and composition, but also the events that occur in the brain are physical, according to physicalists. For instance, in the nerve system the impulses are transmitted along connected neurons as a result of the electrical difference across their membranes.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays