studies psychologist suggest that the accuracy of eyewitness suggest that information given from them is far less reliable than we might have first thought. However you could criticise the Loftus and Palmers study and claim that it was not done in a real life situation so it may not have had the same impact as maybe a real life accident may have had as many may have not been emotionally effective. Moreover the participants were awaiting for something to happen to therefore you result in demand characteristics. Also they tested students who may be better at recalling information rather than someone much older which shows low population validity.
studies psychologist suggest that the accuracy of eyewitness suggest that information given from them is far less reliable than we might have first thought. However you could criticise the Loftus and Palmers study and claim that it was not done in a real life situation so it may not have had the same impact as maybe a real life accident may have had as many may have not been emotionally effective. Moreover the participants were awaiting for something to happen to therefore you result in demand characteristics. Also they tested students who may be better at recalling information rather than someone much older which shows low population validity.