Preview

Essay On Supreme Court Term Limits

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
625 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Supreme Court Term Limits
Jesus Rodriguez
May-2-2016
Mr. Hanawalt
5period
Supreme Court term limits The Supreme Court needs younger judges to function better. The supreme courts judges will not function very well because they are missing one judge out of nine judges. For example “Antonin Scalia suffered from coronary artery disease, obesity and diabetes” and this shows that the Supreme Court will not function properly with old judges. Therefore, term limits are a great idea because younger judges are less likely to have any medical problems that will interfere with their job. 10-20 years is long enough for a judge to build up genuine exercise and genuine powers and the majority of Americans are in favor. Younger judges are less likely to have any medical problems that will interfere with their job because there have been incidents of medical problems that the supreme judges had faced. For example, supreme court judge Antonin Scalia he suffered the coronary artery disease, obesity disease and diabetes and he died because of significant medical conditions so that’s why we should have younger judges.”According to reports, Breyer left a hospital bed to meet with Clinton while still suffering from a broken rib and punctured lung which is letting us know how older
…show more content…
There are large majorities of Americans that are in favor of establishing term limits for the members of the U.S house and senate.” A loss for Mr. Obama would vindicate Republicans accusations that he has acted lawlessly in exceeding the limits of presidential power” which is saying how the republicans feel like Obama is not doing his job right. “You would sue them instantly” which is referring to the treatment that the parties give immigrants (By: Adam Liptak and Michael D. Shear April 18,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The pros of lifetime of judges in the Supreme Court are that they do not have to worry about the political pressure or to contribute with money for any political campaign. “The basic purpose of lifetime appointment is to assure the integrity of the power granted to Court Justices and protect them against unwarranted interference from either the legislative or executive branch”. (laws, n.d.). In addition, there are judges in the Supreme Court that worries about make a fair system…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | L.O. 16-1: Identify the basic elements of the American judicial system and the major participants in it, pp. 468-470.…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although having increased slots in the Supreme Court would boost the potential for diversity, the amendment fails to cause any meaningful change in the actual diversity of the Court. Additionally, allowing for the possibility of a deadlocked Supreme Court would greatly increase the power of the appellate court. This power increase could have some negative side effects, as appointments to the appellate court do not have the same scrutiny as Supreme Court appointments. Sabato’s third amendment has too many issues to be applied to the Constitution, striking a strong contrast to his fourth amendment. Sabato’s final amendment, in my opinion, would bring a much-needed improvement to the federal courts. Naturally, these judges need to have a salary that covers their living expenses, as requiring judges to ask for raises from Congress can allow for serious biases or manipulation to enter play. This amendment also lacks any meaningful downsides, as its worst drawback is simply increasing spending by the federal government. Overall, while two of Sabato’s amendments would work well, the second and third would bring many issues and need more…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although their are pro's and con's for each argument, I believe that it is better for the country to have no term limits on supreme court justices. It seems to me that the problems term limits cause, such as strategic retirement, are preferable to the alternative possibility, that the justices begin making decisions based on what would best help their personal careers in the…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since the days of Chief Justice John Marshall, The Supreme Court has been the arbiter of constitutionality among the three branches of government. Through this judicial review, The Supreme Court has become the bastion of The Constitution. In the current case of Zivotofsky v. Kerry, the very checks and balances that hold the triarchy of American government stable are bearing inspection. Fomented in a small passage of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act in 2002 with, “for purposes of the registration of birth, certification of nationality, or issuance of a passport of a United States citizen born in the city of Jerusalem, the Secretary shall, upon the request of the citizen or the citizen’s legal guardian, record the place of birth as Israel”…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federal Judges Quiz Paper

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    | Correct, "Article III federal judges" (as opposed to judges of some courts with special jurisdictions) serve "during good behavior" (often paraphrased as appointed "for life"). Judges hold their seats until they resign, die, or are removed from office.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The idea that term limits would go against the constitution is not a true fact. Term limits were proposed during the formation of the American democracy by Benjamin Franklin, James Madison, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams. They proposed this to try and “eliminate the possibility of any tyranny that could come from being in office to long, and considering the fact that they had just won the freedom from Great Britain and King Louis the XVI”. This idea of term limits has been around for some time in the United States and has been addressed as far back as ancient Greece and Rome. There is no evidence that has been found during the research for this essay that said anything about term limits ever being instated in ancient Greece or Rome, but that is not to say that it did not happen even if for a short period. Term limits have been instated in multiple states. Fifteen have term limits in effect and Florida just passed a term limit law. The six states that had term limits have had…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fdr Supreme Court Packing

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On February 5th, 1937, after months of planning, FDR announced his Federal Court Reorganization Bill. This legislation provided for an additional seat on the Supreme Court for each justice over the age of seventy, with a maximum of six new positions; proctors for litigation in the Supreme Court and lower federal courts; and additional judgeships in lower federal courts for judges over the age of seventy. President…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Having our Supreme Court Justice serving on the bench for life can have pros and cons. Although, most of our fellows americans seem to have more drawbacks about our Supreme Court of Justice life tenure position. With this in mind, let me first mention the pros…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Term Limits for the Supreme Court Justices Intro Paragraph Imagine one of the highest ranked government officials having a memory loss disease such as Alzheimer’s. One-in-nine Americans over 65 has Alzheimer’s disease. Currently, seven out of the eight Supreme Court Justices is over the age of 65. Supreme Court justices serve a life-long term according to the Constitution, but there should be a term limit.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After claiming that the good behavior clause is outdated, Levingson turns the attention to the increasing length of term justices serve on the Supreme Court. He argues that lifetime employment of judges creates opportunity to have incompetent ones. He makes this clear while referencing the situation Justice William O. Douglas found himself in, persistent in remaining on the court after a debilitating stroke; "his colleagues resolved basically not to count his vote in any case in which it would have been decisive, as in 5-4 opinions" (Levinson, p.129). Levinson argues that such a judge choosing to remain on the shelf past his expiration date can even be debilitating to the court system because he remains on the court for egoistic reasons more so than a desire to serve the justice system. He makes this definitively clear by the claim that "the elderly [should have] perspective about their condition if they occupy important public positions. Even if Rehnquist had a constitutional right to stay on the court, he should not have done so" (Levinson,…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abraham Lincoln once said, “Don’t interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties” (Shmoop.com). On September 17th, 1787 the signing of Constitution of the United States of America took place. The members of the Constitutional Convention met to create a strong, centralized government after the dissatisfaction of the Articles of Confederation. The Constitution created a government made by the people, for the people, which includes minors. Every American citizen has undeniable rights that are provided in the Constitution and that should also protect minors while they are at school and at home, where they should be able to express themselves without punishment as well.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Supreme Court justices are appointed in the same manner as all Federal Constitutional Judges, by the President with the advise of the U.S. Senate for life terms without a reduction in pay. This is to assure judicial independence. The impact would be enormous if the Supreme Court justices had to be elected to office by the people. If they were elected by the people they would not make every decision fairly, they would not be in office for life and they wouldn't be as well respected.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Life Tenure

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Because the life tenure for a Supreme Court Justice will protect them from making biased or “polarised” decisions, the life tenure should remain as it has been for over two hundred years. Just in the past year, Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Thomas, and Justice Alito, who are all more conservative, have all voted on certain cases with more liberal justices. Andrew Martin and Kevin Quinn, who have researched the decisions of justices, have discovered that several justices change their opinions over time, something that wouldn’t happen so…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The next president will probably appoint at least one, and up to four or five new Supreme Court Justices. This will shift the balance of power in the Court for probably the next 50 or 60 years. With all of the very important decisions that the Supreme Court will have to make in the near future, the fate of the country may fall into its hands. These decisions will include the fate of the disastrous Obamacare, issues of gun control, net neutrality, and many other decisions that could lead to the loss of America’s freedom. Some of these decisions could make significant changes to the way that the first second and fourth amendments are interpreted.…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays