Preview

FISA Pros And Cons

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
973 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
FISA Pros And Cons
Document Summary
Document 26 pertains to the NSA procedures that deal with acquisition and archiving of communications of U.S. citizens. It is one of the top-secret documents that was leaked by Snowden and published by The Guardian. The document lists the procedures meant to monitor and track any suspicious, terroristic activities, and events that impose the endangerment of a human’s life under the FISA act. The focus of the surveillance is to specifically monitor any foreign communications between a U.S. citizen and non-citizens. The document lists that all forms of communication regarding a U.S. citizen can be intercepted and archived by the NSA if they have had contact with a non-U.S. citizen whether or not that person is determined as a
…show more content…
citizens without their knowledge as long as they have had conducted any means of communication with a non-U.S. citizen/foreign enmity (Such as businesses, stores, etc.). This detail about the NSA’s actions I think is considerably problematic as the communications that can be stored include any internet communications. With the internet people, can communicate with anyone around the world i.e. non-U.S. citizens via any means as long as it exists on the internet such as social media, games, online-chatrooms. The biggest problem with the NSA actions is that U.S. citizens participating in these communications do not know that their activities are being monitored and reviewed by the NSA and being determined if these communications are acts of terroristic behavior or espionage against the U.S. Though the procedures may seem overly extensive, it is understandable that these actions in an event of terrorism are crucial in the prevention and tracking of guilty parties in regards to a terroristic attack. However, the unknown acquisition of information about a U.S. citizen because of their contact with a foreign person is redundant because of the need to acquire the information even if the persons are not a threat. From my understanding, I think that the NSA actions are excessive and harming themselves and the public as they are acquiring and …show more content…
citizens without consent after the Snowden leaks. In the memorandum, President Obama explains the needs and reasoning for the acquisition of data as a measure of national security, extending that need to common security with U.S. allies since with the advancement of technology new threats to national security are created such as cyber and telecommunication threats and the U.S, must be equipped to deal with these new threats. In the document, President Obama establishes a Review group as a supplement to the FISA and USA Patriot Act that will determine whether the U.S. should act on a situation, while following appropriate policies, such as public disclosure

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On May 7, 2015 the Federal Court of Appeals in New York ruled that the National Security Agency's collection of American phone records in bulk is illegal. Specifically, they ruled that the practice did not fall under the scope of the USA Patriot Act, which allows wire tapping of individuals to detect and prevent terrorism. What is the USA Patriot Act? The USA Patriot Act is a 10-letter acronym for uniting and strengthening America by providing appropriate tools required to intercept and obstruct terrorism act of 2001. It was passed by Congress following the terrorist attacks of September 11 and signed into law by George W. Bush in 2001. Later when it was set to expire in 2011 Barack Obama renewed the law for another 4 years. The Patriot Act…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Act, aimed at updating both the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 and the Electronics Communications Privacy Act of 1986 is composed of 10 titles all of which were hurried through Congress on October 24th, 2001 and passed the senate the following day, “…with little deliberation. Unlike a typical statute, neither the House of Representatives nor the Senate issued a report on the PATRIOT act.” (Standler, 2007-2008, p. 4) To this day, the Patriot Act remains controversial; its supporters uphold it as a requirement for The War on Terrorism and for the enforcement of modern electronic communications law. The Act’s critics cite its numerous infringements on civil and individual rights. Title II, considered the most controversial, deals directly with surveillance, wiretapping, and computer fraud. Title II also details sanctions placed on trade with the Taliban, Syria and North Korea. The Patriot Act’s Title II, Enhanced Surveillance Procedures is a breach of privacy and infringes upon the tenants of our Fourth Amendment rights.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) is an Act of Congress passed in 1978 and signed by the then President Jimmy Carter. The Act stipulates the procedures to be followed when obtaining intelligence from foreign powers and agents of foreign powers both physically and electronically. The Act has been amended severally. In 2001, it was amended to involve groups and terrorist organizations not supported by foreign governments in an Act called the USA PATRIOT Act. A further amendment was done in 2007 to overhaul most of the provisions, in the Act called Protect America Act. A final amendment was done in 2008 called the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 (Boykoff 2006).…

    • 1756 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 2001, people are quick to dismiss the idea of an internment of American citizens, suggesting that the country has come a long way from 1942. The hypothesis that the government might conduct surveillance or use illegal wiretaps to monitor groups or individuals that it suspects of domestic terrorism seemed foreign before September 11th, and now has become a way to gain more information about potential suspects. These new measures, included in the USA Patriot Act, delicately trace the line between national security and civil liberties. A brief look at how the Bush…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Developed “to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes” the USA Patriot Act, bears the formal name ‘‘Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA Patriot Act, 2001, p. 1). Heretofore referred to as the “Patriot Act” the USA Patriot Act was signed into law within 6 weeks from initial draft to final approval supporting the enforcement of laws for the ultimate protection of the United States and her citizens by granting access to persons and information with liberal criminal and civil procedure exceptions. The Patriot Act immediately granted broad-based interrogation, surveillance and isolation abilities to law enforcement when investigating “crimes against terror” (US Government, 2011)…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages

    No, in any case it's a disturbing and terrible method for completing an awful and noxious act against pure individuals. One local may punch another, and not present a show of war. War is generally acknowledged to be a declared threats between two nations, as when the United States reported the war against the Axis powers Japan, Germany and Italy on December 8, 1941.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 3614 Words
    • 15 Pages

    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."- Benjamin Franklin…

    • 3614 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001 saw the largest loss of life of US civilians, in the US, from an outside enemy. As a result of the attacks, President Bush declared a “Global War on Terror.” To prevent another terror attack, Congress felt it must provide additional powers to US law enforcement and intelligence agencies. In 2001, Congress passed the United and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept or Obstruct Terrorism Acts of 2001, or colloquially referred to as the PATRIOT Act. While many will argue the PATRIOT Act is helpful in combating terrorism, critics argue it infringes on the 4th Amendment rights of US citizens.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    9/11 Cons

    • 2334 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Congress passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) in 1978 which prohibited electronic surveillance in the United States without proper warrants. The National Security Agency (NSA) wiretapping program contradicts this by allowing the NSA to conduct electronic surveillance without a warrant (“NSA”). Prior to the War on Terror, the government was allowed to secretly wiretap Americans and access their electronics with a judge's order due to FISA. After the attacks of September 11th, Congress allowed wiretapping without a specific judge's orders or even probable cause. Due to the Patriot Act, an act as a result from 9/11, the FBI could demand information from phone companies, internet service providers, banks, and even the U.S. Postal service without any court order as well (“Costs”). The Patriot Act is still to this day one of the most controversial acts in American history. This act is constantly criticized and makes people feel as if their freedom has been violated. People also feel as if it is very unnecessary because the only person that has ever been arrested due to this act was a taxi driver who tried to donate money to al-Qaeda…

    • 2334 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I chose to focus my analysis on Edward Snowden and his disclosure of classified domestic surveillance documents. When the leak first came out, I was upset at the thought of my privacy being violated by the NSA. However, the feeling dissipated when I considered the protection making that sacrifice affords. The NSA, like many organizations, are sometimes faced with ethical dilemmas. Occasionally, there is no right answer. Thus, the decision made, while not ideal, is the lesser of evils. In his TED talk interview, Snowden stated, “Your rights matter because you never know when you're going to need them” (TED, 13:20). While I admit his statement did trigger the reexamination of my stance, I arrived at the same position. Perhaps, I will look back…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The thoughts of those looking into the affairs of the NSA think the government took a great idea, and honestly the only idea with today’s technological warfare, and got greedy with how much information they have collected and need to be watched very carefully. The most important information for any human being is the information we choose to keep private, it can be the most devastating information in the wrong hands and the United States Government is holding that exact information in bulk, with your name on a yellow folder.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There has been significantly less terrorist activity in America since domestic surveillance has started, but how much does that prove? Evidence has been found that often the NSA has information on terrorist plots and disregards it without a thought, such as in the case of the Boston Marathon bombing and on Charlie Hebdo in Paris (“Domestic Surveillance” 4). The NSA is a little kid, spying around a corner and never uttering a word.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA Pros And Cons

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However the U. S. Constitution contains no actual right to privacy. The constitution only protects certain aspects of the individual.In the constitution certain amendments state only some things to be private not all. Some examples being, officials not being able to search your home without probable cause and no government involvement in making personal decisions. There is no actual right to overall privacy so the NSA has a right to go through different forms of communications in order to keep the people…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patriot Act Pros And Cons

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Following the attacks on September 11th, the Bush Administration enacted the Patriot Act, largely expanding the governments reach in national security. The Department of Justice’s first responsibility is to prevent future terrorist attacks on U.S. soil. Since the attacks on September 11th, the Patriot Act has played a tremendous role in our government, often being the leading role in successful operations to protect innocent civilians from the plans of terrorists. Basically the Congress took laws that were already laws and modified them into the Patriot Act to make them stronger, preserve lives of Americans. The U.S. Patriot Act stands for “Uniting and Strengthen America by Providing Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The primary concern of this paper is to establish the impact of the USA Patriot Act on local law enforcement and its potential for net widening. This paper will cover three primary areas to provide a proper public safety case analysis. First the paper will describe the public safety agency and its roles in relation to the USA PATRIOT ACT. Then the paper will provide a detail explanation of the leadership, management, and administration roles of the public safety agency chosen. Finally this paper will cover the importance of efficient administration in public safety.…

    • 2309 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays