As veterans of both the blue and grey replaced bullets with words, a new distinction from history and memory formed. Publishing magazines like Century actively solicited veterans, in particular, officers, to write personal accounts of key battles. However, Century’s editors refused to publish any gruesome pieces depicting battlefield carnage. They strove to further the notion of brotherhood by publishing stories that highlighted shared hardships. By soliciting rank-and-file, officers and high-ranking generals to write for them, the magazine achieved two important goals: a complete soldiers’ account of the war (history) and the spread of reconciliationism (memory). “The Century editors,” Blight…
At the beginning of the book private Archie Lemon thinks about the war that suppose to “end injustice,” and that he doesn't mind getting killed, because the people coming after him will live in “happiness and peace” (23). Such a false propaganda is recognized by soldiers fifty pages later. They realize that the war “was brought about moneyed interests for its own selfish ends,” because idealism and patriotism have nothing to do with the war. They call it brutal and degrading, and, “fools who fight, are pawns shoved about to serve the interest of others” (96). March in the 30s recognizes of what the war becomes in the twenty first century; a character name Sergeant Theodore Donohoe back then sees the war as a business (because today it is fought for the territory or land resources); he states that in order to get anywhere in it, one has to adjust oneself to its peculiarities and “play the cards the way they fall” (30). Unfortunately, not a lot of soldiers have learned or will ever learn how to play this game…
Written by a novel writer in a Minnesota paper, but was delivered as a speech at a Students Against War teach-in in Duluth, Minnesota (USA)…
As long as man has had the ability to think for himself, there has been conflict and war. Wars are waged by the rich and powerful, but fought by the poor masses who march, inexorably into the meat grinder. The question of “why do soldiers fight?” arises when looking at the study of warfare. What compelled the hoplite from Sparta, the foot soldier in Napoleon’s Grand Army, the American Infantryman on Omaha Beach, or the Army Ranger in Baghdad to willingly enlist and fight for their cause? The most devastating war in American history was by far the Civil War, claiming more American lives in four years than all other American wars (except World War I and II) combined. What is it that made these hundreds of thousands of men and women abandon their homes and fight against the nation that their forefathers had fought to gain the independence of not a century before. Many scholars believe that slavery, “states rights”, and freedom were the driving factor in these soldier’s minds. However, there was far more than simple ideology that drove these soldiers to Bull Run, Shiloh, Gettysburg, and Appomattox. Other factors that drove these soldiers into service were a sense of patriotism, their comrades in arms, the need to prove themselves, religion, and the defense of freedom and property to name a few. In For Cause and Comrades by James M. McPherson, McPherson argues that ideology plays a major role in why soldiers choose to fight, but in the heat of battle, ideology is forgotten and the aforementioned reasons become a significant reason as to why they choose to stay.…
In one of Peter Singer’s arguments defending animals rights he counter argues against Thomas Taylor a philosopher who wrote A Vindication of the Rights of Brutes which was a counterargument against Mary Wollstonecraft (Singer, 1). In Singer’s reply to Taylor he says that one might reply by saying the case for equality between men and women cannot be given to non-human animals (Singer, 2). To summarize this argument, Singer says that women are just as intelligent and capable of voting as men so they are extended this right, while dogs are not mentally capable of recognizing and understanding the significance of voting so they are not given this right (Singer, 2). He then goes onto say that men and women resemble each other closely therefore…
The primary focus of representation 1 is that to portray/inform people how the war had an impact towards the people and it concentrates on also how they reacted to it. It’s an online academic student journal. This article is written by Craig Stewart-Hunter.…
This meant that even though they were required to carry the physical load and bear the emotional consequences, they still had to “fight” for survival. Every characteristic or thought was taken in a positive manner and helped them develop confidence and motivation that lead them to overcome the devastation of war. For example there was an epiphany for Jimmy Cross at the end of the story when he realized the predicament of not being focused in war. This lead him to burn the letters, which shows a great deal of confidence and motivation, developed during war. The act of him burning the letter made sure that he was willing to forget the fantasies about his girlfriend Martha and become focused in war. He had managed to acquire the courage by simply an incident that could have potentially proven to be fatal. Therefore this helped in developing confidence and the ability to be focused while also motivating him to be alert in war. Therefore this gives us insight that the author provides details about the consequences of war faced by the soldiers not only physically but also mentally such as fear, love and grief. The ability or mental strength required to overcome the atrocities of war is immense and this is intensified by gravity of the precarious situation. “They carried their reputation.” Thereby leading to this conclusion that war has many social and personal consequences that are reluctantly compelled onto a soldier but it undeniably lead to the development of confidence and…
[ 2 ]. Michael S. Foley, Home Fronts A Wartime America Reader (New York: The New Press, 2008), 56…
Ernest Hemingway in “ Soldier’s Home” represents the life of Harold Krebs as an example of the effects on people and communities as well as a country as a whole caused by wars. There appears to be a blatant lack of respect for the main character from family and friends. This lack of respect is shown through the author’s discussion of a lack of empathy, confidence, and lack of placement. Hemingway shows the reader a view of the returning soldier from war and his clear displacement from “home.”…
Faust, P.L. (2002). Historical times encyclopedia of the civil war. Retrieved April 14, 2007, from http://www.civilwarhome.com/warcost.htm…
Americans, more than any country, tend to be very prideful of our young, yet extensive, war repertoire. Although there is nothing coherently wrong with this feeling of pride, we often forget the sacrifices made in the form of lives, in order for those iconic images to be taken. In James Bradley’s Flags of Our Fathers, he makes sure to emphasize the outer effects of war that reaches past that of what we can see in those instilled images. Specifically, the hundreds of thousands of soldiers that helped lead to victory and who were not credited, and also the families that were crippled by this sense of emptiness and fear while their sons sacrificed their lives for their country. He also made sure the mention the effect media had on those that were home and unaffiliated with the war, and how in turn it inspired boys to be thrown into situations beyond what they expected. As the book follows the individual lives that raised the flag in Iwo Jima, we get to see from a close perspective how the war really looked liked, instead of how it was often depicted. Although pictures are used to tell our story as a nation, it fails to exemplify the degree of suffering that all those men had to go through.…
The first essay G.I Joe: Fighting for Home by John Morton Blum and the second essay American Liberals: Fighting for a Better World by Alan Brinkley both 'look at the experience of the war from different vantage points: that of the soldier fighting for his own elemental survival as well as for his country, and that of the society back home.”…
Throughout American history, our military has been made up of very diverse people. From rich to poor, strong to weak, with all sorts of race and religions, we see this organization that fights and wins wars. They hold the frontlines, protecting this country, and can arguably be seen as the muscle of the United States. The people in the military are also seen as heroes, murderers and many things, but with politics and opinions set aside, I want to take this time to analyze the military with a literary viewpoint. I plan to break down the logistics of military communication, and show how they form a discourse community.…
Bibliography: The Madison Freedom Fighters, "Madison 3rd Grade Class Asked to Write Anti-War Propaganda Letters." http://www.psaf.org/archive/2005/jan-jun2005/MadisonThirdGradeIraqAssignment120905.htm. 11/23/06. SAF. 22 Apr 2007 .…
Is kidnapping always seen in a negative way? When you think “kidnapping” your first thoughts are fear. But in The Ransom of Red Chief we see kidnapping in a different light. It is funny and not serious unlike Lindbergh baby kidnapping.…