English 1A
2/25/14
Freedom of choice
Llosa's opinion in “A Smoker's Right” is that to do something bad for us such as smoking is
our own choice and we should have the freedom to do those harmful or bad things if we so choose
since it it our body and our lives.
I agree with Llosa to an extent, It is not freedom if we don't have a choice. Her use of suicide
does throw my support of her opinion off a little because I do not feel as if suicide is morally okay.
I believe that yes we should be able to make our own choices but that we should also have to pay
the consequences, We should also not be able to harm others legally. To better explain my point ill
use smoking as an example. First Smoking harms your body; But you should have the choice to
choose smoke if you want because its your body. Smoking also harms other people's bodies so you
should not be able to do it in public where it may harm someone who does not wish to suffer its
side effects as is there right. My second example is a crime, be it you steal, murder or jaywalk you
are either taking, damaging or putting in danger someones life or possessions. That is why crimes
are illegal. This is where suicide muddles in the gray area. When committing suicide you are
murdering yourself so technically it is your own body thus should be your choice. You can ask does
suicide hurt or endanger anyone else, well yes most likely it will emotionally hurt family friends
and loved ones, But it does not physically hurt them. Granted it hypothetically could cause a family
member to go into depression and harm themselves, But wouldn't that be there choice. As you can
see it can be hard to draw a line especially in the case of assisted suicide. In assisted suicide one or
more people help another commit suicide. Does that count as murder or does it not count because
it is the choice of the person who wants to commit suicide to let others harm his body for him ? I
believe suicide is wrong and a person should find help and get threw there problems but I also don't
believe it is my right to tell the they cant commit suicide because they have the freedom to do so if
they want.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Freedom of religion should be protected because it doesn’t mean federal government is setting an official religion of the United States if the freedom of religion is really given, if an individual is forced to follow certain customs and beliefs, that person is not whole-heartedly being religious, and it allows a person to change their religion if they want to follow the same religion as their spouse…
- 438 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Every person knows what the circle of life consists of- to be born, to grow and to die. The lines between the right and wrongs of each are fuzzy and unclear. Assisted suicide brings up one of the biggest moral debates and there are so many questions with no clear answers: who should and shouldn’t be allowed to assist in suicides? Should assisted suicide be just for the terminally ill, or for all? What protection will there be for the people? and the biggest question of all- is it right or wrong? Those who are considered “pro-death”, believe that being able to choose how one dies is their own right. That there is a significant “difference between killing a patient and allowing a patient to die” (Breslow). Others however, believe The Suicide…
- 161 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
My support on this claim it is assisted suicide a right way or wrong way By Claire Andre and Manuel Velasquez “Supporters of legislation legalizing assisted suicide claim that all persons have a moral right to choose freely what they will do with their lives as long as they inflict no harm on others. This right of free choice includes the right to end one 's life when we choose. For most…
- 531 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Many issues mention if assisting someone to kill themselves is illegal or not? Euthanization which is to end a person's life due to them suffering. The act of assisting suicide is assisting or encountering the other person to kill themselves. There are several classifications of euthanization; active and passive. “Three states have passed laws legalizing assisted suicide in certain limited circumstances. Under Oregon's Death with Dignity Act, physicians can prescribe lethal medication that will allow terminally ill individuals to end their lives. ” Oregon and two other states are the only one in the United States that don’t consider assisting suicide a crime. Since only 3 states have allowed it and the majority of the nation defines it as illegal…
- 124 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Euthanasia advocates Patients are constantly receiving criticism from those who believe that euthanasia is not ethical and should be illegal everywhere. Euthanasia can be defined as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease. The practice of euthanasia is illegal in most countries. Euthanasia can be either voluntary, non-voluntary, or involuntary. Voluntary euthanasia occurs when the patient requests to die. Non-voluntary euthanasia occurs when a patient is either unconscious or unable to make a choice regarding their death and an appropriate person makes this decision for them. Involuntary euthanasia occurs when the patient wishes to live but is killed anyway and is considered murder. There are different…
- 991 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
involves life and death issues. For over 2000 years it has been a prohibited medical…
- 5176 Words
- 21 Pages
Powerful Essays -
decide if it's good or bad except for those who are terminally ill. Some call “Physician Assisted…
- 1913 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
In the reading “Freedom of the Will And the Concept of a Person” By Harry G. Frankfurt, Frankfurt takes a deeper look into the freedom of will concept. In the beginning it was very confusing because he uses examples that are hard to follow, for example instead of saying actions he says “X” and instead of saying man or people he says “A” and it got really hard to follow. I understood what he was trying to say but he could have done a better job with it. A part that I found really interesting in section II was his description of “second order violations”. His use of the example of the narcotics addicts was used very well; I was able to understand the idea of desire and free will because of that example. I found it interesting to know that addicts do not have freedom of will according to Frankfurt. The addicts are against their will and their will forces them to take the drug. In the reading Frankfurt asked an interesting question that caught my attention “Just what kind of freedom is the freedom of will?” That question had me think, and was later answered by Frankfurt when he said that “ having the freedom to do what one wants to do is not sufficient condition of having free will”. I agree with this that you can have the freedom to do what you want, but in reality you don’t have freedom of will and that we are just a helpless bystander to the forces that move us. Overall this was not one of my favorite readings, but it was an interesting one. There were many strong points that he brought up about freedom of will that liked and he also had points that I disliked.…
- 298 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
pain. So should a person have the right to take another person's life or his own…
- 840 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The second form of euthanasia is non-voluntary and is illegal in all countries. However, it could be…
- 1037 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Another problem with Act utilitarianism is violating individual rights. What if in order to do the greatest…
- 607 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Imagine when you were going out to eat and decided to order some salad. However, the server…
- 1285 Words
- 1 Page
Powerful Essays -
Bethany Free has decided to set up a physiotherapy clinic called Freedom of Movement. The clinic will specialise in treating elderly patients who are losing mobility. She has been able to arrange that rooms available at the local retirement village can be rented for her clinic. The address is 245 Waterdale Road, Heidelberg.…
- 1945 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
Growing up as a kid, I loved books. My mom would take my sister and I to the library frequently. What made books so appealing to me was that at the library there was a room full of them and I could pick whichever ones I wanted. This was my first experience with freedom, one of the only parts of my life I could control. When you’re 8 years old, even maybe 10 anywhere you go you’re choices are limited. You’re completely dependent on parents for money if you even get to buy what you want. It was a big deal for me because my mom usually made my decisions for me; my life was planned and I had an empty head. I also liked books as a kid because reading came pretty easy to me. I wasn’t someone who stumbled over words or needed to practice reading extra. Reading gave me confidence, and at the same time it was something I could challenge myself with. I liked to read book series, like the majic treehouse books it was a challenge and an accomplishment to finish each series, to read thicker heavier books.…
- 1100 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
To what extent is individual freedom over the sets of rules and moral values established by our society?…
- 757 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays