Preview

Federalist Number 51 Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
609 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Federalist Number 51 Essay
The most intriguing element of the Constitution of the United States is the Independent Judiciary, in which judicial power for the country lies in the federal courts and operates separately from the legislative and executive branches. This institution allows for the civil settlement of conflicts and enables the fair application of the law to cases. Judicial independence ensures that federal judges aren’t punished for their decisions related to court cases and aren’t inhibited by political figures in their interpretation of the law. This tenet of the Constitution is the foundation for the generalized success and transparency of our standing judicial system and is why it has been the model for numerous systems across the globe. James Madison’s Federalist Number 51 is a fundamental interpretation of the concept of judicial independence delineated in the Constitution. In this document, Madison argues that judges should be free of political pressures from the other branches of government. Several arrangements within the Constitution were included under the provision of an Independent Judiciary. These include the appointment of federal …show more content…
Although anti-Federalists could have argued that this would enable states to exercise their own authority under the power of the federal government, the framers of the Constitution likely included the provision of an Independent Judiciary to ensure that courts were acting in a neutral and unbiased manner and were promoting the common good, rather than acting in their own interests. Without an independent judiciary, legislators and the executive could pressure judges into making a certain decision or punish them for their interpretation of the law. The framers likely saw this as a possible problem for the level of transparency that they were trying to achieve within their developing system of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Madison begins his paper stating that he believes that each branch of the government should be independent from one another. If possible the branches would have as little agency with one another as possible. He believed that members from the different branches of the government should not be able to appoint each other or decide on other salaries. If these rules were followed the people would be in more control of the government by picking the best representative in each branch of the government. Madison and the Framers realized that every position couldn’t be elective because of political pressures and certain needed qualifications, such as in the judicial…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Federalist No. 39 “The conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles,” is the thirty-ninth of The Federalist Papers and was published by James Madison on January 18, 1788. Madison defines what a Republican form of government is considered, which was what the nation was currently called. It also considers whether the nation is federal or national: a confederacy, or consolidation of states. At the current moment the nation was considered Federal and states were confederate, but they were leaning towards A National government. (federal vs. national government.) Madison then defines what republic means and states three rules which must comply to be considered a Republic:…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The evolution of Federalism in the United States was a gradual event that had definitions of federal government being given in federalist 46 and 28 which gave definitions of a federalist government to the United States. As stated by James Madison one of the architects of the federal kind of government, “the state and national governments are in fact but different agents and trustees of the people, constituted with different powers." The purpose of such a kind of government was to protect the rights of the people in all its earnestness.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    AP Government

    • 477 Words
    • 3 Pages

    7. In Federalist Paper No. 51, why does Madison think judges should NOT be elected?…

    • 477 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most important concerns of the argument presented by James Madison in The Federalist No. 41 & 45 is the possible misappropriation of power that the government has over the country. Madison stresses the importance of maintaining civil liberties and preventing the government from having too much power. The new government will be granted great influence over many aspects of life for the American citizen so there must be a system of checks and balances.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalist 47- In this paper, Madison is responding to the issue of having a federal government. He argues against the assumption that this new government will be allotted too much power and control America as an empire. In response, Madison writes that the U.S Constitution balances the government well by using the system of separation of powers among the executive, judiciary, and legislature. Madison also stated that these powers would blend and intertwine; however that would not affect the factor of separation of power. To support his argument, Madison referred to the writings of Montesquieu. According to Montesquieu, tyranny results when one branch of government concurrently holds the powers of another branch. However, Madison argues that Montesquieu "did not mean that these departments ought to have no partial agency in, or no control over, the acts of each other." He interprets this as a system that supports checks and balances. Overall, he responds by stating his views on separation of power and by stating checks and balances has been followed in individual state constitutions before, so it should be trusted now.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Oregon Judicial Selection

    • 2837 Words
    • 12 Pages

    As a member of this committee it has been an honor to explore some of the concerns revolving around the judicial selection process in this Great State of Oregon. Oregon’s above average voter participations is an example of just how important democracy is to the individuals of the state. The committee has been asked to examine the nonpartisan judicial election process and to determine whether or not the non-partisan judicial selection has become increasingly partisan and more polarized. Both of which have serious consequences if unchecked periodically. As was said By James Madison in his writing of The Federalist No. 51, “It is of great importance in a republic not only to guard…

    • 2837 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution gave the federal courts appeal jurisdiction not only in matters of law, but also in determining matters that would normally be decided by a jury in the lower state court. Through this appellate jurisdiction, the antifederalist worried that the federal courts would eliminate the need for verdicts from local juries and state court systems altogether. The antifederalists thought that the jurisdiction that the federal courts had was too much, and as federal power grew, which they believed was inevitable, more cases would be taken to federal courts rather than state courts, thus reducing the importance of the state courts. Another major concern of the antifederalist was the degree of judicial independence given to federal judges. The Constitution stated that judges could not be impeached.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Madison argues how checks and balances can not only advocate a separation of powers but also create an effective government. Madison writes to help his readers understand how a well structured government can lead to a successful country. One of his main arguments is that no branch should have too much power, therefore, different branches of government should exist. "Legislative, judiciary magistracies should be drawn from the same fountain of authority, the people, through canals having no communication whatever with one another." To assure greater independence, government is separated into the Legislative Branch, the House of the Representatives and the Senate. He states "Ambition must be made to counteract ambition." meaning the ambitions of legislators must be checked by the executive and judicial branch which is then checked by the ambitions of legislators and presidents. This separation of powers advocated the idea of compromise. Madison also asserts that the members of each branch should not be too dependent on the members of the other two branches. If a man is presented with too much power, it may rule over him. Madison states "If men were angels, no government would be necessary. " The government must control the people but control itself as well. While the will of the people is no doubt the primary control on the government, other controls are necessary.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalist 51

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Federalist 51 is written by James Madison in 1788. He wrote it to explain that any branch of government can become tyrannical if they accumulate too much power. He explains how checks and balances help to keep the branches separate. He talks about human nature how government is needed because people are fallen. Even within the checks and balances, the departments of people have rules to limit their individual power.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Constitution was first drafted it unknowingly started the creation of the Anti Federalists. The Anti Federalists were a group of people that did not want the Constitution because they believed it would bring a strong central government, which they absolutely did not like. Anti Federalist believed that a strong central government would bring tyranny and violate the citizen’s natural rights.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Constitutional Period, there were two groups of people; one group called the Federalists, wanted a stronger national government and one group called the Anti-Federalists, opposed the development of a national government. The Federalists ratified the Constitution to help properly manage the debt and tensions following the American Revolution. The Anti-Federalists opposed the development of a strong federal government and the ratification of the Constitution, preferring instead for power to remain in the hands of state and local governments. Although the Anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in the prevention of the adoption of the Constitution, their efforts were responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of Rights.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Anti-Federalists believe that the government should not have too much power over us as a nation, due to having no desire of a repeat of British Rule, which claimed absolute rights over us as citizens, rather wanting to have additional control over their daily lives, rather than have someone control it for them. While the Federalists wanted a strong government, the Anti-Federalists did not trust British Rule not to happen again. We are opponents of the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, we as Anti-Federalists have diverse factions, such as supporters like the Articles of Confederation supporters, or the opponents to the Constitution.? Confusing thesis…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The folk behind the Federalist movement included farmers on the frontier, businessmen near navigable water or involved in interstate trade, minorities whose rights were unprotected by the states, and slaveholders who realized the benefits of the Three Fifths Clause. Furthermore, many of the important faces of the American Revolution, including George Washington and Ben Franklin, were Federalists and helped sway a public that held them up to be godly figures of early republic. Madison’s anonymous papers such as Federalist 10 helped the party to dominate a Federalist-friendly press and have their ideas spread throughout the country. In Federalist 10, Madison turns a what Antifederalists view as negative aspect of the Constitution, a consolidated government over an immense land, and turns it into a remarkable bonus that avoids any faction getting an upper hand. Madison considers that men of a majority will oppress the minority if “the impulse and opportunity coincide” and that “neither moral nor religious motives can be relied on as an adequate control” to these urges. Therefore, a government that is divided up into many factions can have no one ruling majority and in turn, no group will predominantly sway to oppress a minority. Madison then continues on to say how a “pure democracy” of a small number of citizens can “admit of no cure for the mischiefs of faction” because on such a small scale, nearly everyone, besides the minority, will belong to the same faction and in turn, the majority. To combat the problems of a strong majority, Madison argues that the elected officials will “discern the true interest of their country” and will avoid the temptation to succumb to the needs of “temporary or partial considerations.” Madison worked to find a balance in the number of representatives…

    • 1803 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays