Preview

Explain Why Great Britain Followed a Policy of Appeasement Toward Germany in the 1930s?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
611 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Why Great Britain Followed a Policy of Appeasement Toward Germany in the 1930s?
Explain why Great Britain followed a policy of appeasement toward Germany in the 1930s?

The appeasement policy, which can be defined as a diplomatic policy that hopes of preventing war by making concessions to an aggressor, was displayed by Great Britain towards Germany in the preface to World War II. However, it proved to be a spectacular failure, because leaders of the countries that were being appeased were taking advantages of these policies and were building up their own power since other world leaders would not take any decisive action. Numerous factors consisting social, economical and political aspects formed the basis for the pursuing appeasement in the aftermath of World War I.
At the Paris Peace Conferences, Britain, under the leadership of George Wilson had a hidden agenda. Britain have felt that the Treaty of Versailles had been too harsh on the Germans, and considered appeasement as a method of correcting the wrongs that German had been dealt in the aftermath of World War I. Wilson did not want full-scale reparations imposed on Germany, because they were still valued as a significant trading partner. Such views continued until the end of Chamberlain’s rule in office. As many countries were trying to recover from the depression, Britain saw Germany as a valuable trading partner to get the economy going.
When examining the policy of appeasement, one has to understand the conditions and pressures of which the allied powers faced in the inter-war period. At the time, Russia was under the rule and authority of Communism. As a result, it was undergoing a complete re-vamp of its industrial sector and economy. Because of such rigorous change, the allies feared that communism would eventually grow and spread into their various spheres of influence. The allied powers thought that Germany would serve as a good buffer zone. The reasoning behind that was that it was better to have a fascist Germany act as a divider between them and Russia than to have a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    German Aggression Dbq

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Within two years of consolidating power over Germany, Hitler and the Nazi Party had commenced operations to reverse the provisions of the Treaty of Versailles which had treated the German people in an unfair manner. Among these reversals included foreign diplomatic measures which would ensure that Germany would annex the territories it had lost at the conclusion of World War One. In September of 1938, with Europe on the brink of yet another major war, Great Britain’s Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain called the four powers – Germany, Italy, France, and Great Britain – to convene in Munich and address German aggression against Czechoslovakia and the Sudetenland. Among Neville Chamberlain’s goals for the conference was the notion to avoid…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    WWII DBQ

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During the early 1920s, World War I had just ended, and many countries were not happy with the outcome. The Treaty of Versailles was a poor settlement to World War I, and left three particular countries unhappy; Germany, Italy, and Japan. The Treaty of Versailles left many limitations on Germany, and failed to give Italy and Japan the recognition they deserved. During the 1930s, these countries decided to take action, and fight for what they wanted. Though both appeasement and collective security were taken in response, collective security proved to be the more effective response to the aggression.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another result of appeasement was Hitler gaining the support he needed as time passed. Lastly, Germany took control of Austria. The Holocaust and many other events could have been avoided if the world leaders did not choose to give in to the demands of Hitler. Even though the world leaders thought they were doing the right thing to protect their nation by standing by and doing nothing as Hitler went forth with his plans, they were actually hurting their countries even more because by choosing to appease Hitler, they allowed him to do things that would change the world…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II DBQ

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the early 1920s, as World War I ended, nations looked for peace as an outlet and hope for the future. As time passed, most countries were happy that the Great War had ended, however they were upset with the outcome. Since there were many costly expenses from the war, it caused many of the hostile nations to look for strong rulers for change. This allowed many harsh dictators to rise to power. These dictators were aggressive rulers and took forceful actions. In order to combat these aggressive rulers, other nations tried to resist war and give in to their demands. This type of action was known as appeasement. Not all countries felt the same way about this response; other countries believed that a collective security would work better.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. How and why was Germany allowed to annex Austria and the Sudetenland? Was there any justification for Britain and France’s policy of appeasement?…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think the most effective response is with out a doubt collective security. (Doc 4) In 1938 Britain, France, and Italy met with Hitler to discuss his demand for the Sudetenland. Hitler got what he wanted from this meeting because of appeasement. Europe was happy from this because it avoided war. This did not benefit the Czechs at all though. For some reason Neville Chamberlain favored appeasement. (Doc 5) He thinks appeasement is the best way because he believes war is a "fearful thing." He thinks that appeasement will benefit Europe. Winston Churchill disagreed with Chamberlain's policy of appeasement. (Doc 6) He believed that keeping peace depends on holding back the aggressor. He also thinks we lost many opportunities in the quest for peace. He believes it was the people in control of our political affairs fault. Another view on appeasement was also put out there by A.J.P. Taylor. It stated that since the majority of German people put Hitler into power they were the only ones that could turn him out. Also he said some "appeasers" feared that the defeat of Germany would be followed by Russian domination over most of Europe. In another excerpt an author named Keith Eubank states that stopping Hitler prior to 1939 was not an issue. (Doc 9) He says that Hitler had too massive of a force and that nothing he had done had been considered that dangerous at that point in time. All this options but still if the rest of the country didn't do something besides just keeping appeasement Hitler was going to just keep demanding more and more. This would have left Europe ten times worse off. They made the right choice on going into Collective Security. They should have done this from the beginning instead of wasting so much time and losing so much, to just end up going into war anyways, just later in time. Collective Security…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 2 Dbq Essay

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    World War II is the cruel, black scar that marks the back of the Twentieth century. After World War I the seeds of World War Two were planted through the unbearable burdens put on the German people from the infamous treaty of Versailles. With the rise of the notorious dictator Hitler, the German people were hungry for a new beginning. Appeasement was one of the biggest things that lead to World War II. It basically just postponed the War from happening. Leaders arose in countries that were unsatisfied with the results of the past war, World War I. Italy, Germany and Japan took action and no one was stopping them. The Most effective response to aggression at this time was surely collective security. Using Appeasement got the countries nowhere…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    France and UK came up with the policy of appeasement which was a policy with nazi germany that would allow hitler to take a lot more land than he was supposed to. The reason being is the policy was put into place so that the UK and france would let Hitler do what he wanted as long as he didnt do what they told him not to do. The policy of appeasement however did not work because Hitler was not someone you could appease. Once Hitler invaded poland the policy ended thus ending the reign of letting hitler walk all over…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Euro Dbq

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Countless political problems were directly caused by the Versailles Treaty. The Big Four consisted of Prime Minister David Lloyd George of Britain, Prime Minister Georges Clemenceau of France, Prime Minister Orlando Vittorio of Italy, and President Woodrow Wilson of America. They met at the lavish palace of Versailles Wilson brought his Fourteen Points plan, which would supposedly end war forever if followed. He called for open diplomacy, free trade, and political freedom for Russia (Doc. 1). As the only head of state at the meeting, Wilson undoubtedly had America’s best interests in mind. He was, however, an arrogant man, and he was spoiled and thus held high expectations. Wilson also spoke to Congress in 1919 and addressed the ever-increasing nationalistic wave; he encouraged African and Asian countries to follow suit (Doc. 2). The bulk of the Versailles Treaty doled out Germany’s numerous punishments for “starting the war.” Germany was forced to pay for all of the damage caused by the war, and their army had to be exceptionally reduced. Germany lost great amounts of their land. The Baltic countries that were so adamant in getting their independence from the Ottoman Empire received it, but as a huge, joint country known as Yugoslavia. Land was also taken by Germany and pulled together to form Czechoslovakia (Doc. 8).Germany, however, remained somewhat optimistic and tried to regain their power. If anything, their…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was difficult to make a peace settlement that would please all the Allies because all of them had very different wishes and views on what should happen next. France and Britain disagreed with most of Woodrow Wilson’s views, as he was too idealist and believed in self-determination, the idea that nations should rule themselves rather than by others, whereas the other allies believed in imperialism, the opposite of self-determination. David Lloyd George did not want the treaty to be too harsh, fearing German revenge, and desired to keep the trade with Germany. Georges Clemenceau’s main aim was to cripple Germany so hard that it would never dare to try declaring a war in Europe again. Woodrow Wilson was the most idealist out of all the allies.…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Hitler’s power began to rise during the 30s, many Americans still believed that they could avoid the issue through a policy of appeasement (Document G), though it failed and both Britain and France…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    q. Failure of appeasement, Munich: This marks the end of creating an international policy. Hitler went through a series of marches with no opposition. Appeasement is the idea of giving someone what they wants to get them to shut up, even though it isn’t good for them. The Munich Conference Hitler lies and promises that the expansion was over. Hitler’s book, Mein Kampf explained he was going to continue…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The final treaty that was agreed on was the Treaty Of Versailles. Germany thought they were getting Wilson’s peace plan but instead, they got this. The Treaty of Versailles consisted of many ways of punishing Germany. The war guilt clause was a part of the treaty. The war guilt clause stated that Germany had to accept the blame of causing the war. Another part noted that Germany had to give up it’s colonies. It also consisted of the fact that Germany had to pay all war costs. This means they had to pay their war cost, as well as the Allies‘ war costs, which was over $200 billion. The Allies also wanted to disarm Germany. This meant that they wanted to cut off Germany’s army and navy, so they wouldn’t be able to fight another war for a long time.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Woodrow Wilson, President of the United States of America, was a key influencer of policy regarding Germany at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919. Without Wilson, reparations paid by Germany to Britain and France would have been much more punitive and the consequences all the more severe. Wilsons ideals were made clear in his “Fourteen Points” speech were he states that, “We do not wish to injure her or to block in any way her legitimate influence or power.” Wilson’s intention is to reduce tension in Europe and to make sure that Germany could not resume hostilities. Unlike Great Britain and France, Wilson does not want Germany to pay more than she can afford.…

    • 1901 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    World War I: The Great War

    • 2689 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Although Wilson’s intentions were good, the European nations had other plans as far as alleged “peace talks”. Secret negotiations had been made throughout the battling countries during the war and made the aftermath a lot more complicated as far as sorting out how to rebuild Europe (“World War I”). Much of the negotiations made after World War I greatly contributed to the beginnings of World War II. Perhaps one of the most controversial plans involving how to begin rebuilding was Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points and the widely discussed national self-determination. Although widely criticized by public leaders, the outcome of the infamous Fourteen Points is forever remembered because "its fate was Wilson’s greatest failure” (Throntveit). Wilson was simply ahead of his time by suggesting such radical ideas in the fragile state of the world. The President wanted no blame to be put on Germany, unlike France. Since France believed it was the “most affected” by the war, it believed that Germany should take the blame and pay reparations for all it had done. These ideas went completely against Wilson’s ideology for a more peaceful world after such a conflict. He believed that blame would only make matters worse and create a deeper conflict that would soon lead to another war (Throntveit). The Treaty of Versailles (1919) was supposed to include Wilson’s…

    • 2689 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays