The reactionary right has the same concept of loyalty and devotion. Conflict only occurs when deciding who that loyalty and devotion should go to. The nationalist ideology can sometimes differ from nation to nation. An example of right-wing nationalism would be the present election. President Trump received much approval from the older, white male and working class, who makes up the right side nationalist movement (Hilsman, 2016). Trump’s supporters are similar to the actions of the right-wing nationalists of the past. Rightists defends nationalism by the three concepts of, “the political doctrine that the nation is the only legitimate basis for statehood; the political emotion of collective loyalty that might be attached to a nation, a race, a class, religion or even a political ideology; and the sense of nation identity, sometimes called patriotism” (Sullivan, …show more content…
Europe represents xenophobic violence, Latin America represents paramilitary violence, and North America represents militi-religious-supremacist violence. (p. 234). In the future, Europe and North America will most likely remain the same. There are no possibilities for an international revolutionary movement for the right side in the post war era (p. 235). In the future for Europe, right wing violence is likely going to remain the same. Europe has a huge population of right-wing youth that will continue to voice for the right side. Street-level hate crimes and terrorist cells will continue to occur. The United States will continue with violence from religious terrorist, militias, and racial supremacist groups; attacks will occasionally occur from these groups (p. 235). The youth in the United States on the right side does exist but the older generation generally has more of a voice. In Latin America, the political right will continue to be out of order and