The author points out that after he is put in the prison, Pestretsov is no longer in the view we’ve been seeing him as, “Not a 'Russian' or 'Communist' or 'soldier' or 'enemy' or any of those categories. Just-a-man, who cared for just-a-woman, for just-a-time, more than anything else.” Now, he is no longer talked about as a Russian, but a man; the element of separate, of difference, is no longer incorporated. The similarity is made more prominent when Fulgham praises Pestretsov for dignifying that covenant that is the same in any language, a vow mainly used in wedding ceremonies. He is praised for being a man like the rest of us because all grieve and make vows in partnerships. By the end of the editorial, Fulgham proves his point that, while we see us as different from the Russians and divide from them, we are indeed similar; Humankind will judge others based on opinionated or limited knowledge and completely forget the fact that all of humanity share the same emotional
The author points out that after he is put in the prison, Pestretsov is no longer in the view we’ve been seeing him as, “Not a 'Russian' or 'Communist' or 'soldier' or 'enemy' or any of those categories. Just-a-man, who cared for just-a-woman, for just-a-time, more than anything else.” Now, he is no longer talked about as a Russian, but a man; the element of separate, of difference, is no longer incorporated. The similarity is made more prominent when Fulgham praises Pestretsov for dignifying that covenant that is the same in any language, a vow mainly used in wedding ceremonies. He is praised for being a man like the rest of us because all grieve and make vows in partnerships. By the end of the editorial, Fulgham proves his point that, while we see us as different from the Russians and divide from them, we are indeed similar; Humankind will judge others based on opinionated or limited knowledge and completely forget the fact that all of humanity share the same emotional