Findings Of Project
CHAPTER FINDINGS
1. The analysis shows that there is 0% Respondents Opinion for excellent, 1% for Very good, 20% for good and there is also 22% opinion is average and 25% for poor and very poor 32%. Reitzel has a large no. of people those are not satisfied with the Distribution Supply.
2. By the analysis we conduct that there is 6% for the excellent, 29% Respondents opinion for very good, 8% for average 30%, for poor 24% and also 3% for very poor.
Reitzel has friendliness of distribution supply, Reitzel effective techniques for take attention of Respondents.
3. By the analysis is there is 5% response for excellent, and very good 20%, 25% for good and there is 36% response for poor and very poor 14%.
Reitzel makes the huge no. of satisfied respondents by its service of distribution supply. It is helpful to increase the respondents relationship and also for the sales of the company
4. By the analysis there is 0% response for excellent, 6% very good, 26% good, 34% average, 15% for poor and there is also 19% very poor.
Reitzel has poor distribution supply, where respondent gets quick response of his queries, it makes the good relationship between the company and respondent.
5. By the analysis there is 10% response for excellent, 30% for very good, 35% response for good, and also 25% response for poor.
Reitzel has large no. of satisfied respondents by its services and quality. But in urban area Reitzel is not so much successful.
6. By the analysis we conduct that there is 47% for Quality, 28% for Durability of Long Life, 12% for Distribution of Supply, 6% for Price, and also 7% for others.
There is large no. of respondents have Quality conscious and they prefer the Reitzel product for Durability of Long Life.
7. The analysis shows that there is 30% for Hugo Reitzel, for Delmonte 10%, 25% for American Garden, 15% for Merxirico, 20% for
1. The analysis shows that there is 0% Respondents Opinion for excellent, 1% for Very good, 20% for good and there is also 22% opinion is average and 25% for poor and very poor 32%. Reitzel has a large no. of people those are not satisfied with the Distribution Supply.
2. By the analysis we conduct that there is 6% for the excellent, 29% Respondents opinion for very good, 8% for average 30%, for poor 24% and also 3% for very poor.
Reitzel has friendliness of distribution supply, Reitzel effective techniques for take attention of Respondents.
3. By the analysis is there is 5% response for excellent, and very good 20%, 25% for good and there is 36% response for poor and very poor 14%.
Reitzel makes the huge no. of satisfied respondents by its service of distribution supply. It is helpful to increase the respondents relationship and also for the sales of the company
4. By the analysis there is 0% response for excellent, 6% very good, 26% good, 34% average, 15% for poor and there is also 19% very poor.
Reitzel has poor distribution supply, where respondent gets quick response of his queries, it makes the good relationship between the company and respondent.
5. By the analysis there is 10% response for excellent, 30% for very good, 35% response for good, and also 25% response for poor.
Reitzel has large no. of satisfied respondents by its services and quality. But in urban area Reitzel is not so much successful.
6. By the analysis we conduct that there is 47% for Quality, 28% for Durability of Long Life, 12% for Distribution of Supply, 6% for Price, and also 7% for others.
There is large no. of respondents have Quality conscious and they prefer the Reitzel product for Durability of Long Life.
7. The analysis shows that there is 30% for Hugo Reitzel, for Delmonte 10%, 25% for American Garden, 15% for Merxirico, 20% for