Preview

Fiedler Model

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
267 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fiedler Model
Fred Fiedler developed the first comprehensive contingency model for leadership
Fiedler's contingency model proposes that effective group performance depends on the proper match between the leader's style and the degree to which the situation gives control to the leader. The model consists of three steps. The first step is identifying the leadership style. To find out the leadership style Fiedler created the least preferred co-worker questionnaire. The questionnaire measures whether a person is task oriented or relationship oriented. The test requires the test taker to think about all the co-workers they have ever had and to describe the one person they least enjoyed working with by rating him/her on a scale of 1 to 8 of 16 sets of contrasting adjectives. If the least preferred co-worker is describe in positive terms then the respondent is a relationship oriented leader. And if the least preferred co-worker is describe in negative terms then the respondent is a task oriented leader. The second step is defining the situation. Fiedler stated three contingency dimensions that define situational factors that in turn determine leadership effectiveness. These three contingency dimensions are leader-member relations, task structure and position power. The last is matching leaders and situations. Fiedler says that task oriented leaders perform best in situations of high and low control. And relationship oriented leaders perform best moderate control situations. Fiedler and an associate also came up with the cognitive resource theory. The theory states that stress unfavorably affects a situation and that intelligence and experience can lessen the influence of stress on the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bus/520 Week 1

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Theory Y is based on a set of beliefs that managers should take an empowering approach to management. The average human does not inherently dislike work. Depending on controllable conditions, work may be a source of satisfaction. Rules, top-down managerial control, and the threat of punishment are not the only means for achieving organizational goals. Employees will exercise self-direction and control in the service of goals to which they are committed. The average person learns, under proper conditions, not only to accept but to seek responsibility. The capacity to exercise a relatively high degree of imagination, ingenuity, and creativity in the solution to organizational problems is widely, not narrowly, distributed in the population. Based on the above model trait leader role in Theory Y, the leader is there to motivate and direct the motivation of the employees toward organizational goals. Theory Y leaders rely more on the self-control and self-direction of their subordinates. Theory X allows for more individual accountability through micromanagement and workplace techniques while Model Y utilizes more self-monitoring techniques. Leaders don’t necessarily stick to model but they can exercise both models. There are other models that can come into play with leaders such as the Situational Leadership and the V-Room…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ldr 531 Week 1

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Trait Approach assumes that some people are natural leaders and examines motives, values, personality, and skills. The Behavior Approach branches into two sections. One method to the Behavior Approach is to look at leader behavior. What does the leader actually do? The other portion of the Behavior approach is to determine what actions are helpful and what actions are less helpful for leaders. The Power-Influence Approach looks at leadership from the perspective of power. This approach asks the questions like, “What type of power does the leader have in regards to the followers?” This approach looks at the amount and type of influence the leader has on the people around him or her. The situational approach looks at the situation leader must deal with. This approach examines the mission of the unit, the type of organization the leader is a part of, and the nature of the work environment. The Integrative Approach involves multiple types of approaches. Participative Approach involves both the behavior and the power-influence approach. Participate leadership involves the group in decision-making and creates a sense of project ownership by the group. Members who feel empowered are more committed to mission accomplishment. For these reasons, the Participative Approach is the desired…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    LDR 531 Exam

    • 1237 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The concept that some leadership attributes will work in some situations but not in others can be described by the…

    • 1237 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    6. A theory that emphasizes leader traits and skills as determinants of leadership behavior is best categorized at what level?…

    • 705 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hughes et al 2014 defined leadership behaviors as actions taken in response to situations. Behaviors were defined as a function of personality, knowledge, experience, traits, intelligence attitudes, values, and interests. Available literature suggests that while some traits are common across studies, the overall findings suggest that leaders in one situation may not necessarily be leaders in all situations. According to the contingency theory approach,…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    * A correct and appropriate description is given of two or more issue that will influence the choice of leadership styles or behaviours in workplace situations although the description may be limited and the links to workplace situations may be more understood than clear (criteria for a pass on this question)…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ldr 711

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to the assessment, “What is My Leadership Style?” my score leans toward a task-oriented style along with a situational approach. The foundation of situational leadership is the theory that there is not a style that is the best leadership. According to Hersey and Blanchard (1977), a leader believes his or her actions and styles depend on the situation at hand. A situational leader focuses on contextual factors in the work required (Clawson, 2006).…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    (Northouse, 2013) The behavior approach focus on what leaders should do, verses what they should know or be, as in the other approaches. I tested higher in relationship than in task behaviors. I feel that this assessment is accurate; although I found it hard to correlate to my evaluations and counseling that I receive from my supervisors.…

    • 1729 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fiedler put forward his situational theory in 1958. He proposed that leadership was dependent upon the situation and assumed that all leaders are affected by an inherent set of leadership behaviours, which he believed was difficult to change. He identified two basic leadership styles which were task or relationship orientated. According to Tulsian and Pandey (2008) leaders who are task orientated will perform at the best level when they are in favourable or highly unfavourable situations, whereas leaders who are relationship orientated will perform best when they are in situations of medium…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This task-related readiness consists of two parts: an employee’s ability and technical skill to accomplish a task, and an employee’s level of self-confidence (Goodson et al., 1989). For instance, one might argue that the most appropriate leadership style-readiness for the student workers at WCBA is one of high structure/low consideration. According to Goodson et al. (1989), this is useful when an employee has low subordinate readiness as in the case of the student…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Benner Model

    • 3584 Words
    • 15 Pages

    This paper will discuss the role of caring along with the Benner model’s seven domains and my level of proficiency in each domain. Each level of proficiency will be explored to show my strengths as a professional and also areas that I could improve on as a professional nurse. With the areas that need improvement I will show support through supportive rationale with a research article. I will describe how I plan on gaining proficiency in my area of needed improvement, all while using critical thinking and written communication skills.…

    • 3584 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    welcome

    • 2055 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Contingency theory to understanding leadership effectiveness attempts to combine elements of both trait and situational theory.…

    • 2055 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    understanding leadership

    • 2750 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Describe the factors that will influence the choice of leadership styles or behaviours in workplace situations…

    • 2750 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A leader’s orientation can be described by measuring the “esteem of the least preferred co-worker” scale (Chemers & Skrzypek, 1972, p. 172). This scale, developed by Feidler, “asks the individual to think of all of the individuals with whom he has ever worked and to rate the one person with whom he could work least well” (Chemers & Skrzypek, 1972, p. 172). Based on how the “least preferred…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Contingency Model was created by Fred Fiedler in 1967; it states that the leader 's effectiveness is based on situational contingencies defined by two aspects: leadership style and situational favorableness (Miller, 2004). This model utilizes an instrument to measure an individual 's leadership orientation. The scores are ranked and leaders defined as Least Preferred Co-Worker (low-LPC or high-LPC leaders. Fiedler 's theory is that leaders have natural styles and, consequently, companies need to change the leader 's environment to suit that particular style (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2003).…

    • 2245 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays