Preview

Expansion of Power

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1173 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Expansion of Power
Kojo Ennin
Civics
Mr. Kinel
December 1, 2012
Expansion of the Presidency After each president has gone through their presidency, ever since the Father of our country George Washington, the powers of the president has increased little by little. To the extent that their powers are going beyond what the Constitution and the Framers expected it to be. Our current president, thanks to the input from past presidents, has so much power he does not realize. The issue now is whether to go against this expansion of power or to still watch as more presidents seize even more power, against the Constitution. There may be some problems attached to it but the way things have gone over the year, how president have taken more power, I actually agree with it. This increase of power is something that has wrought over the years and there is nothing we can do to change it back. As many people have put it the president is “also the Supreme Warlord of the Earth.” Like I have mentioned in my first paragraph the increase of the authority of the president satisfies me greatly. As Niccolo Machiavelli put it “He who wishes to be obeyed must know how to command.” Without the power the president has he/she is another tool of Congress if obeying the Constitution. The whole point of the Framers re-writing the Articles of Confederation is to create a stronger national government. What is the whole point if the most powerful person in the country has so much limitation put on him/her by the Constitution that he/she is pretty much powerless? The president has become, according to political author Gene Healy, “a soul nourisher, a hope giver, a living American talisman against hurricanes, terrorism, economic downturns, and spiritual malaise. He-or she-is the one who answers the phone at 3am to keep our children safe from harm. The modern president is America 's shrink, a social worker”. So to all you political analysts who study the expansion of presidential power if the



Cited: Healy, Gene. "The Cult of the Presidency." Reason Vol. 40, No. 2. June 2008: 20-28. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 03 Dec 2012.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Richard Neustadt’s Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents discusses the powers of the president and the way in which these functions have changed in the most recent centuries. He first notes the importance of persuasion, which, when successful, creates more beneficial and lasting outcomes than if the leader had simply used his or her ability to give commands. Furthermore, the author goes on to state that national chief executive officers should be more “skeptical than trustful, more curious than committed.” () Likewise, he or she should be surrounded with a variety of opinions from trusted advisors in order to promote decisions that result in the best outcome for the most amount of people. Moving on, the writer speaks of the great shift…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Political scientist Edward S. Corwin once observed that “the history of the presidency has been a history of aggrandizement.” Explain and critique Corwin’s observation from the standpoint of the allocation of constitutional powers and the Supreme Court’s interpretation of presidential…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think as the book states that the presidency and its scope have grown dramatically since its creation. I don’t think the framers had the vision of today’s world when they created the position. That being said, the one thing that has not changed or grown is the President still must answer to Congress and the people. I think he has a huge amount of responsibility and sometimes enough and sometimes not enough power. It just depends on the situation and where his presidential powers lie on the scale for that problem.…

    • 563 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is a review of the book “The History of the American Presidency” by John Bowman, published in 2005 by World Publications Group Inc. & JP, consisting of 200 pages. This book illustrates the evolution of America’s presidency since its inception. This review discusses the author’s main arguments and its strengths and weaknesses. It also discusses the credibility of the author and whether he was successful in attaining his purpose. Finally, my concluding view of the book will be provided.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In my opinion is I agree that the president has usurped the constitiutional power of the Congress. I agree this statement because he is wielding the most pontent legislative power. The Constitution does quote that “All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in the Congress of the United States.” Most people agree that he has usurped the Constitiutional Power of Congress. It also seems that the president seems to wield the legislative power. In Article 2, Section 3 of the Constitiution states that the president “shall take Care that the laws be faithfully executed.” Congress wields the legislative power and it seems the president is wielding that power.…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    would have a huge impact on the power contained in the office of the president.…

    • 2175 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are two perspectives on presidential power. The two perspectives are presidential power by persuasion and presidential without persuasion or unilateral. The first perspective where presidential power is persuasive means that the president needs help in order to achieve an outcome. The president tries to convince other branches of government or other high-ranking officials to implement an idea of his. This all depends on the president’s ability to bargain with other branches or even his own branch to influence policy. The Unilateral perspective means that the president can act alone when making policy decisions. The unilateral perspective forces the judiciary to react.…

    • 141 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Federalist and Anti-Federalist perspectives at first tend to appear to be polar opposites in nature. The Federalists supported and sought to ratify the Constitution of the United States of America. Whereas the Anti-Federalists were hesitant to do so, and feared that the powers allotted in the Constitution would result in the newly birthed United States descending into a monarchy. The very same form of government that had proved dissatisfactory to the colonists in the first place. Therefore it may appear to be a moot point when deciding whether both viewpoints would be in harmony or opposition in regards to the power held by the modern presidency. The Anti-Federalists believed that power should rest with the states. However the Federalists wanted a strong central government headed by one official. This was because the Articles of Confederation (which gave the majority of power to the states) had failed miserably. However, while the Federalists and Anti-Federalists held opposite viewpoints, they had the same goal in mind: To create a free and balanced society, “It is here taken for granted, that all agree in this, that whatever government we adopt, it ought to be a free one,” (Brutus, 25). However, due to the initial ambiguous measure the framers of the Constitution took with regards to the executive branch, there have historically been events of a United States President overstepping his boundaries and violating the merits of both U.S. and Constitutional doctrine. Therefore both the Federalists as well as the Anti-Federalists would agree that in light of decisions made during George W. Bush’s consecutive terms that the modern presidency must be restricted.…

    • 1791 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperial Power Dbq Essay

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To have the power to go beyond the constitution should be one of the president’s power when dealing with war or rebellion, and to protect the lives of US citizens or keep international peace in foreign countries. The presidents throughout history, when taking the action of going beyond the constitution, has helped the US when the south succeeded and when we wanted to help keep international peace. The President needs to have this power in order to become a better leader to its people and help whoever needs…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the framers of the Constitution designed the presidency, they had no way of predicting how the powers of the office would gradually expand over time. The Founders envisioned the executive to be independent – having no direct constituency relationship with either Congress or the public – as well as restrained. They gave the power to declare war to Congress, implicitly prohibiting the President from committing troops to a long-term conflict (Article I Section 8). However, if the Founders saw the presidency today, I believe they would strongly disapprove.Today, the executive is closely tied to popular will, not the Constitution. In many states, electors are legally obligated for the winner of the popular vote in their state. Many modern presidents…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over two hundred years ago people were asking how powerful should the president be? Is he too powerful now? Today, in the twenty-first century, political scientist, constituent, and even politicians are asking the same questions. One of the most notable debates over this subject stems from a disagree between Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton preferred a larger executive while Jefferson preferred a smaller one. When George Washington declared neutrality during a war between Britain and France, Jefferson did not believe that Washington had the constitutional power to do this. Hamilton decided to respond; he did so by publishing articles under the pseudonym, Pacificus.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This began a series of events that would shake the public’s confidence in its most visible symbol of American authority and prestige: the presidency” (Task List, 2013). In the midst of turmoil, deceit, scandal, and America’s outrage; bouncing back in a time of chaos was tumultuous.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Obama

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The president is more than unconstitutional, he is uncontrollable, too. President Obama is uncontrollable in his actions when illegal decisions are made more than once regarding Obamacare and when a large part of our government system is being questioned due to his disregard for the law. Obama went too far to get what he wanted. Checks and balances aren’t being taken seriously, if he can get away with it, so can everyone else. Obama unconstitutionally delayed the caps on payments without approval from Congress. He is uncontrollable and imperial because he shows with these examples that he thinks he can just go around Congress more than once regarding only one piece of legislation…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    John Tyler

    • 3283 Words
    • 14 Pages

    McPherson, James M. The American Presidents. “To the Best of My Ability.” 2004. Print. 22 February 2013.…

    • 3283 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Demir, T. & Nyhan, R. (2008) The Politics-Administration Dichotomy: An Empirical Search for Correspondence Between Theory and Practice.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays