Preview

Flaws In America Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
815 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Flaws In America Research Paper
The United States of America recently had a presidential election. If you’re reading this statistically you are not happy about the results because the candidate you voted for did not win. The candidate that won the majority of popular votes lost the election. The number of Americans that voted for Hillary Clinton is larger than the number of Americans that voted for Donald Trump. Trump won the most number of electoral college votes, but lost the popular vote. He did not win because the majority of Americans voted for him. He won because the majority of electorates voted for him. This has caused people to feel cheated. Perhaps the system is rigged, and the electoral college are the ones that rigged it. In the interest of free and fair elections I would like to consider and outline the different ways United States federal elections and federal government could be improved upon. There are a number of different ways in which …show more content…
The three branches of government provide an important system of checks and balances, but these branches are flawed. The current Congress has used it's power as the legislative branch against the executive branch, to obstruct President Barack Obama's appointment to the judicial branch, the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Justices are appointed by the POTUS and approved by Congress. Since US Supreme Court justices serve without term limits the Supreme Court can stay controlled by one political party election cycle after election cycle. The simplest solution to increase bipartisanship and improve upon representation within the US Supreme Court, with as little change as possible, is not to impose term limits for appointed justices, or to require justices to be elected by voters, but by requiring that close to half of the appointed justices be made up of members of the opposing party. This means out of the nine justices, four must be justices from the opposing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I feel that the electoral college system needs to be removed from our presidential elections. It causes more harm than good and, makes many voters not vote. There are pros and cons to the system but, there are too many cons for it to continue. Presidential candidates only care about big states “for the win”. Which makes voters think they're small electoral college state is worthless. So in this essay, I will convince you and, tell you the truth behind the Electoral College system.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ever since its creation at the Constitutional Convention in 1787, the Electoral College has been the most widely debated aspect in the Constitution. There have been over 700 proposed constitutional amendments aimed at fixing or abolishing this process. And Congress has on several occasions held highly publicized hearings on Electoral College reform but overall has remained fairly inactive (Best, p. vii). And while the Electoral College is a cornerstone of our Constitution and therefore a major aspect of American democracy and government, its very nature is quite unfair and undemocratic. Many of its aspects portray biases and favor certain groups of people and certain states. It is deemed archaic, undemocratic, complex, ambiguous, indirect, and dangerous by many scholars and is in direct need of reforming (Kura, p. 30). It especially contradicts Walter Stone’s instrumental voting model for the Electoral College at first makes one believe as if one’s vote counts but eventually one figures out that it is in fact quite unimportant (Stone, p. 51). For with the Electoral College, the people are not in charge but rather the system is – the Electoral College presidential election system that is.…

    • 4911 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people disagree with the Electoral College because they believe the system gives an unfair advantage to states with a large electoral vote. For example, there can be a candidate that does not get one single vote in, but they can still be elected by winning the popular vote in the bigger states, that have more number of electoral voters. Even if a candidate wins the majority of the smaller states, they will not win presidency because it does not have enough electoral votes. A candidate may have a high overall popular vote; however the one who wins is the one with the highest electoral…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    3. Briefly explain one proposal for changing the Electoral College process without abolishing it (i.e., without having to amend the Constitution).…

    • 1824 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College, established by the founding fathers in the United States Constitution, is a process whereby a body of electors chosen by voters in each state cast a formal vote to elect the president and vice president. Among many other things established within the Constitution, the Electoral College requires extensive reform. The Constitution itself was merely a framework for the United States government and did not take into account the extent to which society would change between 1787 and 2015. Amidst the several problems constituted by the Electoral College, the four most threatening complications consist of the possibility for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote, the inequality among the distribution of votes according to population, the exclusion of third party victors, and the consequences that arise in case of a tie.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College is an institution that may have served a purpose 200 years ago when the founding fathers needed a system that would be met with approval by both large and small states. The Electoral College is a flawed method of electing our President that has created problems in previous elections and is likely to be the source of problems in the future. The Electoral College provides an undemocratic method of choosing our president that potentially undermines the will of the voters. Not only can a candidate be elected without actually winning the most votes, it puts our elections at the mercy of electors who don't always cast their vote as pledged. I intend to demonstrate that the problems inherent in this voting method far outweigh any benefits it may provide. Replacing the winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes with a system such as proportional representation or eliminating the college altogether in favor of direct election is the best way to ensure a trouble-free and fair election…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This would make sure that there would be a balance of older and younger justice to balance generational changes. Other branches of government have a time period. President could appoint multiple justices which could cause many of them to have the same ideals. Supreme Court justices should have term limits in place in order to reflect the…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ever since the constitution has been written, the president of the united states has been elected via the electoral college. Despite its long-time usage, the electoral college has many critics. Various people, wish for the president to be elected via a popular vote. While others, continue to be happy with usage of the electoral college. Others, simply are confused by the process of the electoral college all together. This leads to many political scientists to question if the electoral college is in fact effective, or if a popular vote would be better. However, both the popular vote and the electoral college have pros and cons.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critics argue that this system listens to the minority. In fact, it does not, this system discourages minority by using the winner take all rule. The winner take all rule promotes the idea that 49.9% of voters might get no representation. The Electoral should be changed to a proportional representation system, a method of voting by which political parties are given legislative representation in proportion to their popular vote. For example, in a state with 21 electors and 47% votes for Republicans and 53% for Democrats should get electors proportional to the popular vote, which would be 11 electors for Democrats and 9 for Republicans. This system would be much fair and would help represent both the minority and the majority of a certain state. Proportional elector system will not only encourage voter turnout, but also help accurately reflect the views of the public. Another reason why the Electoral College should be changed is because there is a theoretical possibility that a president loses the popular vote but still wins the electoral votes. As history shows, in the election of 1888 between Benjamin Harrison and Grover Cleveland, Benjamin Harrison won the election with plurality of the Electoral Vote (Harrison - 233 Electoral votes, Cleveland – 168 Electoral Votes),…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Isn’t America just great? Beautiful heavens, even buildings. Nope, America is a great place for the most part but at the same time, it is a bad place. America is full of bad people but it is also full of good people.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The system of electing our president has been fairly consistent throughout the past 50 years and one thing that has not changed since our constitution was written is the use of an electoral college to elect the president. By using an Electoral College voters do not directly vote for their next president, instead they submit a vote that is then tallied by the electors and whichever party has the most votes at the end gets all of the Electoral College votes from that state. The use of an Electoral College has been the topic of a lot of debate in recent years, especially after the election in the year 2000 in which Al Gore won the popular vote, but failed to become president because George W. Bush won the electoral votes. There are people whom favor the use of an electoral college and there are people who think that it should be abolished and that voters should be able to directly vote for their president. For my paper I want to present both arguments, each side’s pros and cons, and ultimately whether or not I think we should or should not change the use of an electoral college.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contrary to popular belief, America’s presidents are not elected by direct democratic vote of the people. Rather, the United States Constitution says that they are elected by the Electoral College.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Another example is the 2000 election, the president candidate Al Gore won the popular vote, however, the other president candidate George W. Bush won the electoral college (Mayer). This occasions hasn’t happened recently, it also happened in the early election history three instances: 1876, 1888 and 1960 (Edwards 62). As a result of these elections, it ignores the will of the people. United States is built with democracy and it seemed that electoral college is an undemocratic system. Jonathan Chait, an American liberal commentator and writer for New York magazine, argues that “the electoral college failed to mention the most egregious aspect of the process: it subverts democracy. It makes an utter mockery of the principle of one man, one vote.,” (“Electoral College, Pros”). It questions if the Electoral College favors the people at…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the electoral college has worked for us all these years we need a change. The election would run so more smoothly if it was just based on the popular vote, and it would be beneficial for all. The electoral college needs to be abolished for the sake of the equality of the people's vote, state power, and for a candidate to actually be…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Document #2 shows a graph that represents the number of electoral votes based off the population. It is shown that the more people there are in a state, the more electoral votes the state receives. This does not mean that votes in a larger state count for more, in fact that is incorrect. Document #4 explains the how many voters are represented by each electoral vote. It is proven that smaller populated states are given more power towards the election and their votes. This is because there are less electoral votes, allowing their vote to count for a greater percentage. It is unfair to someone who can not afford to live in a certain place that allows more voting powers. Votes should not be based on population but should simply be counted for every person. It would surprisingly be easier to count the votes for every person instead of having to count the votes and translating them into electoral votes based on districts. Electoral votes give less power to the people and it can be unfair because even though a president elect may have the majority vote, they may not become president if they do not have the most electoral votes. This is unreasonable because if the majority of voters choose a certain president elect, that person should become president. The Electoral College is inefficient to the voters living in the United…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays