Preview

Famine Affluence And Morality Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
925 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Famine Affluence And Morality Analysis
Running Head: Famine, Affluence and Morality 1

Famine, Affluence and Morality

Wendy Merrill

PHI208

Alexandrea Ravenelle

March 25, 2013

Morality …show more content…
An event can also have morality, because it can be either seen as

something that is wrong or something that is right. And lastly a person can either be and do

good things or even bad things and can either be praised for what they did or didn 't do and can

also be blamed for what they did or didn 't do.

The goal that Peter Singer is trying to convey in his article is that he is trying to convince people that that if famine is so bad(which most will not argue) in a poor country or community then people are morally obligated to do something about it and to either stop it from happening or to prevent it from happening. Singer says “if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance we ought, morally, to do it.”(Singer, 1971) So by him saying this it means that there could be some flaws in the way people will act and think about helping others. People have always been known to help another person or a charity or organization if it is something they can see, feel or touch. Something that is within close proximity to them.

Morality
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Famine Affluence And Morality Summary
    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Famine Affluence And Morality Summary

    In the article, Peter Singer’s purpose is to draw attention and bring apprehension to the fashion the world’s people are being tormented directly to natural disasters and poverty. He also analyzes the amount of people struggling to survive in account to living under the poverty line, a few on a single dollar a day. Singer constructs the point that we need to be doing a greater job at helping those not in the status of being able to help themselves. By using Bengal as an example of how the countries that are rich respond to a disaster, Singer is capable of proving his point (Singer, 1972).…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary: Do Individual Australians Have To The World's Poorest Populations
    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Summary: Do Individual Australians Have To The World's Poorest Populations

    Nobody can say that they wouldn’t help someone who is close to them; well I hope so otherwise I really need to rethink my faith in humanity; I wouldn’t go and say that every single person in the world would jump into a lake to save someone but they would try their hardest to save someone in trouble. But like the analogy that Singer uses in his essay we are more likely to give money to charities that are helping people in our own country rather than some random people halfway across the world. That’s probably because we can actually see the effect of our donations and the disasters that the people have to face. Guilt consumes us until we give into the pressures of donating, whereas if we see an ad for a charity that is helping people in third world countries we have less of an emotional connection to them because it has no effect on our lives. Peter Singer states “Moral attitudes are shaped by the needs of society, no doubt society needs people who will observe the rules that make social existence tolerable…It is quite inessential, however to, help people outside one’s own society”(Singer, pg. 469).…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment
    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment

    The primary objective of Singer’s post is to convey that we the folks have the capacity to assist men and women in need that is less lucky since it's our moral duty to do so. He uses the disaster in East Bengal for example. As per Singer, P. (1972), “Continuous poverty, a cyclone, and a civil war have turned a minimum of 9 million people into abandoned refugees; nonetheless, it's not beyond the capability of the wealthier countries to provide sufficient help to decrease further suffering to very small proportions” (pg. 229). He thinks that there's no reason at all for folks to suffer if other people have the capability to avoid it from happening. It’s our moral responsibility to…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer's Article 'Famine, Affluence And Morality'
    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Peter Singer's Article 'Famine, Affluence And Morality'

    In his article, “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, philosopher Peter Singer observes that that there are millions of people around the world who are leading misery lives and suffering death, because of famine , war, lack of shelter, and adequate medical care. He states that although rich nations have contributed great sums of money for these causes, they are still not giving enough in comparison to their Gross National Product (GNP). He points out that many nations only contributes about one percent of their GNP.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer Famine Affluence And Morality Analysis
    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Peter Singer Famine Affluence And Morality Analysis

    The issue of moral obligations towards the global poor has always been a contentious affair to be discussed for fear of problematic resolutions that may affect academia on a personal level. Peter Singer, most notable for his authorship of “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” and the drowning child analogy, presents the rather uncommon normative view that affluent persons are morally obligated to donate more resources to humanitarian causes than the present standard. Singer’s perspective on these seemingly radical moral ideals are confronted by many a pragmatic objection, ranging from entitlement principles to moral inequalities. Nevertheless, Singer builds his argumentative framework in regards to moral obligations to the global poor on solid…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Surviving Famine: The Kantian Dilemma
    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Surviving Famine: The Kantian Dilemma

    Say your family and you are struggling to meet your basic needs such as food during a harsh famine. Your basic instinct is to acquire food by any means necessary. One way you could get food is by stealing it from your neighbor. In this essay I will examine whether this issue is morally right. I will argue that by using Kant’s End in itself theory, stealing food from your neighbor in time of famine is morally wrong.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Singer's Slippery Slope Argument
    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Singer's Slippery Slope Argument

    Singer claims that by donating to aid agencies or charity organisations, who will in turn pass it on to the needy in other poorer parts of the world that desperately need these resources, we can help prevent the suffering and death that comes unnecessarily if not for that fact that they had the basic necessities that we can offer help with, and this is true on the basis that we could, as an affluent society, comfortably do since many of us need not an extra piece of clothing or car that can be considered indulgences, and it could have been better used as donations to help those suffering. While it sounds logical that the able should help the needy especially if it is not too bothersome to do so, Singer might not have considered the reality that exists in aid agencies and their practices, whereby even with the best intentions, the donations might not truly be delivered to the recipient, leading to the idea that his premise might not be as sufficiently thought out, perhaps due to the time when it was written, which was a time before there was an increase in awareness of corruption in regards to global aid to the needy, and this does not support his premise, that people would be saved if we were all obligated to do so as realistically speaking, we cannot guarantee it. Singer is right to claim that donation equals aid and decreased suffering and that aid agencies is one good way to help the needy directly, but it is difficult to fully conclude this would, together with the other premises, help prevent suffering and death as it is difficult to completely prevent an issue that is prevalent in many third world countries, aside from East Bengal, the main focus of his argument, as it is multi-faceted and complex in nature. The fact that the people living within these countries are unable to fend for themselves might not fully be due to merely external events such as wars and natural disasters, as part…

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Dbq Poverty Analysis
    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Dbq Poverty Analysis

    Today, poverty is prevalent throughout the world with 80% of humanity living on less than $10 a day. However, this isn’t the first time poverty is seen so frequently in society. During the Renaissance, approximately 50% of Europe’s population lived at a subsistence level with 80% of Europeans facing possible starvation in times of peril. In the midst of this time period, as poverty ran rampant it led to differing attitudes towards helping the poor as well as the concept of poverty. Poverty was viewed by the upper class as well as humanists as a negative influence to society due to characteristics like idleness which was thought to be the beginning of all evils. Meanwhile, religious officials like the clergy as well as artists thought that the poor should be assisted for spiritual benefits and believed that aiding the poor was only…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer Is Wrong
    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Peter Singer Is Wrong

    I believe that we are morally free to live the life we want and pursue our own interests, at least to some extent, and this entails that we are morally permitted to dedicate our energy, time, and capital to activates that don’t involve any direct impact on famine relief or similar causes.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer
    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Peter Singer

    It is an irrefutable fact that we should help each other. However sometimes help to others poses some danger to either us or others. In Peter Singer's essay "Famine Affluence, and Morality" Peter Singer argues that we ought, morally, to prevent starvation due to famine. Singer begins by saying that assistance has been inadequate as richer countries prioritize development above preventing starvation. Singer then states that "suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad" (404) and assumes that it is uncontroversial enough to be accepted without justification. He then next raises the linked premise that we morally ought to prevent something 'bad' from happening as long as we have the means and it does not entail compromising on anything of 'comparable moral significance', using the analogy of a drowning child and hence assuming the principle _of "_universalizability" (405). As Singer writes, he attempts to justify why he feels that it is within our means to do so without sacrificing anything morally significant, and concludes that we hence morally ought to prevent starvation due to famine.…

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Singer Solution To World Poverty Summary
    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Singer Solution To World Poverty Summary

    In the article "The Singer Solution to World Poverty" Peter Singer talks about whether we should save poor children or not by donating money. In his article, Singer helps us realize our response for the deaths of children in poor families by asking the reader to consider hypothetical situations and put these moral issues into real life. In the long run, simply donating money to poor countries do not solve the problem. In my opinion, we should help the poor children to make their own living, by spending…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Health Car Act
    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Health Car Act

    Singer also had counter arguments that he presented in his article. He claims that if everyone donated just a little, what they should, then everyone would only need to donate a small amount. Therefore, there would be no reason for one to donate more than another. So, Singer responds stating that it is not true that everyone donates what they should so this would be irrelevant. Another counter argument is since there aren 't many people donating and those who do donate, should just keep giving until they are almost as poor as those they are helping. Well. this just does not seem fair! And it 's not becuase this would result in them donating too much. Singer also points out that this would only happen if they did not know what others were donating but they may act as if they are all donating the same. Singer also says that we…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Famine, Affluence, Morality
    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Famine, Affluence, Morality

    Based on the article by Peter Singer entitled Famine, Affluence, and Morality, he attempts to move us to do more for charities and gives one astounding example. He uses starving children in Bengali and a drowning child.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    International Business
    • 2361 Words
    • 10 Pages

    International Business

    * An action can be illegal but morally right, and legal but morally wrong. Legality is based on laws, regulations, etc. Morality concerns…

    • 2361 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    A Short Essay About Killing
    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A Short Essay About Killing

    Morality, the most common definition of the word is the concept of doing the right thing. To define morality, It’s important to also define ’’ what is right and what is wrong? ’’. In my view, there is no definition of right and wrong, because of the fact that the most common definitions of the terms are simply just based on the emotions and decisions made by the human being. In this point of view, the definition of morality would be the concept of doing a thing that could be considered ’‘ right ’’. But in the perspective of a ’’ successful ’’ society, which fundamental brick stone is one of the human most vital desires; surviving, morality is necessary.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics