Foundations of Nursing Practise
Foundations of Nursing Practice Assessment Criteria (Level 4)
CRITERION | 80-100 Excellent | 70-79 Very good | 60-69 Good | 50-59 Sound | 40-49 Satisfactory | 20-39 Fail | 0-19 Fail | PRESENTATION & STYLE | Coherence and organisation of assignment | Strong logical organisation and coherence enhances fulfilment of the assignment objectives. | Demonstrates logical organisation and coherence. | Demonstrates sound, thoughtful organisation. | Demonstrates generally sound, conventional organisation. | Shows limited organisation. | Poorly presented and structured but partially understandable. | Disorganised and/or incoherent. | | | | | | | | | Clarity of expression (incl. accuracy, spelling, grammar, punctuation | Fluent writing style appropriate to the assignment. Grammar and spelling accurate. | Language fluent. Grammar and spelling mainly accurate | Language generally fluent. Grammar and spelling mainly accurate | Meaning clear, but language not always fluent. Grammar and/or spelling contain errors. | Generally understandable, but language contains errors which detract from the argument. | Meaning often unclear and/or frequent errors in grammar and/or spelling. | Meaning unclear. Poor spelling, grammar and punctuation. | | | | | | | | | CONFORMING TO INSTRUCTIONS | Attention to purpose | Addresses the full purpose of the assignment with some creativity. | Addresses the full purpose of the assignment. | Addresses the main purpose of the assignment effectively. | Generally addresses the main purpose of the assignment. | Some of the work is focused on the aims and themes of the assignment. | Mostly fails to address the task set. | Fails to address the task set. | | | | | | | | | Referencing | Sources used are acknowledged in the text and reference list and used effectively to support discussion. Referencing follows a systematic approach, appropriate to
CRITERION | 80-100 Excellent | 70-79 Very good | 60-69 Good | 50-59 Sound | 40-49 Satisfactory | 20-39 Fail | 0-19 Fail | PRESENTATION & STYLE | Coherence and organisation of assignment | Strong logical organisation and coherence enhances fulfilment of the assignment objectives. | Demonstrates logical organisation and coherence. | Demonstrates sound, thoughtful organisation. | Demonstrates generally sound, conventional organisation. | Shows limited organisation. | Poorly presented and structured but partially understandable. | Disorganised and/or incoherent. | | | | | | | | | Clarity of expression (incl. accuracy, spelling, grammar, punctuation | Fluent writing style appropriate to the assignment. Grammar and spelling accurate. | Language fluent. Grammar and spelling mainly accurate | Language generally fluent. Grammar and spelling mainly accurate | Meaning clear, but language not always fluent. Grammar and/or spelling contain errors. | Generally understandable, but language contains errors which detract from the argument. | Meaning often unclear and/or frequent errors in grammar and/or spelling. | Meaning unclear. Poor spelling, grammar and punctuation. | | | | | | | | | CONFORMING TO INSTRUCTIONS | Attention to purpose | Addresses the full purpose of the assignment with some creativity. | Addresses the full purpose of the assignment. | Addresses the main purpose of the assignment effectively. | Generally addresses the main purpose of the assignment. | Some of the work is focused on the aims and themes of the assignment. | Mostly fails to address the task set. | Fails to address the task set. | | | | | | | | | Referencing | Sources used are acknowledged in the text and reference list and used effectively to support discussion. Referencing follows a systematic approach, appropriate to