Preview

Examples Of Term Limits Of Supreme Court Justices

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1104 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Term Limits Of Supreme Court Justices
Term Limits for the Supreme Court Justices
Intro Paragraph
Imagine one of the highest ranked government officials having a memory loss disease such as Alzheimer’s. One-in-nine Americans over 65 has Alzheimer’s disease. Currently, seven out of the eight Supreme Court Justices is over the age of 65. Supreme Court justices serve a life-long term according to the Constitution, but there should be a term limit. This would make sure that there would be a balance of older and younger justice to balance generational changes. Other branches of government have a time period. President could appoint multiple justices which could cause many of them to have the same ideals.Supreme Court justices should have term limits in place in order to reflect the
…show more content…
This means that the Justices may hold office until they die, reign, or are impeached. Impeachment is the only exception to the phrase good behavior. As it states in Article II that Supreme Court justices can be removed from office by impeachment, just as the president and vice president can. Only one Justice, Samuel Chase, was ever impeached and that was in 1804. The Constitution was created in 1787, and since then many things have changed. In 1787, the average life expectancy for white males living in America was 38 years. Today, the average life expectancy. Today, the life expectancy is about 81 years. The average age of the first Supreme Court was 69.4. The average was boosted by John Jay’s unusually long life of 84 years. Now, the average of a Supreme Court Justice is 87.8. “The Constitution was written at a time when life tenure meant living into your 50s because that’s what life expectancy was. Thirty-year tenures are not what the framers had in mind” (Jeffrey Toobin). Justices are staying on the Court for longer periods and also leaving office at older ages than ever before, this means that vacancies are opening up much less

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As the Constitution was created, some topics were explained in great detail, yet some were explained very vaguely causing many disputes over how certain topics should be dealt with. In Article III, it states how the Judicial Branch works. It decides what the court bases their decisions on. In Article II of the U.S. Constitution it states how a justice must be replaced, who picks the new justice, which is the president, yet there is no time frame stated on how long it must take to pick a new justice. The president of the United States is to pick the new justice and the Senate confirms it. After a sudden death to Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia, the decision must be made to pick a new justice now or to allow the new…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The pros of lifetime of judges in the Supreme Court are that they do not have to worry about the political pressure or to contribute with money for any political campaign. “The basic purpose of lifetime appointment is to assure the integrity of the power granted to Court Justices and protect them against unwarranted interference from either the legislative or executive branch”. (laws, n.d.). In addition, there are judges in the Supreme Court that worries about make a fair system…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although their are pro's and con's for each argument, I believe that it is better for the country to have no term limits on supreme court justices. It seems to me that the problems term limits cause, such as strategic retirement, are preferable to the alternative possibility, that the justices begin making decisions based on what would best help their personal careers in the…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federal Judges Quiz Paper

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    | Correct, "Article III federal judges" (as opposed to judges of some courts with special jurisdictions) serve "during good behavior" (often paraphrased as appointed "for life"). Judges hold their seats until they resign, die, or are removed from office.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Jefferson took office in 1801 the republicans controlled both the Executive and the Legislative branch, the Judicial Branch on the other hand was still largely controlled by the Federalists. John Adams knew this was coming so he wanted to make sure the federalists keep the Judicial branch, he made the Judiciary Act of 1801, where Adams assigned new justices to the supreme court every night until the day of Jefferson’s Inauguration. These legal documents were called “midnight appointments” that sat on the president’s desk when Jefferson took office so, the supreme court could not do anything about them. Jefferson took the easy choice and kept these documents from the reach of the supreme court by handing them to Madison, and even though…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    guarantee the honesty of the power allowed to Court Justices and protect them against unjust interference from either the legislative or executive branch. And also to protect our Supreme Judges from political pressure. But, I believe this can still be done by setting an specific time for the judge to leave the position and therefore, I believe it is unnecessary for judges to hold their position for lifetime.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme court members are guaranteed a job for a life time, by accepting a job in the supreme court you make a promise to your country. Many justices make their decisions based of the constitution in either a liberal or conservative way based off their…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Justices are appointed, they take the oath to make decisions that are fair and according to the Constitution. The decisions justices take every day affect the lives of Americans in many ways. The Justices are given the heavy responsibility to interpret the law and Constitution. However, many times Justices get confused about the original intent of the law, and therefore interpret it different from what the legislators wrote back then. Since the legislators of the Constitution are not alive today, Justices have to try their best to make decisions according to the law.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is an argument wether President Obama should replace the justice in the election year or wait and let the next president choose.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Supreme Court justices are appointed in the same manner as all Federal Constitutional Judges, by the President with the advise of the U.S. Senate for life terms without a reduction in pay. This is to assure judicial independence. The impact would be enormous if the Supreme Court justices had to be elected to office by the people. If they were elected by the people they would not make every decision fairly, they would not be in office for life and they wouldn't be as well respected.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court needs younger judges to function better. The supreme courts judges will not function very well because they are missing one judge out of nine judges. For example “Antonin Scalia suffered from coronary artery disease, obesity and diabetes” and this shows that the Supreme Court will not function properly with old judges. Therefore, term limits are a great idea because younger judges are less likely to have any medical problems that will interfere with their job. 10-20 years is long enough for a judge to build up genuine exercise and genuine powers and the majority of Americans are in favor.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Roe V. Wade Analysis

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages

    If our system of government and lawmaking has helped us progress so significantly in values, I can only believe that we will continue to fix injustices as we have in the past. We have moved beyond slavery and segregation. If justices are to interpret the Constitution to keep up with the times we will lose a very important aspect of our society. The Constitution gives us something that we all feel is real and constant. Being conservative on issues involving the bench does not mean that we are forwarding conservative legislations. The framers only wanted certain things to remain the same through all…

    • 1619 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    We need Justices in the courts to put their jobs and the needs of the people before themselves and any of their personal biases. How could a Justice rule accurately to what the people need and what is fair if they do not listen to what is being needed or even outright reject something only on the grounds that their personal beliefs deem it wrong? If a Justice was allowed to do this, black rights would never have been established, the rights for gays to get married would never have passed and women may have never been able to vote or be paid accordingly. Because of issues such as these, we need someone who puts their duties before all…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Power Of The Supreme Court

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages

    But the judge does still not want to hear the case for new evidence. The Supreme Court judges are not elected but are appointed by the president and the people don’t have a say in who the judges are. Judges are also getting appointed earlier and serve up to 30-40 years, which is way more than one person should be able to serve. For example, Anthony Kennedy was appointed at age 51 and is now 81. He has served for 30 years and is still going, it is not fair that Supreme Court justices get to stay in position for life.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judges should not be elected to serve on the bench by the citizenry through normal election procedure, because the average citizen knows nothing about the intricacies of the law and the difference between a sound judge and a poor one. Judges should be appointed by a body of their legal peers instead of being elected in a popularity contest by the masses.…

    • 2478 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays