Preview

Fromm And Disobedience

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
428 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fromm And Disobedience
In his essay “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem” Erich Fromm states that human history can change forever by just an act of disobedience. Fromm starts off by stating how people in power have always professed that those below them should obey rather than disobey. Fromm writes about how key ancient figures like Prometheus and Adam and Eve acted out in disobedience. Fromm also states that these figures didn’t regret their decisions nor did they ask for forgiveness. Fromm further claims that man has continuously changed due to the way man has continued to say no to their overlords. Fromm continues by saying because of the way man has disobeyed, it has led to them becoming smarter by challenging those that have tried to hinder change. Fromm argues that if the ending of man can be by an act of obedience. Fromm continues this by stating that our leaders greed will persuade someone to do bad things and if that man obeys it could lead to the extinction of the human race. Fromm clarifies more about obedience and disobedience be stating that a slave can only obey, but a man who disobeys because of anger is not a revolutionary but a rebel. Fromm continues to clarify that if a man does not listen to his own morality in compliance to an order then he is being obedient, but if a man acts by his own accord to follow an …show more content…
Nisbett, some of these people may just be using the situation to be bad. I feel that a lot of those stories about the American soldiers were just people taking advantage of the situation to feel like the authority in the scenario. Although, these people may also just be people who have the authoritarian conscience, and are just afraid of disappointing their overlords. According to Ross and Nisbett, you can’t really predict these actions even if those people were expected to do the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Throughout this essay, Szegedy-Maszak attempts to answer the question: Are there particular conditions in Iraq that might shed light on why these soldiers committed these unconscionable acts? (Szegedy-Maszak p. 173). She begins by presenting two famous psychological experiments that explore the capacity for evil residing in normal people, (Szegedy-Maszak p. 174). The first experiment, conducted by Stanford psychologist Philip Zimbardo, attempted to mimic a real life prison scenario with students impersonating actual guards and prisoners. Surprisingly, the results were analogous to the actual events that took place at Abu Ghraib prison. The second experiment, created by Stanley Milgram, studied some peoples willingness to follow orders. The experiment began with an actor sitting in a chair supposedly wired with electricity. For every wrong answer this actor would give, volunteers were asked to deliver increasingly dangerous electric shocks to the actor in the chair. The results showed that two out of the three volunteers delivered potentially lethal electric shocks.…

    • 779 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Stanley Milgram's, The Perils of Obedience, Milgram states "obedience is as basic an element in the structure of social life as one can point to."(1) Milgram then shows how submission to that authority goes back as far as Abraham. He makes us look into ourselves and see why we obey these commands against our better judgment.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They were used to simple rules followed by society, knowing that killing is bad, your not allowed to drink alcohol under 21, and simply how to stop at a stoplight. Your morality is twisted and turned by the effects of war as killing once may have been bad in society but when you're faced against the dilemma that it's either “kill or be killed” the soldiers thoughts and emotions change drastically in that moment and forever. In society it's a rare moment to even come close to dying on a daily basis, whereas these soldiers are faced with almost dying every day instantaneously, they change because the set of rules they may have been used to following have changed. Killing may have been bad but now they are forced to survive without even taking a second thought to as if what they are doing is bad. If they had the moment to think about it in their thoughts they would be thinking about how the people they are killing may have families, be somebody's son/daughter, somebody's brother, somebody's lover,etc. If they were not forced to do this their morality and emotions wouldn't let most of them be able to do…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “If the law requires you to be the agent of injustice, then, I say, break the law” (Henry Thoreau) This famous quote is taken from the famous essay Civil Disobedience written in 1848, Civil Disobedience still stands as an expression of moral and individual conscience against a un just government. To begin, the quote written by Henry Thoreau, “If the law requires you to be the agent of injustice, then, I say, break the law” is essentially saying If following the law results in a wrong done to another person, then do not follow the law, and that morals from human to human come before government rules or laws resulting in disobedience.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Howard is not one of those people. He wanted to go to war, he did not hesitate, because for him, going to war was better than staying in Chicago, where the riots where going on. The book, he said, was very romanticized, and didn’t describe the war realistically enough. He did not agree with the way, many things were described. As described in the book, the soldiers killed, because they were embarrassed not to (p. 20). Howard said, that they didn’t kill because they were afraid of “blushing”, but because they had to, they wanted to survive.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Case Against Civil Disobedience the unknown author claims in his very first sentence that “the most striking characteristic of civil disobedience is its irrelevance to the problems of today” and that it is “the resort… exercised because the subject cannot or will not take up the rights and duties of the citizen.” What he fails to realize is that the rights and duties of a citizen is to keep an eye on the laws that rule the land and to revolt when those laws become unjust. It’s all part and parcel to the social contract thought up by Locke and heavily leaned upon by Thomas Jefferson. As Henry David Thoreau says in Civil Disobedience, “a corporation of conscientious men is a corporation with a conscious.” Civil disobedience can never become irrelevant because corruption will forever attempt to corrode even the best intentions of a government and so there will always be a need to revolt when unjust laws get pasted.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    essay 10416

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem” by Erich Fromm, Fromm states that human history was started by an act of disobedience, and that it will be ended by an act of obedience. He then says that the majority of human authorities and governments throughout history have demonized disobedience while sanctifying obedience, as their power comes from the obedience of the masses and that only obedience bred as a virtue can be sustained by such organizations. He states that the obedience of the masses and the power gained from it are what allow the governing few to enjoy the limited quantities of luxuries and other resources available only to those with power and the means to use it. He also states that the human conscience is divided into 2 types: the humanistic conscience, which instinctively knows which actions and things are human and which are inhuman, and the authoritarian conscience, which encourages us to follow the rules and behaviors taught to us by society and those in power.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Fromm essay” Disobedience as a psychological and moral problem”, he had explained about the difference between the obedience and disobedience, and what impact of a positive or negative on the human society. According to Fromm human life to live as human beings, must disobey want to develop it. "If you do not know single line human disobedience to obedience, he is a slave," saying that the prompt can be understood as such intention. At the same time, however, prompting the line only to be aware of if you do not know how to obey "human disobedience, he is only on the peninsula..: It (* Peninsula skip the insurgency and join a group or him) was called Peninsula is full of simple anger or resentment It was not likely to prompt bar is oriented.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Human history began with an act of disobedience, and it is not unlikely that it will be terminated by an act of obedience” (Fromm, 1981, ¶1). Comparing this statement to the historical idea that obedience is a virtue and disobedience is a vice is the basis of Erich Fromm’s essay entitled “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem” (1981).…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The debate was thrust into a hotbed of discussion during the peak of the Civil Rights Movement in the United States. In 1964, Morris I. Leibman was an avid anti-civil disobedience activist. He argued that there is no reason for any citizen to find an excuse to break the law because when people agree to enter society, they accept the rules that society establishes. Once you break these laws, there is no purpose to society existing in the first place. He argues that if you give leeway to certain circumstances in the law, where do you draw the line? In his mind, civil disobedience is deplorable and believes it’s the wrong way to create change. Continuing with this train of thought, Herbert Storing argued that civil disobedience would likely die out because of its irrelevance to today’s problems. He found it’s attempt to combine revolution and conventional political action into one as a blend of ideas ineffective in its approach for change. Both of these men wrote their responses to civil disobedience at the height of the Civil Rights Movement in the U.S. and both agreed that black people deserved equal opportunity under the law, but they felt that civil disobedience was a regressive tactic…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To adapt to a changing world, progress must be made to socially accommodate this change. For any Progressive change to be made, someone must fight back against something wrong, or another words, be disobedient. As the Irish author Oscar Wilde one stated “it is through disobedience that progressive change has been made” and this natural human trait of disobedience is a catalyst for Progressive change.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Mytileneans revolted, Cleon decided to make an example of them to showcase Athens’ power and authority. He believed this would remind the Greek world of the power that Athens has, and that they can do whatever they please, just or unjust. Cleon’s suggestion was that any man that was of age to join the military should be killed, while all the rest of the men and women to be enslaved. Fortunately for Athens, another Athenian by the name of Diodotus exclaimed that this was not a good decision. He believed that “you would have to be simple-minded to believe that people can be deterred, by force of law or by anything else that is frightening, from doing what human nature is earnestly bent on doing” (Thucydides, p.73). Diodotus believes that no matter what the penalty is, if a single person or group of people is set on doing something, they will do it. He is suggesting to Cleon and Athens that the Mytileneans would risk possible death from disobeying unjust laws. This agrees to Martin Luther King Jr.’s idea that it is morally acceptable for someone to disobey unjust laws when these laws are detrimental to someone’s given…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance to rules and regulations among society goes down historically as something so inevitably iconic as an occurrence known as civil disobedience. It is no doubt that civil disobedience, the act of opposing a law deemed unjust and peacefully disobeying it henceforth, spurs such great controversy in our society. Civil disobedience impacts society in a positive manner that does not hinder nor deteriorate the good name of the just nation that is home, but moreover poses as an influence for what is better accepted by humans as lawful.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Disobedience,” the word has different connotations. Many people have disobeyed throughout the course of their life, considering that rebellion is a natural human instinct. This refusal to obey is a trait that cannot suppress, especially in the fight for correct human rights.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry David Thoreau was arrested for his refusal to pay a state tax in support of the Mexican-American War. He was opposed to the war because it was intended to expand the slave states. Thoreau not only engaged in civil disobedience, but in his essay “Civil Disobedience”…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays