Preview

Forensics

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
491 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Forensics
Kimberly Correa
Forensics
Dr. Edmond Locard was a pioneer in forensic science who became known as the Sherlock Holmes of France. He formulated the basic principle of forensic science: "Every contact leaves a trace". This became known as Locard's exchange principle. Born on November 13 1877 in Saint-Chamond, France, Locard studied medicine and law at Lyon, eventually becoming the assistant of Alexandre Lacassagne, a criminologist and professor. He held this post until 1910, when he began the foundation of his criminal laboratory. He produced a monumental, seven-volume work, Traité de Criminalistique. Locard worked as a medical examiner during World War I and was able to identify causes and locations of death by looking at stains or dirt left on soldier's uniforms.In 1910, Locard succeeded in persuading the Police Department of Lyon (France) to give him two attic rooms and two assistants, to start what became the first police laboratory. He was a pioneer.
Locard believed that no matter where a criminal goes or what a criminal does, he will leave something at the scene of the crime. At the same time, he will also take something back with him. A criminal can leave all sorts of evidence, including fingerprints, footprints, hair, skin, blood, bodily fluids, pieces of clothing and more. Dr. Locard tested out this principle during many of his investigations. In 1912, for instance, a Frenchwoman named Marie Latelle was found dead in her parents' home. Her boyfriend at the time, Emile Gourbin, was questioned by police, but he claimed he had been playing cards with some friends the night of the murder. After the friends were questioned, Gourbin appeared to be telling the truth.
When Locard looked at the corpse, however, he was led to believe otherwise. He first examined Latelle's body and found clear evidence that she was strangled to death. He then scraped underneath Gourbin's fingernails for skin cell samples and later viewed the results underneath a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    9.07 Lab

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    7.Wilfred Derome helped pioneer balastic analyzes by founding the labratoire de recherches medico-legales de montreal. This was the first forensics laboratory in North America, and the tird in the world.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The evidence found around the crime scene, such as the beer bottle was important because it gives clues as to what happened…

    • 292 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. How do the clues found at a scene of a mysterious death help investigators determine what might have occurred and help identify or exonerate potential suspects?…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One mistake that the police made was a failure to search a certain room A police officer stood in front of the door to that room, but he walked away without going in (Keene-Osborne, Glick, and Murr 1). Jonbenet’s dad later found her in that same room (Schiller 2). One of the family’s friends said that they had looked in the room before, but they had not seen the body (Keene-Osborne, Glick, and Murr 2). When Jonbenet’s dad found her, he carried her body upstairs, which contaminated the crime scene (Keene-Osborne, Glick, and Murr 1). After her dad moved her upstairs, a detective moved her body under the Christmas tree, which also removed any evidence that was on her body (Keene-Osborne, Glick, and Murr 3). Another one of the family’s friends tried to help by cleaning the kitchen, but they could have destroyed some of the evidence by doing so (Keene-Osborne, Glick, and Murr 2). There were also some very mysterious things about the crime. The police suspected that a black flashlight hit Jonbenet in the head. A flashlight was seen on the kitchen counter at their home on the morning that Jonbenet was found, but then it went missing (Howard 1). There was also a mysterious bear shown in some of the pictures of Jonbenet’s room. The bear was shown near other stuffed animals, but the Ramseys said that they had never seen this bear before. Some people wonder if it was brought in by an intruder (Howard 1). The mysterious murder of Jonbenet Ramsey may never be solved.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1892, Francisca Rojas was found with intense neck injuries while her two sons were found with their throats cut open and dead. Francisca Rojas fanatically accused her neighbor who, under extreme interrogation, would not confess of committing murder and injuring Rojas’s neck. Inspector Alvarez, the head of the case, went to the crime scene and found a bloody fingerprint next to where the boys laid. After comparing the fingerprint to those of the neighbor, mother, sons, and other suspects, Alvarez deduced that it matched the mother’s right thumbprint. She then confessed to the murdering of her sons. The discovery of the print saved an innocent neighbor from harsh punishment. Fingerprints help solve crimes and save people's lives everyday. For that reason, it is important for people to understand fingerprints significance.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 6 Peggy

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The roles of the Prosecutor were not easy in this case. The prosecutor was given old evidence that really had no concrete. The police had only a knife collection, drawings, and a date of Masters Mother’s death to build a case on.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    01

    • 285 Words
    • 1 Page

    One pioneer in autopsy is James Marsh. He devised a test that could better stand up in court after a man laced his grandfather’s coffee with poison and was acquitted.…

    • 285 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic Science

    • 305 Words
    • 1 Page

    3. What does LIBS stand for? What does this do? LIBS stands for Laser Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy. It shows what something is made of.…

    • 305 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Quiz 1 Study Guide

    • 2167 Words
    • 9 Pages

    - Edmond Locard: Incorporated Gross’ principles within a workable crime laboratory - Locards exchange principle…

    • 2167 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    forensics

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What physical evidence did you find at the victim’s home? A box of matches, a space heater, beer bottles, Natalie’s wallet, a V-shaped burn pattern, burned outlet, a protected surface on the ground, crazed glass, and a puddle-shaped burn pattern.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    forensic science

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. challenges in analyzing tool marks may include duplicating the marks left by tools through tests in the laboratory, and finding individual…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    David Camm's Case Study

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page

    The future use of this method in crime scenes could be a key factor when convicting a person on trial or determining if the witnesses or bystanders are indeed telling the truth. In the year 2000, David Camm was accused of fatally shooting his wife and two children. David was allegedly playing basketball at church when his family was murdered. It was not until he returned home, that he discovered the lifeless bodies of his family. Camm was convicted because of bloodstains found on his shirt, which he claimed were caused by coming into contact with his son’s body, in an attempt to revive him through CPR (site). David Camm’s claim as to why there were bloodstains on his shirt seemed believable because he was a state trooper and indeed had some…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bio Lab Report Crime Scene

    • 1493 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Information gathered about the victim she appeared to be talking to her mother while the incident happen, and it was not unusual seen her work late at night. Also, there was some information about five suspects that might have been involve in the homicide. Lisenbee Cayle S. Microbiology Professor, at the time of the murder he stated he was looking for money from students so he could buy another pint of beer, and was wearing blue t-shirt and jeans. Daydiff Patrick D. Microbiology Lecturer, at the time of the murder he stated he was drinking at Hooters and was hearing a blue button down shirt and black pants. Olson John P. Biology Professor, at the time of the murder he stated he was at an all night Chinese buffet, and was wearing blue flannel shirt and jeans. Houtchens Jason O. Chemistry Lecturer, at the time of the murder he was teaching Chemistry 101 lab, and was wearing a blue polo shirt and jeans. Waffle Debra A. Lab Technician, at the time of the crime scene she stated she was preparing for Microbiology 206 lab, and she was wearing blue lab coat and khaki pants.…

    • 1493 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Grisham Case

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It included blood, semen, and hair…In this case there are both answered and unanswered questions involving that evidence. Discuss the evidence recovered from the scene and victim as described in the book and its importance in the investigation and subsequent conviction.” The first few pieces of evidence that were found were the notes left by the killer on the wall, table, and on the back of Debbie’s body. The notes were written in various types of liquids. Each read “Jim Smith next will die”, “Don’t look fore us or ealse”, and “Duke Gram.” This evidence was important as police used the handwriting analysis on several suspects to try to find the killer that way. But because the killer had written in fingernail polish and catsup, it was hard to determine the difference and was deemed unreliable. The next pieces of evidence that were found consisted of a bloody towel that was stuffed in Debbie’s mouth as well as hair on the body, the floor, the bed, and on stuffed animals in her bedroom. An analysis was done on the hair found and compared to various samples taken from suspects. Experts concluded that Ron and Dennis’ samples were “microscopically consistent.” However, back then hair analysis tests were wildly unreliable because the tests only compared ethnic groups and not individual characteristics. Detectives also recovered “bed sheets, pillowcases, blankets, the electrical cord that was used to strangle Debbie, a pair of torn panties, stuffed animals, a package of Marlboro cigarettes, an empty 7-Up can, a plastic shampoo bottle, cigarette butts, a drinking glass from the kitchen, and the telephone.” (Grisham, 10) Detectives also tested for fingerprints by dusting the door, window panes and wooden surfaces in the bedroom, the kitchen table, broken glass, and Debbie’s car. The last piece of evidence found at the scene was a bloodstain on the lower part of the wall.…

    • 1798 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    locards principle

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Locard’s principle, the basic principle of forensic science, was formulated by Dr. Edmond Locard. Dr. Edmond Locard believes and states “Every contact leaves a trace”, meaning whatever is touched, left behind or approached will serve as factual evidence against a person and only can that evidence be failed is by the lack of human effort by failing to study and understand it. The Locard’s exchange principle believes no matter what a criminal does or where a criminal goes, simply by coming in contact with anything, a criminal is capable of leaving many different sorts of criminal evidence for investigators to gather and collect. Having said this, different sorts of evidence can include, fingerprints, footprints, DNA, hair, bodily fluids, skin cells, blood, clothing, fibers, etc. Though many different types of evidence can be investigated and found at a crime scene, it is extremely common that when a criminal leaves the location in where a crime has been committed, that criminal will most likely take away something such as evidence from the scene with them. Trace evidence is clear and factual physical evidence, which most importantly, cannot lie, be forgotten and be cannot be wrong. As Paul L. Kirk expressed and explains Locard’s exchange principle, Paul L. Kirk states “Trace evidence (physical materials) is a silent witness that speaks when humans cannot”. An example of Locard’s exchange principle can be viewed as the following, a person enters another person’s home and strangles that person to death. The person who strangled and committed this crime has now most likely left footprints and other evidence at the scene of the crime. When police, detectives, investigators, etc… have located and found that suspect involved this this crime, you find the victims skin cells under the suspects fingernails, the case has now been solved because that criminal has taken away evidence from the scene with them. The importance of this principle from the perspective of a criminal…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays