Preview

Summary: Do Individual Australians Have To The World's Poorest Populations

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1211 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Summary: Do Individual Australians Have To The World's Poorest Populations
The question that was posed for this essay was “What moral obligations do individual Australians have to the world’s poorest population?” However I want to change this from just individual Australians and make it “What moral obligations do individuals across the world have to the poorest populations?” My reason for this is because it is well-known that Australia is very multi-cultured so why focus on one country with so much diversity when we can focus on the entire world which has just the same amount of diversity. With diversity comes a lot of different beliefs and religions and because most of our morals are based on the religion that we follow there can never be one definite answer. As the philosopher Louis P. Pojman states in his book, …show more content…
Nobody can say that they wouldn’t help someone who is close to them; well I hope so otherwise I really need to rethink my faith in humanity; I wouldn’t go and say that every single person in the world would jump into a lake to save someone but they would try their hardest to save someone in trouble. But like the analogy that Singer uses in his essay we are more likely to give money to charities that are helping people in our own country rather than some random people halfway across the world. That’s probably because we can actually see the effect of our donations and the disasters that the people have to face. Guilt consumes us until we give into the pressures of donating, whereas if we see an ad for a charity that is helping people in third world countries we have less of an emotional connection to them because it has no effect on our lives. Peter Singer states “Moral attitudes are shaped by the needs of society, no doubt society needs people who will observe the rules that make social existence tolerable…It is quite inessential, however to, help people outside one’s own society”(Singer, pg. 469). For example some disasters that are affecting countries at the moment and where the citizens would be more likely to be donating are: Australia the farmers have been are affected by drought and cannot make and food and France which was attacked by ISIS. These are just some problems that countries who could afford to donate are having to deal with so therefore people would be more inclined to help them before helping people in poverty in India or Kenya. I’m not saying that places like India and Kenya don’t need our help but how do people expect to help others when

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Any time a person gives to a charitable organization they assume the money will go where it 's promised. Sadly things do not always work out that way. We tend to feel good when we donate to charities; it gives us that warm fuzzy feeling. The complete opposite happens when we find we got screwed and our hard earned money went into the paychecks of business people. When Americans give to someone…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The primary objective of Singer’s post is to convey that we the folks have the capacity to assist men and women in need that is less lucky since it's our moral duty to do so. He uses the disaster in East Bengal for example. As per Singer, P. (1972), “Continuous poverty, a cyclone, and a civil war have turned a minimum of 9 million people into abandoned refugees; nonetheless, it's not beyond the capability of the wealthier countries to provide sufficient help to decrease further suffering to very small proportions” (pg. 229). He thinks that there's no reason at all for folks to suffer if other people have the capability to avoid it from happening. It’s our moral responsibility to…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    If they donate, they can lead a ‘morally decent life’ (according to Singer). What would happen if everyone were to donate their spending money, rather than to buy new clothes or electronics? Singer fails to look at the other side of the story. Say everyone was to stop spending. Our economy would most likely suffer (more than it is currently). Stores would go out of business if everyone stopped upgrading their electronics and buying new clothes. Is it justifiable to compromise our economy to save children in third world countries? Singer needs to get off his high horse. He thinks his way is the only way, when there are many ways to donate and help others.…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There seems to be an inexhaustible number of reasons that one person might go out of his way to assist another. One of the more interesting of these is to give to soothe one's conscience, or to avoid the guilt that comes with not offering help when you can. Ma Joad used this reason to feed the starving children at the first Hooverville they stayed at. She looked at those kids and tried to avoid giving them food so she could feed her family. Even Uncle Tom had a hard time eating his food with those hungry children looking on. Ma eventually soothed her conscience by giving the kids the dregs of the soup kettle, though she knew she should have given the entire helping to her family, as they had less than enough themselves.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Singer claims that by donating to aid agencies or charity organisations, who will in turn pass it on to the needy in other poorer parts of the world that desperately need these resources, we can help prevent the suffering and death that comes unnecessarily if not for that fact that they had the basic necessities that we can offer help with, and this is true on the basis that we could, as an affluent society, comfortably do since many of us need not an extra piece of clothing or car that can be considered indulgences, and it could have been better used as donations to help those suffering. While it sounds logical that the able should help the needy especially if it is not too bothersome to do so, Singer might not have considered the reality that exists in aid agencies and their practices, whereby even with the best intentions, the donations might not truly be delivered to the recipient, leading to the idea that his premise might not be as sufficiently thought out, perhaps due to the time when it was written, which was a time before there was an increase in awareness of corruption in regards to global aid to the needy, and this does not support his premise, that people would be saved if we were all obligated to do so as realistically speaking, we cannot guarantee it. Singer is right to claim that donation equals aid and decreased suffering and that aid agencies is one good way to help the needy directly, but it is difficult to fully conclude this would, together with the other premises, help prevent suffering and death as it is difficult to completely prevent an issue that is prevalent in many third world countries, aside from East Bengal, the main focus of his argument, as it is multi-faceted and complex in nature. The fact that the people living within these countries are unable to fend for themselves might not fully be due to merely external events such as wars and natural disasters, as part…

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Singer anticipates objections and the first of which is that as the drowning child is nearer to us than the starving Bengali, the moral obligation is therefore seemingly reduced. Singer responds that this merely affects the likelihood of who receives aid first, but it still holds that we should be indiscriminate with the amount of help given to people especially when the world is becoming a "global village" (405). Singer also anticipates the objection that there are other people who are standing around not doing anything anyway. He contends that there is a psychological difference but the moral implications are still the same as it is absurd to be less obliged to help the drowning child even if there were many others idling…

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I like many people believe that the people of wealthy nations have a moral responsibility to help poor nations. When I was doing some research on this subject, I learned some people have said that all people have a moral responsibility to help people in harm’s way and when doing so would not cause harm to them. And as a person I do know that suffering and death from starvation are both considered harmful things. I do also see that it is very clear that small financial sacrifices on the part of people from wealthy nations can prevent massive amounts of suffering and death from starvation just by helping in small ways. So from my point of view and research I do now believe that people in a wealthy nation have at least some moral responsibility to help poor nations. I also see that Singers argument does add up with my research so I do agree with Singers argument as well.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    However, religious believers themselves shouldn’t just be the only ones who should show more compassion. In order to help the poor, everyone in the world should help in different ways (e.g. donating to charity). God has given us free will, so it’s the religious believers’ choice if he or she wants to show more compassion to the poor or not. The religious believer may also be in a difficult position themselves where they are unable to contribute to helping the poor.…

    • 280 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Kiwanis International Club held a survey where they asked when is it important to help out others? 75% of people believe in helping others when it will have an important impact on not only their lives but on other people's lives. When asked what type of community service makes the biggest difference, ⅔ answered hands on activities such as donating supplies, volunteering with a local service club, or participating in local community events have a bigger influence than just giving out money (Most Americans Believe One Can Can Change the World). Today, because of the sacrifices and achievements of many strong leaders, others now have their independence from countries, they have the right to vote, improved working conditions, or just an opportunity to be a better person. According to the survey on volunteerism done by the Kiwanis International Club, 86% of Americans believe one person can make a change (“Most Americans Believe One Can Change the World”). If this many people believe that humans are capable of making a change in the world, then the only thing stopping us from improving the world is us. As a quote by an anonymous person states “If you’re searching for that one person who will change your life...take a look in the mirror”; humans are the future of the world, and to live prosperous lives, we should be willing to help improve not only our living conditions, but to not be selfish and lend a helping hand to others in need as well. What the world is molded into is because of us, and as John F. Kennedy once said, “Making a positive difference in our own life or the lives of others, organizations, and the world at large starts with a healthy mind, body, and spirit, and a change of daily thoughts, communications, and actions of our own self…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Overall, helping others is a virtue and we should help someone who is worthy of help. What's more, people live in harmony and construct a caring society together and I think our world will become better in the…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    3. Critically analyse the following quote from Sarah Wise (2011) “As Australians we promulgate the value of a fair go. Yet there are individuals and groups in our society that experience extreme and persistent disadvantage that sets them apart from the rest of our society”. (Reference: Wise, S. (2011) “Advance Australia Fairly” Sydney Morning Herald. January 14, 2011)…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The word poverty gets throw around in today society. But as Australians do we really know what poverty is any more? Poverty is the state of one who lacks a usual or socially acceptable amount of money or material possessions. Poverty is said to exist when people lack the means to satisfy their basic needs which include food, water and shelter.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer argues that all people have a moral obligation to donate all that we can to the poor. The suffering and starving of those people living in poverty are not inevitable; many of us have the ability to eliminate this suffering, however, we choose not to. We have a moral duty to prevent bad things from happening as long as it does not cost at the cost of “sacrificing anything morally significant”. (Ethical Theory). Therefore, making such donation is moral duty for people living in affluent countries.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    While many are drawn to charities because of morals and a sense of responsibility to help, and while that is a valuable desire, many do not consider the paternalistic aspects of their actions. The care for others never occurs between equals, inside American society it can be seen often in the care of the elderly, but also in how America interacts with other countries on an international scale. The paternalistic attributes could be minimalized though if in the process of giving, more agency was attributed to the recipients, unfortunately this is not the case in much of the foreign aid offered by…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you know that many people around the world are suffering due to lack of resources within their countries? Some wealthier people and nations decide not to help these less fortunate people as they would rather spend money on frivolous things and think that it’s not their obligation. I believe that man has a moral obligation to help those less fortunate than him, though I believe that it is not morally right to only help those who are less fortunate just to make you feel like a better person.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays