Preview

Explain Why Socrates Argument That People Should Follow The Social Contract

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
343 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Why Socrates Argument That People Should Follow The Social Contract
The social contract theory mainly began during the Age of Enlightenment where it was introduced politically; however, the idea had originated from philosopher Socrates during Ancient Greek time.
A compromise between an individual or individuals government and themselves on the duties and responsibilities that they were born with.
Socrates argument is that people should follow the Social Contract Theory since it was the origin point of how people were born, how one got educated, and how one were to act through adulthood. In the book, Crito, Socrates states that by the time they reach adulthood they could either stay and accept their rules and laws or leave with their belongings. He eventually chose to stay in Athens and be executed rather than

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Las Hermanas

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Roman Catholic Church is something my family and I are familiar with. In Los Angeles I went to a co-ed Catholic school called St. Eugene. When I first picked up the book I was excited to find out the back story of the organization of Las Hermanas. “In the forefront of liberation of the Mexican American community are beautiful and courageous women, women who know how to fight,” Canciόn de Las Hermanas. That quote summarizes the movement dealing with Latina women in the Catholic Church.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    But on the other hand this choice has to be made "on attaining manhood". If the individual decides to stay and live there then he is automatically participating in the law making process and he engages in the "political association" (The Politics). In conclusion he must completely obey any decision the state makes concerning him even if this decision involves his death. He continues and states that if he would escape, the city and its laws could be destroyed. The judicial system would have no more power because the people will stop trusting the system. Chaos would be the imminent outcome. Therefore we get to another minor premise that states that destroying Athens laws will hurt its citizens. Committing an act that could harm other people is against Socrates premise of living well. By harming other people you destroy your own character and conscience. According to Socrates life is not worth living with a ruined conscience the same as it is not worth living "with a body which is worn out and ruined in health"…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that Socrates has made the absolute most just decision with everything he could have done. It still remains remarkable to me that he had turned down such an easy and pleasant life of exile to take on his execution that he is innocent for. Although it seems like such a hard thing to pass on, I know I would have done the exact same thing after some deep thought about how it would impact myself along with the rest of the community. I fully stand behind Socrates’ decision by staying in prison and taking on his…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believes that these laws has given him birth, have educated him, raised him and have shared the wealth of Athens with him. Socrates thinks that the people of Athens are free to leave if they find the laws unjust, but if they want to stay then they must abide by the laws of Athens. The only thing that he points out are the people in power. He thinks that the people who are in power have changed the original laws for their own benefit. “been wronged, not by the Laws, but by men” (p 54). Socrates accepts death penalty because he wants the laws should be remain in place. Given opportunities such as exile or apology, he argues that if he escape from the prison, it will destroy the laws of the city and, eventually, the city because according to Socrates no city can survive without its laws being enforced. Therefore, Socrates steadfast by his believes of not violating any…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    • 1. In the Apology, Socrates recounts how he disobeyed the unjust order of the Thirty Tyrants to arrest a fellow citizen; he also claims that he will never stop philosophizing, regardless of what the legally constituted political authority commands. Yet, in the Crito, Socrates provides numerous arguments for obeying the decision of the legally constituted political authority, even though the decision (to put Socrates to death) was unjust. Critically assess whether Socrates’s view about political obligation in the two texts is consistent.…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Doubtlessly, Socrates believed that fear of death should never be a reason for one to change one's beliefs. These beliefs are spoken about largely in Crito; that he cannot break a just contract between himself and the law nor do any harm to any entity. Socrates was willful to abide by Athenian law and the legal judgments made according to them even if they were incorrect. He believed that he gave his obedience in exchange for the life that those laws provided…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    His termination was postponed due to a religious festival, for thirty days. During those thirty days his friends and student would try to convince Socrates to escape Athens. His students and friends wanted him to go to somewhere other then his doomed fate in Athens. He didn’t want to lose his fight and dignity with the people of Athens who disagreed with his believes. So he refused their offers for transport to other places.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Plato's Crito

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Socrates, addressing Crito’s argument to help Socrates escape from jail, tells Crito that his enthusiasm is appreciated however it is too emotional for figuring out what is right and wrong. He explains that decisions must be made rationally, and that just because circumstances may change, the values that he has always…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates Vs Crito

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages

    In the reading CRITO the verdict of execution has already been given and now Socrates and colleagues must make the decision to flee the city of Athens or stay and face his fate. In this conversation you have Critos point of view and Socrates. Based on Critos reasoning he states three reasons why Socrates should stay, the first two being selfish but the third hitting home.…

    • 2078 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Crito

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates also makes the point that it is better to do right than wrong, no matter what the circumstances. He felt that, although the jurors wronged him by unjustly condemning him, it would still be wrong to violate the laws by escaping. He goes on to say that he does not believe in consciously doing wrong to others as a means of retaliation and that it would indeed undermine his whole life's work. Socrates does not blame the laws which sentenced him, but the people. He goes on to tell Crito that the law has already given him a long and successful life. He explains that he actually owes the city much for his life. He believes that he has a contract with Athens, which would be broken, if he dodged his death. It was under…

    • 890 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since Athenians were so close minded, they out casted anyone that didn't conform to their traditions. They should have been open to anything and not simply dislike a person or a situation because it didn’t follow their ideals. Socrates’ trial eventually led to his death and this illustrates that everyone has limitations. We can’t reject what we were taught or certain laws in society just because we don’t agree. Society functions because we work together and change together not because we do what we want. Furthermore, when Socrates was on trial he made a point to say that the democracy was poison to the people. Yet when his friend Crito offers him an escape from his death he denies the offer because he believes it is unjust to not face his execution. There are many theories behind why Socrates said no since he didn’t support the democracy; I believe it is because he had an open mind. (Crito,76-77). Yes, him being open-minded lead to his death; however, it indicates that he understood limitations of the law and respected societies perspectives.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Out of the many female characters in To Kill A Mockingbird, Calpurnia plays a mother like roll, she has many views about the Tom Robinson case and the Maycomb town, and she has many of he characteristics and opinions shown in the novel. Calpurnia played a major roll in the novel because she was a mother like character, her views about Tom’s case and Maycomb illustrate what it is like where the book takes place, and last but not least her characteristics and behavior.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After being convicted of his ‘crimes’, he is given an opportunity from his friends to escape, but he refuses. The main reason is that the people will know that they convicted an innocent man because they were annoyed with Socrates. When he is dead he will go to the underworld and be able to talk to far more interesting people. Also the people of Athens would only get a break from Socrates. When they die he’ll be there to greet them, and they can’t run away from him where they’re…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cyber bullying is when someone is harassing someone else online with electronic means like a phone or computer or even through messaging. It’s a type of bullying that is not face to face. The difference between cyber bullying is different is because it can happen twenty four hours a day, seven days a week. Some may be bullied when they are by themselves. There are many risks to cyber bullying, the worst one would be attempt of suicide because the victim might be confused and might not know how to ask for help. The victim may start physical harm. “Physical harm and include depression, anxiety, social isolation and an increased risk for attempting suicide’, said Peggy Andover, a psychology professor at Fordham University in New York. Usual they victim will turn to alcohol or drugs because they think that they can run away from their problems. They might start skipping school, and might not want to attend school because they might want to isolate themselves. That leads to low grade and a high chance of dropping out of high school. The victim might suffer from low self-esteem and all of these effects of cyber bully can cause health issues. In a report by the ABC News in 2006, a survey was conducted on 1500 students in the grades between 4-8 and gave the following findings.42% of the children had experienced some form of bullying while online. 35% of them had received threats while online.21percentage had received threatening and mean emails or other forms of messages. 58% of the kids admitted that they had received hurtful information while online while the most shocking statistic was that 58% of these kids did not tell any adult about the form of harassment they receive while online. This clearly shows that a very large number of teenagers are being involved in cyber bullying and their parents or teachers are not even aware. Just imagine how many victims there are suffering because of cyber bullying. Imagine…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument that he does not deserve punishment is the most compelling case that I found. The argument Socrates uses has been proven to be not only valid, but also sound which makes it a very compelling case for Socrates not to be punished. The jury however does not appeal to his sense of defending himself and sentences him to death. Socrates was wrongly sentenced to death because the punishment that should have been issued would be counseling. The main question is still raised from Socrates argument that if no one intentionally does harm which would lead to no punishment being issued, then why is there a court system for people to be tried. This would suggest that either Socrates argument is flawed that people do intentionally cause harm to others, (which is shown to not be true) or the second option the people of Athens are flawed in the way they persecute their own people in a system that is…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays