Preview

Fulgham In The Russians Are A Rotated Rot

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
512 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fulgham In The Russians Are A Rotated Rot
Fulgham in THE RUSSIANS ARE A ROTTEN LOT says that prejudice and assumptions accumulated from the lack of perception and truth about ones humanity leads to the choice of separation, and in some occurrences, war. The author begins the editorial by reciting a version of the bias news that would have been heard by Americans, and others opposing Russia, during the Cold War. By strongly stating, “the Russians are a rotten lot, immoral, aggressive, ruthless, coarse, and generally evil,” the reader is indirectly given the option to side with or against Fulgham for the remaining text. No matter the reader’s choice, they would be making assumptions based off the brief, opinion-based information. After inserting the bias view and compelling the reader to chose a side, Fulgham introduces a sergeant major in the Russian Army stationed in Angola who had been capture by …show more content…
The author points out that after he is put in the prison, Pestretsov is no longer in the view we’ve been seeing him as, “Not a 'Russian' or 'Communist' or 'soldier' or 'enemy' or any of those categories. Just-a-man, who cared for just-a-woman, for just-a-time, more than anything else.” Now, he is no longer talked about as a Russian, but a man; the element of separate, of difference, is no longer incorporated. The similarity is made more prominent when Fulgham praises Pestretsov for dignifying that covenant that is the same in any language, a vow mainly used in wedding ceremonies. He is praised for being a man like the rest of us because all grieve and make vows in partnerships. By the end of the editorial, Fulgham proves his point that, while we see us as different from the Russians and divide from them, we are indeed similar; Humankind will judge others based on opinionated or limited knowledge and completely forget the fact that all of humanity share the same emotional

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    to Russia don't mess with us or we will mess you up, and has an air of Nationalism in it.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assess the view that the disagreements about the Second Front were the most significant cause of tension between Russia and the West between 1941-5?…

    • 2524 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    gap between the fundamental ideological divisions of Soviet Russia and the United States. This may be an…

    • 1073 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The novel that elevated George Orwell to literary fame was Animal Farm; a satirical ‘fairy tale for adults’ based on the themes of totalitarianism and Stalinism. In accordance with the theme, the book heavily satirizes the Russian Revolution; both directly and indirectly, and therefore gives rise to a host of examples to substantiate the statement: ‘Totalitarianism thrives on the exploitation of the weak by the strong’; the topic of discussion in this essay.…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Generals Die in Bed

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Through the soldiers’ experiences, the narrator shows only the dark side of human nature. Discuss.…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    APUSH DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 9 Pages

    fear the men in the Kremlin, we fear what they will do to our friends around them; we are…

    • 1101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A Quilt of a Country” an essay written by Anna Quindlen, conveys a message about the suffrage that builds up behind the tragedies we witness, connect us a country, the author discusses this as seen by her use of real-world events that affected our nation, yet, brought the people together. Within the article, Quindlen mentions the 9/11 tragedy to provide of a more realistic emotion, one people can connect to. That tragedy had affected the people, it led to devastation from the loss, but also led to unity against the common enemy. In the article, Quindlen questions her readers by asking, “What is the point of a nation in which one part seems to always be on the verge of fisticuffs with another…” This rhetorical question the author asks, explains…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cosi

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages

    3.The perspective that Leunig has on the war is reasonable logical. Leunig states that “no nation can go to war a sufficient reserve of hatred cruelty…. Concreted in its general population.” It is quite reasonable to state that Leunig’s statement is logical-…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Quintilian Rhetoric

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These values have resonated down from Socrates’ to Lincoln’s and finally Levertov’s orations, and they continue to influence, persuade and challenge responders from any context to critically perceive and improve their own societies. As in Lincoln’s oration, Levertov uses rhetoric to sway our emotions. The hyperbolised oxymoron “a ‘balanced’ view of genocide”, combined with repeatedly re-enforced images of decay and destruction through long sentences of anaphoric listing, has an amplified emotional effect in highlighting the morally degraded state of society, challenging 1970s audiences to act. These images of decay simultaneously evoke an emotional response within future responders, forcing them to consider the enduring social and moral issue of war. Images of tranquility and beauty, “the spring sunshine, the new leaves” are contrasted to the reality of 1970s society. The universal appreciation of this image of beauty and peace not only influenced Levertov’s American audience to oppose the horror that was the Vietnam War, but continues to force future responders to question the very notion of warfare and oppose this impediment on society’s moral progress. Indeed, this indictment of governmental control over the moral direction of society is…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “Comrade, I did not want to kill you…But you were only an idea to before me, and abstraction that lived in my mind and called forth its appropriate response. It was an abstraction I stabbed. But now, for the first time, I see you are a man like me. I thought of your hand-grenades, of your bayonet, of your rifle; now I see your wife and your face and our fellowship. Forgive me, comrade. We always see it too late. Why do they never tell us that you are poor devils like us, that your mothers are just as anxious as ours, and that we have the same fear of death, and the same dying and the same agony-forgive me, comrade; how could you be my enemy?”~~Page 223…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Rainsford sat down for breakfast, he asked Ivan to fetch the general. He felt almost sorry for Ivan, and he wondered how it must feel to be deaf-mute, to never have your own life and to always live it under someone else’s control. But Rainsford did not have long to pity Ivan, as the general walked in. Rainsford studied his long, wiry black beard and his unnerving dark black eyes which showed no emotion. A night of sleeping with the dogs had proved very damaging on his appearance, as he had big black bags under his eyes and seemed even more exhausted than what was humanly possible. “Thank you for coming up to breakfast” said Rainsford, trying to keep his voice blank. “Thank you for inviting me” replied the general, his Russian accent thick and emotionless, his black eyes studying Rainsford unnervingly, as though he was studying a rare animal he was about to pounce on. Rainsford refused to be un-nerved by the general, as he knew that he must stand his ground in order for the general to take his proposal seriously. “How was your night?” Rainsford asked, trying to build up conversation. “I have had better nights”,…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetoric Of Fear Analysis

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thus a common way of thinking is formed which is no differentiated and is requiring nothing more or special of himself beyond what the mass media the mass hysteria and fear of economic annihilation dictate.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miss

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Secondly he further state that because of the cold war, families are separated, dividing husbands and wives and brothers and sisters and dividing people who wished to be joined together and he also adds pathos in this paragraph.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    that “human nature is pretty much the same the whole world over”(P1) and that there is…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Denise Levertov

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Levertov considers universal human race by bearing in mind that men and women the same by using "we" – "Yes, this is…peace would have." (lines 40 to 47).…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays