Explain What Did Nicholas's Handbook Say About 'Half-Copying'
Write On Video Tutorials: Integrating sources in MLA style
1.) How did Anna know she wasn't plagiarizing the Kesan source?
To begin with, Anna knew she was not plagiarizing because she followed the set regulations and procedures required when quoting a source. First of all she used quotation marksin order to indicate that the information was a direct quote. Then she made sure to include the author’s name and the page number of the book from which she got the quote. These two aspects ensured that she recognized the author properly, so it was not plagiarism.
2.) What is a dropped quotation?
A dropped quotation, according to the tutor, is a quotation that a writer drops into the prose without any warning. Anna does not introduce the quote or offer any direct …show more content…
A summary is considerably shorter than a paraphrase of the same piece of work. On face value that is the main difference. However, substantially, paraphrasing provides more details of the piece than would a summary. The summary is by definition a brief account of the piece, so it seeks to capture the central point. It does not focus on details. 3.) What did Nicholas's handbook say about "half copying”?
‘half-copying’ is just as reprehensible as full-on copying. The manual says that academics depend on each other. No one, not even the most accomplished academic, knows everything about any subject, so research involves the work of others. It is therefore only fair that one recognizes the efforts others have put in their work. 4.) Why did Nicholas decide to include more quoted phrases from his Bryson source?
Like all academic writers, Nicholas decided to incorporate the lessons that he is teaching into his article. The central point for the Bryson quotes is to reinforce the point in the paragraph and the whole piece. It is a deliberate effort to show the student going through the tutorial how to use sources to strengthen one’s
1.) How did Anna know she wasn't plagiarizing the Kesan source?
To begin with, Anna knew she was not plagiarizing because she followed the set regulations and procedures required when quoting a source. First of all she used quotation marksin order to indicate that the information was a direct quote. Then she made sure to include the author’s name and the page number of the book from which she got the quote. These two aspects ensured that she recognized the author properly, so it was not plagiarism.
2.) What is a dropped quotation?
A dropped quotation, according to the tutor, is a quotation that a writer drops into the prose without any warning. Anna does not introduce the quote or offer any direct …show more content…
A summary is considerably shorter than a paraphrase of the same piece of work. On face value that is the main difference. However, substantially, paraphrasing provides more details of the piece than would a summary. The summary is by definition a brief account of the piece, so it seeks to capture the central point. It does not focus on details. 3.) What did Nicholas's handbook say about "half copying”?
‘half-copying’ is just as reprehensible as full-on copying. The manual says that academics depend on each other. No one, not even the most accomplished academic, knows everything about any subject, so research involves the work of others. It is therefore only fair that one recognizes the efforts others have put in their work. 4.) Why did Nicholas decide to include more quoted phrases from his Bryson source?
Like all academic writers, Nicholas decided to incorporate the lessons that he is teaching into his article. The central point for the Bryson quotes is to reinforce the point in the paragraph and the whole piece. It is a deliberate effort to show the student going through the tutorial how to use sources to strengthen one’s