Intro Paragraph
Imagine one of the highest ranked government officials having a memory loss disease such as Alzheimer’s. One-in-nine Americans over 65 has Alzheimer’s disease. Currently, seven out of the eight Supreme Court Justices is over the age of 65. Supreme Court justices serve a life-long term according to the Constitution, but there should be a term limit. This would make sure that there would be a balance of older and younger justice to balance generational changes. Other branches of government have a time period. President could appoint multiple justices which could cause many of them to have the same ideals.Supreme Court justices should have term limits in place in order to reflect the …show more content…
This means that the Justices may hold office until they die, reign, or are impeached. Impeachment is the only exception to the phrase good behavior. As it states in Article II that Supreme Court justices can be removed from office by impeachment, just as the president and vice president can. Only one Justice, Samuel Chase, was ever impeached and that was in 1804. The Constitution was created in 1787, and since then many things have changed. In 1787, the average life expectancy for white males living in America was 38 years. Today, the average life expectancy. Today, the life expectancy is about 81 years. The average age of the first Supreme Court was 69.4. The average was boosted by John Jay’s unusually long life of 84 years. Now, the average of a Supreme Court Justice is 87.8. “The Constitution was written at a time when life tenure meant living into your 50s because that’s what life expectancy was. Thirty-year tenures are not what the framers had in mind” (Jeffrey Toobin). Justices are staying on the Court for longer periods and also leaving office at older ages than ever before, this means that vacancies are opening up much less