Preview

Fab Flowers

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
774 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fab Flowers
Critical legal Thinking Project No. 2
I. Describe the legal relationship between Fab Flowers and Ben and explain any specific legal duties and liabilities of Fab Flowers and Ben in this relationship.
Fab Flowers and Ben formed an agency by agreement, whether oral or written, when Fab Flowers agreed with Ben to represent the partnership in purchasing wholesale flowers in Ecuador. On the two parties’ relationship, Fab Flower is the principal because they are employing Ben (the agent) to act on their behalf to purchase flowers for them in Ecuador to be resale.
Fab Flowers (Principal) duties to Ben * Compensation- Fab Flowers has a duty to pay Ben in a timely manner, either after the completion of the job or a specified agreed time. * Reimbursement and Indemnification- Any expenses that Ben incurred on behalf of Fab flowers in purchasing are reimbursable. In addition, the book also stated that subject to terms they agreed, Fab flowers have the duty to indemnify Ben for liabilities acquired because of authorized and lawful act transactions. * Cooperation- Fab Flowers has the duty to cooperate with Ben to assist him to perform his duties. * Fab Flowers maybe liable to any harm on property or person if they authorize Ben (agent) to commit a tort.
II. One day while delivering flowers in the partnership delivery truck, Fran negligently ran a stop sign, striking a car driven by Peggy, causing damage to the car and injury to Peggy. A. Explain
(1) the personal liability of Fran, Joe, and Mike to Peggy;
By negligently running a stop sign and striking Peggy’s car, which caused damages and injury, Fran, Joe and Mike can be sued by Peggy either all together, or separately. If Peggy decides to sue all three of them, they will be held joint and several liable. Even though, Joe and Mike did not participate or cause any direct damages to Peggy, she can go after their separates assets but only after exhausting the partnership’s asset. However, after



References: Business Law: Text and Cases. Kenneth Clarkson, Roger Miller, and Frank Cross.12th ed.Mason, OH: South-Western, 2012.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kuehn V. Pub Zone Summary

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    PL sues D in negligence for damages from injuries suffered caused by the D’s failure of meeting the duty of exercising reasonable care to protect PL, a business patron.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pa201 Unit 3 Assignment

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Conclusion: It is not likely that Samantha will be awarded damages for her injuries because she cannot show proof that the grocery store had any knowledge of the hazardous spill on the…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In either alternative, there is no question that since Florabama is classified as a variable interest entity, it needs to be assessed whether Meyer or Saban is the VIE’s primary beneficiary according to ASC 810-10-25-38A. As defined in ASC 810-10-15, the primary beneficiary is an entity that consolidates the variable interest entity.…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3. Q: A Ltd. owns 75 percent of B Co. Recently a receiver, acting on behalf of…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    July at the Multiplex

    • 3341 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The analysis for liability of fraud will explain in detail the offer, acceptance, and possible misrepresentation involved in the contract between Tommy and the Royal 16 Theater. The analysis will also cover the Cao and Cao v. Nguyen and Pham case and draw conclusions based on the prima facie case. Assuming that a…

    • 3341 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Defense Case Study

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The City of Albany decided to upgrade a fleet of repair trucks in order to respond to pothole fixing. ACME manufactured a cab and chassis of a truck that was then sold to Keefer Motors. Keefer Motors sold the truck unchanged to the City of Albany. No discussion by ACME or Keefer Motors had taken place with the City as to what the city would do with the truck. Susan’s Truck Equipment was contracted by the city to add a dump bed and hoist and the truck was modified and redelivered to the City of Albany; the truck was accepted and put into immediate use. Sarah and Emma are city employees and Sarah was injured when Emma backed up the pothole truck over her. Sarah was seriously injured and is suing ACME, Keefer Motors and Susan’s Truck Equipment, arguing that the truck was defective and unreasonably dangerous because the defendants did not advise the City of Albany to install a back-up alarm and they failed to install a back-up alarm.…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    You Decide, Week 5

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Jimmy’s mother, John, and Jimmy’s Poor-Man’s Bar sued Software Inc. for the damage caused by Coleman. Coleman sued Software Inc. for wrongful termination and the jewelry store sued Software Inc. for the value of the ring.…

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the world evolves through time, the business industry keeps on developing, indicating a fast growth rate of the numbers of merchants around the globe. Each seller will try to sell their goods and services more than their rivals and this merely shows that the current competition is extensive. Since sellers are eager to sell their goods and services, the buyer is often mislead and trapped into business dealings which the buyer’s have had to regret in the end. In order to succeed in their business dealings, the seller, in many situations, tend to withhold important information regarding the good or service they are selling. ‘Consider an injury caused by a product. A person consumes contaminated ginger beer. A child’s toy snaps and injures the child. The brakes in a car fail.’[1]…

    • 3375 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Exam 2 Geology

    • 2092 Words
    • 9 Pages

    1. Steven, who is Bertha 's guardian, convinces her to buy a certain parcel of land from Christy at a greatly inflated price. Steven may be liable for…

    • 2092 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    You Decide

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Susie, Jerry and Katie drove around for about a half an hour without taking Susie home. Jerry made one stop which was located down the street where Susie lived, but Susie never got off on the first stop. At some point, Jerry lost control of the vehicle while making a left turn resulting in the truck turning over and seriously injuring Susie. After the incident Susie filed a complaint against the City of Elsewhere, Officer Ruthless, and other defendants, alleging that the City and the Police were negligent and therefore liable for her injuries. The main issue is to prove if the City and Officer Ruthless are liable for Susie’s injuries, due to the simple fact that Officer Ruthless ordered Susie Marks to ride in Jerry’s camper because of the park curfew time.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First case: Henry runs the red light and, as a result, collides with Mary's car which is proceeding lawfully through the intersection, injuring Mary. Henry's negligence is both the actual and proximate cause of Mary's injury.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    plaintiff Bourque's injuries resulted from negligence of defendant Duplechin; Bourque was not guilty of contributory negligence and did not asuume the risk of this particular accident; and defendant Allstate did not prove that coverage was excluded under the terms of its policy.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What do you think about this situation? Should parties to a sales contract be able to rescind a contract because of mutual mistake of fact? Why or why not? Did either party act unethically in this case? Why or why not? What application does the UCC have here? Finally, in the overall context of contract law, are there any winners or losers when a contract is rescinded based on mutual mistake of fact? Why or why not?…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Small Business

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Anderson, R.A., Fox, 1., Twomey, D.P., and Jennings, M.M., (1999). Business Law & The Legal…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Book Ccna Study Notes

    • 6285 Words
    • 26 Pages

    You should not try to use this document as a cheat to be memorised or learnt by rote in…

    • 6285 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays