F3ead Vs D3a Essay

Without a doubt Find, Fix, Finish, Exploit, Analysis, Disseminate (F3EAD) has more steps than Decide, Detect, Deliver, and Assess (D3A). However, this does not translate into a more holistic or flattened approach. The authors speak about F3EAD as if it is the one doing the work. What they fail to mention is how F3EAD and D3A are simple mnemonics used to assist with the memorization of the intelligence cycle. In my opinion, neither serves as a way to improve the process. The authors briefly mention, “distinctions between the ways SOF and conventional forces implement F3EAD”. These distinctions have more to do with the success of the Special Operations Forces intelligence cycle, allowing for improved decision making. This is particularly true when looking at Special Forces as a whole. There are two distinct reasons we are more successful in the application of the intelligence process than conventional forces; our Detachment structure and maturity level on the Detachment.
Detachments are one of few combat arms entities that have intelligence personnel organic to the force. Not only do we have these positions built into our Detachment’s Modified Table of Organization and Equipment (MTOE), but we fill them through our own ranks. Special Forces Intelligence Sergeants serve in one of the feeder
They are typically older and more experienced than conventional combat arms units. This experience is one hundred percent related to the success of the intelligence cycle. Experienced Soldiers understand the importance of intelligence, and how it relates to operations. An example of this regimental understanding is evident in our class. When asked, our class simultaneously stated intelligence drives operations. This is due to the maturity level throughout our force. Our Soldiers understand that without intelligence they will not have missions to