Preview

Fiedler Contingency Model

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1402 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fiedler Contingency Model
FIEDLER CONTINGENCY MODEL

The Fiedler contingency model is a leadership theory of industrial and organizational psychology developed by Fred Fiedler (born 1922), one of the leading scientists who helped his field move from the research of traits and personal characteristics of leaders to leadership styles and behaviours.

Two factors

The first management style, Taylorists, assumed there was one best style of leadership. Fiedler’s contingency model postulates that the leader’s effectiveness is based on ‘situational contingency’ which is a result of interaction of two factors: leadership style and situational favorableness (later called situational control). More than 400 studies have since investigated this relationship

Least preferred co-worker (LPC)
The leadership style of the leader, thus, fixed and measured by what he calls the least preferred co-worker (LPC) scale, an instrument for measuring an individual’s leadership orientation. The LPC scale asks a leader to think of all the people with whom they have ever worked and then describe the person with whom they have worked least well, using a series of bipolar scales of 1 to 8, such as the following:
|Unfriendly |1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |Friendly |
|Uncooperative |1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |Cooperative |
|Hostile |1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |Supportive |
|.... |1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |.... |
|Guarded |1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |Open |

The responses to these scales (usually 18-25 in total) are summed and averaged: a high LPC score suggests that the leader has a human relations orientation, while a low LPC score indicates a task orientation. Fiedler assumes that everybody's least preferred coworker in fact is on average about equally unpleasant. But people who are indeed relationship motivated, tend to describe their least preferred coworkers in a more positive manner, e.g., more pleasant and more efficient.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Fiedler's contingency theory is a qualification or type of contingency theory. Contingency theories in general state that the effectiveness of leadership depends upon the situation, and there are…

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Leaders encompass principal styles that persuade his or her values and preferences. The Fiedler contingency model centers upon suitable blending amid the leadership conditions and his or her leadership style. Determining a leader’s situation is a necessity within this model. Within the realm of The Path-Goal theory, leaders can escalate subordinate satisfaction and performance through simplifying and clearing the road to goals and by escalating the quantity and types of available rewards concerning goal achievement. The Situational Leadership Theory contends that leadership actions should adapt to match the demands of specific situations as successful leaders must…

    • 1221 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Study: Two Coaches

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Fiedler’s contingency model is designed to help the leader be interactive with their subordinates. The contingency model suggest that it can be determined if they will be effective in a specific setting. The two coaches that are in the case studies are effective in their approach to leadership when it comes to producing winning teams. After carefully reviewing both coaches situation it was obvious that Coach Knight would score low in the LPCs, this low score would mean that he was task driven. Then there is Coach Krzyzewski, he fits the situation where he would score a high LPC because he is motivated through relationships. Both coaches are matched well with their situation. For an example, Coach Knight¸ the highly successful basketball coach confirms Fiedler’s contingency because he is consistent in his leadership approach. Coach Knight’s intense and task-oriented technique seems unvarying. He intensely argues with referees during games and gets very upset to the point where he acts out during games. Coach Knight’s primary goal was to accomplish the task at hand and his minor needs were to build relationships while getting along with others. On the other hand, there is Coach Krzyzewski who spent time getting into his players head in order to understand their…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both contingency and situational theories are based on situational variables determine the leadership styles. Both say that no specific leadership style is best for all environments or certain decision making types. The success of the organization depends on the leadership style that fit the situation and abilities and traits of the group in the situation (Yuki, 2010).…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To determine which alternative layout is better we calculate the weighted distance, wd, scores of the two block plans.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Working at a large healthcare organization, it is important that managers are aware of the different management styles. This will help in being effective leaders. The theory I have identified is Situational Theory. Situational leadership is based on the idea that there is more than one approach to handle a situation. The four leadership styles used with this theory includes: directing, coaching, delegating and supporting.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. A leadership contingency theory that stresses the intelligence and experience of the leader is…

    • 705 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Hersey and Blanchard Situational Leadership Theory was created by Dr Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard in the mid-70’s. The fundamental basis of this theory is that there is no single ‘best’ leadership style and effective leaders have to adapt their styles depending upon the maturity level of delegates. So essentially the model rests on two fundamental concepts; leadership styles and the groups or individuals maturity level [2] .…

    • 7816 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ldr 711

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to the assessment, “What is My Leadership Style?” my score leans toward a task-oriented style along with a situational approach. The foundation of situational leadership is the theory that there is not a style that is the best leadership. According to Hersey and Blanchard (1977), a leader believes his or her actions and styles depend on the situation at hand. A situational leader focuses on contextual factors in the work required (Clawson, 2006).…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fiedler put forward his situational theory in 1958. He proposed that leadership was dependent upon the situation and assumed that all leaders are affected by an inherent set of leadership behaviours, which he believed was difficult to change. He identified two basic leadership styles which were task or relationship orientated. According to Tulsian and Pandey (2008) leaders who are task orientated will perform at the best level when they are in favourable or highly unfavourable situations, whereas leaders who are relationship orientated will perform best when they are in situations of medium…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    My Primary Life Style Inventory score is Dominator at the 97th percentile. Following closely behind is Pragmatist and Self-Empowered being equally high at 95. Fortunately, these two scores are a part of the Constructive Scope. Upon review of these three traits I recognize there are trends in the data which lead to my style of leadership and workplace relationships. There are some aspects which I agree with, some which are in conflict with my personality, but choose to be objective and open-minded to the insights that they give in regards to improvement in communication, performance, and professional development.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    welcome

    • 2055 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Contingency theory to understanding leadership effectiveness attempts to combine elements of both trait and situational theory.…

    • 2055 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to analyze the leadership styles of Coach Krzyzewski and Coach Knight using Fiedler’s Contingency Model. The author will also state a personal opinion regarding whether the coaches were effective based on this theory.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Leadership

    • 5470 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Fiedler (1967) explored the idea that there was not just one ultimate style of leadership for a given circumstance, but leaders would be more effective by varying their leadership style depending on the situations that faced them. So It is evident from the theories that every leader exhibits numerous leadership styles and traits at different point in time.…

    • 5470 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Acute Goal Setting Skills

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages

    LOC refers to how much control an individual has on a particular of situation or a scenario and how external factors affect his decision making. I have always been an emotional person and often empathize with others and due to which many of my decisions were affected by various external factors-questions like how my decision would hurt a third person or what if my decisions went wrong have hampered my actual decision making. This may be good from a moral perspective, but it has negatively affected my plans and how I execute them which eventually affected the result. There were many instances in my professional life where I had let my emotions control me which put me in a rather difficult situation. I consider this as my weakness and I really want to improve myself in this regard and would work towards not letting emotions affect my decision making or leadership skills. I understand that having control on a scenario, without getting affected emotionally, and exploiting it is always a key to excellence. For my personal growth and responsibility, I found myself to work on my emotions by following the guidelines of SMART goals process. I consider to be letting myself to use my emotions intelligently and compassionate approach to goal setting. While doing my emotionally intelligent goal setting I have to put extra effort on my vision and break down my goals into a series of specific objectives. I have to control my emotional constraints like aspirations, ambitions, wishes and…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays