Preview

Faith In The Brain Newberg Argument

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
261 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Faith In The Brain Newberg Argument
The authors purpose in writing the article "Faith in the Brain," was to make his claim clear. In this article the claim is, "Its up to the people to decide if God is real based on their beliefs and religion." The author states in paragraph 45, "Both men believe the answers might lie somewhere between faith ans science. After all his years of scientific research, Newberg is still unsure about the proof of God's existence." This quote shows the authors purpose for writing, "Faith in the Brain." The authors purpose is to suggest the claim that its up to the people to decide if god is real based on their beliefs and religion. The next quote which proves this claim is in paragraph 46 when the author states, "I think if anything I still have the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Article is based on facts and applied research. Im not a scientist so I cant agree or disagree. However I do find it baffling that there is so much study of the brain that goes unseen. Its unbelieved to think how many hours, days, months researchers put in time to find or come up with different ways to uncover the brain. I think I…

    • 515 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The paper written by McCloskey is nothing more than an Atheists attempt to justify his atheistic ideas and at no time should ever be taken by any other person as anything more than one man’s opinions which are based completely upon speculative ideas. Throughout this paper, I read statements like, “theists feel…”,” Most theists believe…”, “They do not think…”, and “Most theists conclude…”; however, the person giving these tidbits is only one person, as opposed to the “most” which he seems to speak for, and he is no more a “theist”, than the “man in the moon”. I would be more inclined to over look his made-up statistics, had a single one of his claims lined up with my theistic ideas; however, every time he claimed to know how the “theists” think or feel, it turned out to be the opposite of my theistic point of view. The very basis for this fallacy can be tied to a statement in McCloskey’s opening sentence: “…the grounds upon which theists base their belief in God…” In this statement, McCloskey claims to know why theists believe in God. My next claim is pure speculation; however, if I were to ask every person in my church congregation, “why do you believe in God”, I seriously doubt anyone would respond with the cosmological argument or the teleological argument.…

    • 2632 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe in the bible, and prayers. Science can answer lots of things yes, but science cannot answer what happens to the spirit after one dies, or anything in regards to religion. They are two different realms. Science is fact based, religion is faith and opinionated based. Reading his argument seems a lot like Russel’s in a way It is hard to relate to the argument since it strictly uses science as the argument.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Argumentative Essay on “The Ethics of Belief” PHIL 2641 Online – Section 001 February 13, 2008…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This essay is mostly defending the rationality of religious faith with evidence of religious truth lacking. In section X William James says, “In truths dependent on our personal action, then, faith based on desire is certainly a lawful and possibly an indispensable thing.” William James defends that religious beliefs depend on ones personal actions and can also be justified through ones faith based on desire. He states that the evidence of religion ultimately depends on our belief. James concludes that whether we choose to believe or not we decide our own…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Does faith have a legitimate link to science and the methods by which we gain knowledge and understanding? Some would be quick to reply that just as our government has placed a dividing line between churches and state that science and the Bible do not mix. But from a Christian perspective how can we say the same when we understand the foundation of all truth comes from God. In Colossians 1:16 in the Amplified Bible it reads: “For it was in Him that all things were created, in heaven and on earth, things seen and things unseen, whether thrones, dominions, rulers, or authorities; all things were created and exist through Him [by His service, intervention] and in and for Him” (Bible Gateway, 2012). In Revelations 4:11 it reads, “Worthy are You, our Lord and God, to receive the glory and the honor and dominion, for You created all things; by Your will they were [brought into being] and were created” (2012). If God is the created of all things, and science its methods and how we obtain knowledge and learn are a function of God’s work in us, how can we say the two are separate entities unto themselves. Really we cannot. This Paper will examine these very facts and methods as they pertain to man and God and what the correlation is between Science, faith, man and God.…

    • 2295 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Does Clifford present a persuasive viewpoint of religious faith? In his article “The Ethics of Belief (Clifford, 1877) W.K. Clifford sought to claim that it is inappropriate always, in all places, and for anyone, to believe anything upon unsatisfactory evidence. The goal of this paper is to determine whether indeed this opinion offered by Clifford, when considering religious faith, is persuasive. To successfully do this, I will weigh up the arguments that Clifford put forward, including that of disbelieving anything based upon scarce evidence, it always does damage and therefore is wrong. Such an assertion is in direct conflict to those pious believers who consider their blind faith as a goodness and for whom proof is something that is needless…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reviewing McCloskey's article it is clear to say that he wanted to truly appeal to an atheist audience. McCloskey refers to the arguments as "proofs", which means that he is trying to insinuate that these arguments are not scientifically proven and are not based on facts. A proof is a statement that is unquestionable and lead to an end. He also implies that the arguments cannot definitely establish the case for God, so therefore they should be abandoned because this way he can use that term to make the argument that God exists less plausible. Specifically, the cosmological argument, teleological argument, and arguments of design in general cannot be proven and cannot point to an end, but they do provide possible arguments that God does…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In February of 1968, H. J. McCloskey’s published an article called, “On Being an Atheist.” In this, he argues that atheism is a more comfortable, logical and realistic than theism. He mentions the evil that is in the world and how it doesn’t make any sense to find comfort in a God that purposely causes pain, disease and natural disasters. McCloskey also mentions it is unreasonable to live by faith in this world. In this article, he argues the three theistic proofs including, the argument for design, the teleological argument and the cosmological argument.…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Einstein Vs Phyllis

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When they tie in facts, or even religious views that provide emotions, to back up what they discover, it provides them a feeling of fulfilment. Scientists differ on whether they credit these feelings to faith or facts. “The pursuit of science leads to a religious feeling which is different for scientists than the religiosity of someone more naive.” Many scientists believe they don’t have faith because they have studied science and discovered the meaning behind things in a more technical way.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The arguments he stated has successfully convinced me that there is in fact a God, the arguments put forth establishes specific truths….. Namely that whatever we think of and see as truth is in fact so because God exists and everything in us is because of him.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Response Paper

    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1968, a article was published by a man named H.J. McCloskey called “On Being an Atheist”, in which an attempt to present arguments against the existence of God is made. In his work, McCloskey attempts to provide readers with the argument that atheism is more “reasonable and comfortable (McCloskey,1968)” compared to the alternative theistic view. In his article, McCloskey attempts to make arguments against the three typical theistic proofs of God which includes the cosmological and teleological arguments, along with the argument from design. McCloskey uses the existence of evil and the irrationalness off faith against the theistic view of God. At the beginning of the article it seems that an intriguing argument will be made regarding the theistic view point of God, yet as McCloskey continues the argument becomes more biased in attacking spiritual beliefs which questions his validity.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In fact McCloskey places the bar even lower by referring to the “proofs of” rather than “arguments for” God’s existence, thereby overstating the Theist’s claim. With respect to the “proofs” for God’s existence that McCloskey attempts to deal with, namely the Cosmological and Teleological Arguments, McCloskey offers trivial objections that are easily answered. With respect to arguments for God’s non-existence, McCloskey offers the logical form of the problem of evil which, while rich in rhetoric, does not contain enough logic to necessitate its title. McCloskey ends his article with a pragmatic justification of Atheist, stating that Atheism is more comforting that Theism; a point that is stark in its irrelevance.…

    • 2161 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Christian Psychology

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Our faith as Christians can make us better psychologist because Christians look towards the word of God for guidance and wisdom. Christians can take God’s word for truth, they do not need to observe, formulate a hypothesis, test theory, draw conclusion and then evaluate how the earth was created. The bible says God created the universe, it is by faith that Christians believe God spoke and it was good. Christians do not need to follow the steps of the scientific method to believe, it is by faith itself that proves that what is unseen is real. Proverbs 3:5-6 says, “Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding; in all your ways acknowledge Him, and He shall direct your paths.” Christians do not want to overshadow the cross with psychological terminology which can contaminate the Word of God. Christians are led by the Holy Spirit and seek the bible that contains the only pure truth of God.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On Being an Atheist

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages

    McCloskey makes the claim that he is reminding fellow atheist why they believe there is no God. He claims that the traditional proofs have no merit. I believe the sheer magnitude and complexity of the world we live in is strong evidence of an intelligent designer and creator. Only an intelligent creator could form a world where the air that we breathe is part of such a complex system. We also live in a world that has morals, which points to a morally perfect Being that we model our lives and society by. The Cosmological, Teleological and Moral arguments create a cumulative case for why God exist. God’s existence is not solely dependent on any one argument, rather an accumulation of several arguments. Although McCloskey tries to argue the Cosmological, Teleological and Moral arguments from the same point, they are intended to build upon each other.…

    • 1378 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics