Explain Why Trains Are Better Than Buses
Trains arrived on the scene in 1804 and buses in the 1830s. They are both popular forms of mass transit, and methods of getting several people from place to place quickly. Some people prefer trains over buses and vice versa. Which one you choose will depend on a number of factors.
Firstly, most people choose buses more than trains, because their tickets are generally less expensive. They also have more stops and can reach more destinations that their rail-riding rivals. In contrast, train tickets are more expensive, because trains are longer and therefore require more complex maintenance. They always have at least two crew members: a conductor and a driver plus several on board service crew in order to function properly, while buses only have a driver operating them.
If it is a long trip, the bus may stop at diners and restaurants so the passengers can enjoy a meal. However, trains have very limited choices of food, unless they are luxury trains, such as Amtrak’s Auto Train. Trains usually come with on board restrooms and showers unlike some buses which come with only one restroom. Likewise, one has to pay for the meal themselves whether they take the …show more content…
If you are traveling from coast to coast or from the suburbs to town, then taking the train might be a good option, because trains rarely get stuck in traffic. Trains have to slow down at maintenance zones, but buses can go around damaged roads at a cost of limiting how much luggage one can carry. Trains have a much higher luggage capacity and occupancy than buses and are more suited for people who are carrying more than three bags. Similarly, both can be delayed by breakdowns and must stop to refuel. Fuel stops for trains are longer, because they have larger fuel tanks to accommodate long journeys. Generally, trains consume more fuel than buses, because they need to pull heavier loads. Therefore, buses sometimes get from origin to destination faster than
Firstly, most people choose buses more than trains, because their tickets are generally less expensive. They also have more stops and can reach more destinations that their rail-riding rivals. In contrast, train tickets are more expensive, because trains are longer and therefore require more complex maintenance. They always have at least two crew members: a conductor and a driver plus several on board service crew in order to function properly, while buses only have a driver operating them.
If it is a long trip, the bus may stop at diners and restaurants so the passengers can enjoy a meal. However, trains have very limited choices of food, unless they are luxury trains, such as Amtrak’s Auto Train. Trains usually come with on board restrooms and showers unlike some buses which come with only one restroom. Likewise, one has to pay for the meal themselves whether they take the …show more content…
If you are traveling from coast to coast or from the suburbs to town, then taking the train might be a good option, because trains rarely get stuck in traffic. Trains have to slow down at maintenance zones, but buses can go around damaged roads at a cost of limiting how much luggage one can carry. Trains have a much higher luggage capacity and occupancy than buses and are more suited for people who are carrying more than three bags. Similarly, both can be delayed by breakdowns and must stop to refuel. Fuel stops for trains are longer, because they have larger fuel tanks to accommodate long journeys. Generally, trains consume more fuel than buses, because they need to pull heavier loads. Therefore, buses sometimes get from origin to destination faster than