Film Analysis: Food, Inc.

What Consumer’s Don’t Know About Their Food?
"The way we eat has changed more dramatically in the past 50 years than in the previous 10,000 years." Food, Inc. is a documentary film directed by Robert Kenner in 2008. In the film it's pointed out that one of the important changes in what we eat is that our food supply has been flooded with sugar and other refined carbohydrates. "Food, Inc." is about how these and other changes came to be, and the little-known state of our present food system. This film has multiple aspects that educate people on the way their food is processed and what the United States can do to change how it is made. It focuses on the major aspects of how meat today is produced and how genetically modified food alter the appearance, taste, and overall quality of our factories that produce meat, poultry and even vegetables. What kind of actions should take place in order for our food to be safer?
Narrated mostly by Eric Schlosser (Fast Food Nation) and Michael Pollan (The Omnivore's Dilemma and In Defense of Food), "Food, Inc." starts from several places on the "food web." We see the points of view of farmers, food workers, and consumers, among others.
It looks at many issues involved with food production, such as worker safety, food safety, and food labeling. One strength of the movie is that instead of just talking about it, we go right out into the fields with the farmers, into the grocery store with a poor family trying to put food on the table, and into the feedlots and slaughterhouses (sometimes having to resort to hidden
cameras).
The movie points out that almost the entire food system of the United States is now in the hands of very few companies. For example, in 1970, six companies produced 20% to 25% of the meat consumed in the U.S. Now, four companies produce 80% of the meat. Where there used to be thousands of slaughterhouses in the country, now there are 13. One problem coming from this is that when something goes wrong, for example, contamination, it affects an enormous amount of food. Another is that food is being transported greater and greater distances. It turns out that the more centralized our food system is, the more vulnerable and fragile it is.
The film also focuses on how the consolidation of food production is affecting farmers. One chicken farmer wanted to continue to farm in an "old-fashioned way" where light gets into the chicken houses. She was cut off from that idea. Another farmer described how the large companies keep their farmers in debt, with very little actual income, by piling on more and more requirements. Some companies, such as Monsanto, have systematically eliminated most of the farmers who are their competition by means of expensive litigation. In this way, they have gained control over 80% of the U.S. soybean crop in just 11 years.

Large government subsidies for corn, wheat, and soybeans help continue the system, so the food corporations put key people into positions in the government including the FDA. Thus, we have vast amounts of cheap, fast, carbs available, but expensive broccoli. But this film is not just doom and gloom. All over the U.S., people are starting to make changes, and the movie makes a big point of the fact that "we vote for the food system we want, three times a day." These changes in consumer demand have, for example, gotten organic foods into Walmart. One farmer I really liked was Joel Salatin, whose Polyface Farm is featured in the book The Omnivore's Dilemma. I wish the filmmaker had showed even more of the system he uses of rotating his cattle over his land, followed a few days later by his portable chicken houses, to the benefit of the animals and the land.
Eric Schlosser stated, “There is a deliberate veil, this curtain that is dropped between us and where our food is coming from”. The assembly lines and feedlots mostly contribute to mass production of meat that is unsanitary, for example E.Coli. Also, the cheap agriculture, which feeds most of the United States, is heavily subsidized and helps skew our food system to the bad calories. This causes various diseases that can be prevented by saying no to consuming fast food and instead buying your vegetables and meat from local farmers in your area. One statistic that was almost unbelievable was that 1 in 3 Americans born after the year 2000 would contract early onset diabetes. This statistic is outrageous! Food Inc. really convinces people to stop and think about what you are eating and to read food labels to find out what is in your purchase. I believe this is a great source, because after watching this movie I never want to purchase meat from a superstore or even eat another cheeseburger from a fast food chain in my life. This source is completely reliable since they solved the real mysteries behind our food industry and what they are doing wrong to not only their actions, but to the American people.
Why this story is little known is a story in itself. In a dramatic change from 100 years ago, we don't know where our food is coming from -- which is exactly how the large food corporations want it.
The film finishes with a lot of steps we can take, from supporting our local food economies to writing our Congress people. We are far from powerless in this situation, but if we don't seize that power, the current food production system (which is having negative effects all over the world) will just continue to grow.
Often when a movie is described as "important" many people run the other way. But if you've read this far, you are probably someone who really does want to know where the food you put in your body comes from. And, truly, it's hard for me to think of many things more important than that. As this film states at the end of the production, consumers vote for the way food will be produced - three times a day. We as consumers have a responsibility to ourselves to remain informed about the food we eat. If we sit back and passively accept the food in the condition it is presented to us, there will be no changes made to the process.