Preview

Imperial Presidency: Overview

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2175 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Imperial Presidency: Overview
Imperial Presidency: Overview

In his book, The Imperial Presidency, Arthur Schlesinger recounts the rise of the presidency as it grew into the imperial, powerful position that it is today. His writing reflects a belief that the presidency is becoming too powerful and that very few people are making a real effort to stop it. He analyzes the back and forth struggle for power between Congress and the
Presidency. Schlesinger breaks up the first half of the book chronologically. He begins by discussing the areas concerning the presidency where the founding fathers agreed and also the areas where they disagreed. He then goes on to analyze the rise of the imperial presidency through war and recovery, with emphasis on the events of the twentieth century. After the war in Vietnam,
Schlesinger divides the book based on the specific nature of the events that had an impact on presidential power. He divides it based on domestic policy, foreign policy, and the affairs that go on in secrecy. Schlesinger provides an incredible amount of evidence to recount the ups and downs of the imperial presidency. He provides a base for his argument with an in-depth view of what the framers intended and how they set the stage for development over the next two centuries. An issue that Schlesinger focuses on is the presidents ability to make war. The decisions of the founders in this area would have a huge impact on the power contained in the office of the president.
The consensus amongst the framers was that the president, as Commander in Chief, had the ability to defend the United States and its interests, but the ability to declare war was vested in the Congress. This decision set the stage for the struggles between the president and congress. He also discussed the debate over the power institutionalized in the presidency. At the time, there were two schools of thought on the subject. Hamilton supported an active president, while
Jefferson argued in favor of a passive president. The



Bibliography: Imperial Presidency Arthur Schlesinger Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston 1973 copyright © 1973 by Arthur Schlesinger 505 pp. Presidential Power Richard Neustadt Simon & Schuster copyright © 1986 by Macmillan College Publishing Company, Inc

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    DBQ: The War Hawks

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1812, America was forced into war by a Congressional group called the “War Hawks.” The War Hawks, led by Henry Clay and John C. Calhoun, were supportive of war with Great Britain. The War Hawks were upset about what the war did for their economy and they did not like the Indians because they were allies of Britain. As a result of this group, the War of 1812 began.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It equips Congress with constitutional power over the president, and prohibits any one person from plunging the nation into war. In conclusion, the War Powers Resolution works well within the constitutional authority of Congress and strengthens the balance of powers among the branches of our government. In this scenario, the President violated the due process of issuing military action without the consent of Congress, and as a result, this case would be weighed in favor of…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Second Continental Congress met to determine if indeed the war had broken out and how the colonists would handle it. They wanted to show they were acting as an independent country without using that term (independent).…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Beard’s article, Framing the Constitution, alleges the members of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia were “disinterested” in providing basic rights for citizens. He stated that the framers of the Constitution of the United States were only concerned in improving their own economic well–being and personal agendas. Therefore, providing information of the events that led up to the Philadelphia Convention and an overview of the Constitution will dismiss his statements, and state his article was a self-serving, conspiracy theory.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The office of president today is very different from that envisaged by the framers of the constitution in 1787- the circumstances that have given rise to modern presidential power could not have been foreseen. However some argue that the office of president is one of inherent weakness rather than strength, and that the powers of the president were no guarantee that power could actually be exercised. In his view, presidential leadership was possible only when there were extraordinary crisis conditions such as depression or war. F.D. Roosevelt is often given as an example of such a president.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wanted to annex Hawaii, although opposed by queen, U.S. suceeded by Cleveland took office and said not until he was out of office could annexation occur.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This paved a way for the Declaration of Independence, which led to congress nominating him to take part in revising and finalizing the…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Congress only met up informally for discussions, it is probably due to this kind of setting that allowed conflicts to be resolved amicably. For example, Russia felt that the nation was owed all of Poland while Prussia had designs on Saxony. The Congress managed to reach a compromise whereby Russia had to share claim to Poland with Austria and Prussia. The role that Congress played in a bid to stop wars that could potentially occur due to territorial claims should not be ignored. This is evident in that the Congress had managed to bring about peace for almost 33 years.…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the attack on Pearl Harbor was an act of terrorism and endangered our soldiers. It was not difficult to appeal to the people’s emotion and convince Congress to issue a state of war against Japan. Seeing as it took not even an hour, but 33 minutes after Roosevelt delivered the speech for Congress to declare war on Japan. Moreover, being the President of the United States also establishes his credibility and a figure to believe amongst the people of America as well as announcing that as “Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, I have directed that all measures be taken for our defense. But always will our whole nation remember the character of the onslaught against us.”. Further proclaiming his authority.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imperial Presidency

    • 962 Words
    • 3 Pages

    6. What conclusions can you draw from the behavior of the public at Harrison's house?…

    • 962 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S. Entry into World War I

    • 2042 Words
    • 59 Pages

    Woodrow Wilson delivered his now-famous War Message to Congress on April 4, 1917. Four days later, Congress declared war and the United States became a formal partner in the war to end all wars. As the Wilson administration was to discover, however, declaring war and making war were two very different propositions. The former required only an abstract statement of ideals and justifications and a two-thirds Congressional majority; the latter required the massive mobilization of virtually every sector of American society - military, industrial, and economic, as well as public opinion. The Wilson administration sought to accomplish this daunting task in two concomitant and interdependent fashions. First, it undertook an unprecedented assumption of federal control and regulation. The federal government established an array of bureaus and agencies endowed with sweeping powers to regulate the nation’s economy and industrial production. Furthermore, it passed a series of laws designed to support these agencies and to stifle what it deemed subversive antiwar opinion and activity. Second, and of equal importance, the administration appealed to the public’s patriotism and sense of civic responsibility, effectively encouraging volunteerism in both the public and private sectors. Each of these tacks was bulwarked by a pervasive dose of pro-war government propaganda. In the end, in terms of raising an army, mobilizing the economy and influencing the outcome of the war, the administration’s mobilization efforts were largely successful. However, there were significant consequences to the government’s actions, most acutely in the realm of civil liberties, both during and in the aftermath of the war. One of the earliest examples of federal muscle in wartime mobilization was the passage of the Lever Act in August 1917. The act gave the president the power to regulate supplies and prices of food and fuel by creating two new government agencies: the United States Food Administration…

    • 2042 Words
    • 59 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cited: Adler, David. “The Constitution and Presidential War-making.” The Constitution and the Conduct of American Foreign Policy. University Press of Kansas, 1996 183-226.…

    • 2492 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Territorial Expansion

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It as a simple morning on the 4th of March 1801, when Thomas Jefferson gave his oath to office in the Capitol Building. A distilled feeling of uncertainty, as America put into office a Democratic-Republican, who caused tension to the federalist party after previously congress had issued the Alien and Sedition Acts. These acts enforced the deportation and imprisonment of illegal aliens by the President from the United States. To counter the acts, Jefferson and James Madison, secretary of state at the time, passed the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions which connotes that states have the right to consider constitutional the federal policy. At the rise of a new century, Jefferson’s inaugural address to a premature nation would officially illustrate America’s ambitions. He emphasized in his speech the importance of having both political parties set aside their beliefs and join together for the good of the Republic. The concept of Manifest Destiny has always been accepted by the mind most Americans, but the manner we achieve it has not always been the cleanest. Jefferson’s address viewed expansion in his address, as a means of “preserving and protecting the American Nation.” The mid-19th century political parties that questioned expansion all helped influence the government policies created before the Civil War.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    U.S President is often considered as the most powerful person on Earth. U.S President has many powers, but President cannot misuse his powers. The system called checks and Balances keeps everything in order for the U.S government to run. If Congress thinks that the president is misusing his power, the congress can impeach the president, but in order to do that congress requires 2/3 of majority votes. There are three branches in the U.S government, Legislative, Executive, and the judicial branches. The president is the head of the Executive branch, which is responsible for enforcing laws passed by the congress.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Power Of Presidency

    • 806 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The power of being president, and all the endless decisions that comes with it. Barack Obama has the final say of the legislative, executive, and judicial branch. These three branches make up America’s politics. Now the president can’t govern a whole country all by himself, he needs help. In irony the president may be called the most powerful man in the world but his politicians also control the outcome of his decisions. The president needs to take into consideration the powers of the other three branches. "A president cannot lead unless he appreciates the perspectives of other elected politicians and accepts their legitimacy." (Bowles) What has Obama been doing with his powers lately?…

    • 806 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Better Essays